Scott v. Beth et al - 4

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
52
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
pages:
0
Scott v. Beth et al Doc. 4 Case 1:07-cv-00757-WCG Filed 08/24/2007 Page 1 of 2 Document 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JAMES C. SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. DAVID BETH and DR. JOHNSON, Defendants. Case No. 07-C-757 ORDER The plaintiff, James C. Scott, who is proceeding pro se, lodged a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that his civil rights were violated. Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at Kenosha County Jail. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), a prisoner plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for a federal lawsuit. If a prisoner does not have the money to pay the filing fee up front, he or she can request leave to proceed in forma pauperis in order to pay the fee over time. To proceed with an action in forma pauperis, the prisoner must complete a petition and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis and return it to the court with a certified copy of the prisoner’s trust account statement showing transactions for the prior six months. The court then assesses and, when funds exist, collects from the plaintiff an initial partial filing fee of twenty percent of either the average monthly deposits to or the average monthly balance in the prisoner's trust account for the sixmonth period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.1 1 In no event will a prisoner be prohibited from bringing a civil action because he or she has no assets and no means by which to pay the initial partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:07-cv-00757-WCG Filed 08/24/2007 Page 2 of 2 Document 4 In this case, the plaintiff filed a petition to proceed in forma pauperis and an appropriate affidavit. However, he did not file a certified copy of his institutional account statement showing transactions for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint, as required under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff will be given 21 days from the date of this order to submit a certified copy of his institutional account statement, or show cause as to why he is unable to do so. Failure to take either action within the allotted time frame will result in dismissal of his complaint without prejudice. SO ORDERED. Dated this 24th day of August, 2007. s/ William C. Griesbach WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH United States District Judge

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
Scott v. Weinberg et al - 4
Views: 30  |  Downloads: 0
Scott v. Scribner et al - 4
Views: 31  |  Downloads: 0
Hargrove v. Scott et al - 4
Views: 32  |  Downloads: 0
Scott v. Stanley et al - 2
Views: 21  |  Downloads: 0
Scott v. Ortiz et al - 1
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 0
Scott v. USA et al - 2
Views: 33  |  Downloads: 0
Scott v. Byrd et al - 8
Views: 23  |  Downloads: 0
Scott v. Brown et al - 1
Views: 29  |  Downloads: 0
Scott v. Anderson et al - 3
Views: 55  |  Downloads: 0
Scott v. Lacey et al - 5
Views: 28  |  Downloads: 0
Scott v. Jones et al - 8
Views: 34  |  Downloads: 0
Scott v. Nerio et al - 2
Views: 40  |  Downloads: 0
Scott v. Hackett et al - 1
Views: 32  |  Downloads: 0