(PC) Avery v. Director of CDCR, et al. - 6

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
24
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
pages:
0
(PC) Avery v. Director of CDCR, et al. Doc. 6 Case 1:07-cv-01175-OWW-WMW Document 6 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 DIRECTOR OF CDCR. et al., 15 Defendant(s). 16 / 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant 19 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 1915 and a copy of his prison trust account statement. However, plaintiff’s application 21 to proceed in forma pauperis did not include the required original signature by an authorized 22 officer of the institution of incarceration. Additionally, the copy of plaintiff’s prison trust 23 account statement was not certified. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff will be provided the 24 opportunity to submit a new application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his 25 trust account statement or pay the $350.00 filing fee. 26 -1SHANNON LEWIS AVERY, SR., 1:07-cv-1175 OWW WMW (PC) ORDER TO SUBMIT NEWAPPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND CERTIFIED COPY OF TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT OR PAY FILING FEE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:07-cv-01175-OWW-WMW Document 6 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk’s Office shall send to plaintiff the form for application to proceed in forma pauperis. 2. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit a completed, signed application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, or in the alternative, pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: j14hj0 August 21, 2007 /s/ William M. Wunderlich UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2-

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
(PC) Avery v. Director of CDCR, et al. - 7
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Medina v. Director of CDCR et al - 6
Views: 25  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Rodriguez v. CDCR, et al - 4
Views: 32  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Weaver v. Director et al - 3
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Martinez v. Kramer et al - 6
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Lopez v. Kernan et al - 6
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Holley v. Scott, et al - 6
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Hale v. Tilton et al - 6
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Jackson v. Woodford et al - 6
Views: 20  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Banks v. Schwerzenegger et al - 6
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Phillips v. Schwarzenegger, et al - 6
Views: 27  |  Downloads: 0
(DLB) (PC) Williams v. Tate et al - 6
Views: 33  |  Downloads: 0