professional documents
home
Profile
docsters
request
Blogs
Upload
user photo
Tim Stanley
Programmer
Justia
Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al Doc. 58 Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 12 VNFIgD STATES DISTRICI COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DXSJRICT OF / I L >rdn~fT,, L#t,\ m- - ---- i - I - . ^ - Ij WACOM INTERNATIONAL INC.. COMEDY PARTNERS. COUNTRY MUSIC TE&'ISION, INC., i PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORAnON, ) and BLACK ENTFRTTAINMENT TELEVISION ) ii = , ' ) ) ) Carc No. 07 Civ. 2103 (US) ) -.* -- , v. Y O ~ EINC., YOUTUBE, L W ,and , Go0Gl.E INC., 1 1 ) ) C. Yoo'hbe, Inc, YoclTobe, LCC,u d G b g k h.(You?tbeW % " e or *) are r c p r a d by Blrtlit Beck Aswrm h l e d w & Scott LLP and Wsm ir &mini Gocdrich & R d ,P.C. I. l A CONCIsE STATEMENT OF THE 198UES AS THEY NOW APpEiR 1. Tho V i m Plaint% (which inchd. P m a m c ~Pictums md -VI t leedingcablcnctwodcsinc~~,ComedyCmWdB~~cgc Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 2 of 12 that Dtfmlants Googls and You'hh have knowingly and intmtimated and operatod their Ym'hh webaitc t promote md profit from o masshe copyright i&hgcmmt o f t e l d m program and fcatun, 6bna on an unprpccdtntDd scale invoking hundreds of tbollsands of pirated video clips. Ddend&mtS thacbyviillfully violating tbc iatollcctual am p r o m right8 that wcrt meted md made valuable by ths investmmt of cnalivity, time, talent, energy, and o n d r s of c-t produeas of V i a n d 0 t h content owners. 2. Defmdanb conduct c~llstiluiw direct copyright Miiq-t, inducmrnt of copyright idhgancnt, cootribuhy copyright m a n o u t , and vicarious copyright i&hgmmt. Viacorn sseks m h s s only againat Dezkubnb' in6inging activity, not any innocent or nonin6ringing coaduct B a s e d a n ~ p u b l i c ~ t h e v i a c o m P ~ c x p a c t Deftndnmr to place heavy relimcc mthe no-cdcd dbhlxupM by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U S C 6 512(c) (%MU"). ... Tho DMCA i not 8 defeasc t W t v , but limits diefagainst Mingm s o l m d c r c a h i a ~ c c s~ . ~ t i s a o r p ~ thm DMCA,f multiple muons. m 3. b y 4. Defdmta have profited emmum@ h m this w e m e a t A ~ptltof~S1.65bUiaar~priocthatGoaglepaidfor 1. P~'daimsinthislawauit~t0silonca + b y bwndrcdr of milliom of p+e -tho globe who srchrngc i n f o r m a t i o l q n c w q d ~ ~ & Y o l i ~ ' a ~ h o o t i n g . . service. 2. Plaintiff&clpim that YouTnbc has d i r e d y or indirrctly in6inpd plaintiffs' copyrights. An hpwhnt pan of the case win be plaintiffs' of thc ~ ~ ~ V Q I L wpyrighted worLs and alleged of C infiin~at~sothattheputiolcands*rmimw~p~ ow0 and hay.registad each af the copyrighted matcdd it clpims (0 have bem infringed. Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 3 of 12 3 Plaiatiffs' claims llrc barred M d a f d by Lhe Millennium Cowright A n ' s (DMCA) Safe Hubor provLion~, includiog 17 U.S.C. 8 SI~(C)-& ( . ~ l b b c w &ow that it respects ths tmpmr$ncc of 4~ o ill intellectualpmpaty rights by not only complyinn with thc DMWs safe harborobligatioasbatbygoingwdlbcyondits~mprotcct intellectual pmpeay rights, inchding those of PhintEa. By thip laplaintiffs neck to upset tbs careful b L n c e that Cmgrcm wmrrtnroted i thc n DMCA which balanm, the ligbhof cp o* holders and the awd to proteci wmmuuicatim on the intCmet YouTubs ssssrts tbc following additiolraldefenses against p M claims.thedoctrintoffoiruse,tbedochincofsubstential~b6it@ng usc,tstoppcl,~,Laches.cogyrieht~,uncleanhrad8,md e~snars implied liccmw gnmtbd by P or M (c.g., p h h i f f ~ putting their own works c YouTubs a pcrmittiug othas to do the srmc). m Plaint&% cldm actual or 8taWay damages, as well as iqjwxtive rrlief. Atissucwillbcplaintiffs'cntitlanmttoanydamagcs,incl~whaher p ~ h a w ~ b c m r d E t s d 6 0 m ~ m Y o U ~ . n d wbcthaplaintiffi,hvcfdltdto~anyofthclralb@~. 4. 5. that the Via%mtii& srs a& to o b tm b qmp&tc dkovay. AAa a i s periodofES1diramEythepaticrwill~in~BSIphtbcwayin~ch thisdircavcrywillbs~ ~psmSrwillpioxitbthisdiauwmysothaSit occwearlyammgt~inthedircovarypcaiDdt~pmnit Vtaantotimdy w p p l m d its idd&&n of rrscaada@gbta sod dkpd infrinsing wcuka, andtopsrmicYou-meto*cppraprLbPdkemay~thcsearorlclaad allegcdinf. la. - Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 4 of 12 Mnrch7,2008-E.chplrtyagrrestoproduce 30-40~ans'~tsbythipdatc, Bnch cmtadim to be identified by the lupcahgparty d o r t h o ~ ~ p e r t y , l l the nqnestjng perty's option, a d jointly ~tiatedbythepartiestothiadtbc PrcmierLesguecrse,Puchas@tiunstohave c o a c W no i t than NoMmbsr 2 , .a 7 2007. AAa March 7,2008. tbe partics will use their best efforts to prodwe documents for ranaininpcu8~tobeidcntifiedwsoon M pnctiable afte~ March 7,2008. March 7, 2008willbe11~cbf0rt~*datefmo~~ ~Nstodial~wras.Thepatticsa~pse that docmmt +ti= will bc complstcd so thrttheparticswillhanrdcquatetimeto ~ - ~ t i ~ l ~ l b y ~ m S c p t e m k r 7.2MHIdrtc.DocmnentProduotimahallbc bYJuly7.m Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 5 of 12 v. TBE NAMES OP TEE PmSoNS TO BE DEP06P9: YIACOM: In m i a c with tho aged dcpasitian W a nc d a , ViacCm, intoods t ~ ~ t h s f o l l o w i n g p o o p l' I h i r ~ n n r y b o ~ b y V i a o o m ~ ~ c s a c e. pgmacs. Tldslirtdoeswtinchdsp~aanswithknowIodg~of~e'simd Y o u W r systems, ESI pmerwian efforts, former employ^^^ md thtd patics with mlcvam knowledge. (1) Eric Schmidt (12) (13) -M.ya Julio Pekmwic S u m Wojield (14) Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 6 of 12 (22) Bradley H O ~ E YOUTUBE: After dccummt discoMy has been exchanged, You'Me intad6 to dcpossthsfoUowhgpcople.Thia L i s t m s y b c n o d i f i c d a r m C c p r c ~In . additiw to the. list below, YcuTubs d m bo take 3@() dqmitiom on 0)6 ESI topics fr mlcvmt Viacom eatitier,to dcposs third parties with relevant o knowledgo rmd may depose folmsremployocr ofV i entities wi& rdevant b l * (2) Michael FrioLks stophaam (3) 7 ) Adam(8) () 9 (10) (11) Amy owd dl -Steve P m U Bob BIlrirh KluliPatcl (12) (13) (14) Jaron Witt Nada Stimtt Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 7 of 12 (17) Blair Hanisan UtCtFilippo (18) (19) ScOnRoeach (27) Joe S i (28) Imuk.