Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
Doc. 782
Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC
Document 780 782
Filed 08/30/2007 08/31/2007
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ______________________________________ DATATREASURY CORPORATION Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, ET. AL. , Defendants ______________________________________
§ § § § § § § §
Civil Action No.:2:06-CV72 (DF) JURY TRIAL DEMAND
________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ________________________________________________________________________ Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Certain Deadlines relating to Plaintiff’s Sur-reply in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment for Claim Invalidity Based on Indefiniteness of U.S. Patent No. 5,583,759, Plaintiff’s Sur-reply in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment for Claim Invalidity Based on Indefiniteness of U.S. Patent No. 5,930,778 and Plaintiff’s Sur-reply in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment for Claim Invalidity Based on Indefiniteness of U.S. Patent No. 5,717,868. The Court having considered the matter, GRANTS the Motion and ORDERS that the deadlines be extended as set forth below:
Order
1
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC
Document 780 782
Filed 08/30/2007 08/31/2007
Page 2 of 2
.
Action Plaintiff files Sur-reply Brief in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (‘759) Plaintiff files Sur-reply Brief in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (‘778) (Plaintiff may combine ‘759 and ‘778 as Defendants have done) Plaintiff files Sur-reply Brief in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (‘868)
New Deadline 9/6/07
9/6/07
9/6/07
SIGNED this 31st day of August, 2007.
____________________________________ DAVID FOLSOM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Order
2