Jackson v. Walker et al - 4

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
30
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
Jackson v. Walker et al Doc. 4 Case 3:07-cv-00625-DRH Document 4 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS NATHANIEL JACKSON, #B-13583, Plaintiff, vs. ROGER E. WALKER, JR., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 07-625-DRH MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HERNDON, District Judge: Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 together with a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. However, Plaintiff has not submitted a certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement for the sixmonth period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, nor has he filed an affidavit that includes a statement of his assets as required by § 1915(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall submit, within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of the entry of this order, a certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement for the sixmonth period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint and an affidavit that includes a statement of his assets. Plaintiff is ADVISED that in the event he has been transferred among institutions during this six-month period, it is Plaintiff’s responsibility to obtain a copy of his prison trust account statement from each such facility and to forward it to the Court. Plaintiff is FURTHER ADVISED that his obligation to pay the filing fee for this action was incurred at the time the action was filed; such an obligation will exist whether or not Plaintiff is granted leave to Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:07-cv-00625-DRH Document 4 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 2 of 2 proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); see also Lucien v. Jockisch, 133 F.3d 464, 467 (7th Cir. 1998). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon conclusion of this thirty-day period, should Plaintiff fail to comply with this order, this case will be closed for failure to comply with an order of this Court. FED.R.CIV.P. 41(b); see generally Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with two copies of this District’s in forma pauperis motion form to assist him in complying with this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 6, 2007. /s/ DavidRHerndon DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
Jackson v. Walker et al - 11
Views: 25  |  Downloads: 0
Brown et al v. Walker - 19
Views: 35  |  Downloads: 0
Walker v. Bryant et al (INMATE 2) - 4
Views: 30  |  Downloads: 0
Jackson v. Jackson et al - 2
Views: 82  |  Downloads: 0
Jackson v. Stewart et al - 4
Views: 42  |  Downloads: 0
Raynor v. Jackson et al - 4
Views: 20  |  Downloads: 0
Walker v. Bryant et al (INMATE2) - 3
Views: 42  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Hottinger v. Walker, et al - 2
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 0
Jackson v. Robinson et al (INMATE2) - 3
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
Jackson v. Gutierrz et al - 2
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 0
Washington v. Jackson et al - 5
Views: 35  |  Downloads: 0
Gleeson v. Jackson, et al - 25
Views: 62  |  Downloads: 0
Harper v. Jackson et al - 39
Views: 75  |  Downloads: 0