~Dillm VI. STATEMENT OF ANY JJMITATIONS TO BE PLACED ON DISCOVERY, INCLUDING ANY PRoTBXlWE OR C O N F L D 0~ k FmtectiveOrdcrkruM. The partics have =ached agmenmt on all items in t e Pmtectivc Order. h 1. 2. Plainti& reserve the right to seek to modify the pmtectivo ada in orda t be pamitrad to sharo Md8ntial information with persons authorizbd o Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 8 of 12 to receive or nvicw such documcnb mother materials under a p t d w ordar entered i m Otbaa h Defrmdants contard tM it is not n v appmp&te for anyono o k h parties t this case and the Praia o Learms case to have access t ths d d a m i a I matericlls disclosed rmda o ~~- B. Tho pmtw have agreed to a dpulationreganling the mchmge of expert d d t s and d m t i o t l l l and a non-waiver stipuMi01~ I. Vicom ard YouTube have Dgrssd tbnt, to the c m @cable, x discovery will kcodhaid with Pranierhague v. YouTube, Case NO. 07 Civ 3582 ("Premier Leagw c h action"). Vhom. Remie~ League Limited and Bourne Co.arc jokily refeud t as "ths C o o Plaimiffs"f0rplnpasesofthisssction. AUparticstobothactions~tbst(i)~~sdinons~ ahallk~~inboth~onq(u~~mtalrcninane 2. action~lmdcsmsdtakeninbotb~,rmd(iii)~~esaPked amd~waedinollcaaionaballbcdeemedciskedmd~inboth actions. 3. Format of d i m m y . l l i e partia will negotiate a ES]Plan and agree to n rddrashndcopy~farmrtuprtof~pmporaL timrm;hrrlly~tobyttmpatirr,~withthedoua'r sckddiqader. UnlcnsolholrPbtrOrrsd~thcpPaies. d e p a i h u of6 m will ba M d at location specified by counssl for q s ths lwty p m w a g tbe wiblcss. D . TbebelowLrmiOtions-thtV~k.~whi~re~d p l a i a t i f f s , i n c ~ ~ a u m p l e , I f i l o g A t o m'P t,SpikcW,mdMTV Notwcukam~partofVi~onal,aw3rrrenot~~to be third partics forgrapostlof the below agrwment. ' ' E. The partics jointly p r q e x the fdlmving a d d i t i d limiratiom on dkovery: In an sffort to- c t affoas ard saermlinc discovery,the partias h v s agrsod to k the following Limits on the tiate of depwitions: 1. Fact depositions: Thc Collective PlaintifEs may togsthsr taka up @ 225 hours of -tion testimony of YooTube witncsnes. The &~ective P may together takc up to 150 hounr of depoaitioa testimony of third pdm. YauTube Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 9 of 12 may take up to 225 how of dqwsiitiOn tertimolly of the CollsCtiw Plainti@, and 150horns of depontion tatbony of third plrties. This proposal: (a) Inchdo11 a mgxinnrm of 25 horn for esch side kx ESI depcsxiliona Mder Rule 3O(bX6). For example, YouTube may iakc up t 25 o hours ofBSI w& the ~ollcctiw i of s plain&, and &u thccoll~~~P~ia~(Pmaytakeiq,to25~0f ESI related dcposltions of YouTubc. @) Limits each fact wi doposition to 7hours, cxwpt 3O(bX6) ~tioms;pmvided.tbattbs~~smaycatsndthislimitaonby agrOemanforspccifdc~iticmsdwillcoopwtsingoodfaith toMChauchagnamnZandpm~thatifthepmth~ MCh~inaporticlrkrarcthc~g~mayseck (c) (d) ~ll~h~on~meCamtforgo0dcnuc; Assumer tbrt d o n of a parly counts agrina tha pr~y'# limits (OD( tbc paty tho noticed the dcpodtion); tine AssrmvsthstachpsrtyWgivagcodfiitb~~ofhowbng theywill~with~witnopl48houn,priortotbe~~ (a) m y rave 25 on the V i PhintitT8, sndlbVisPomPtiatifb~Umy-nuof25 mbmgamh 00 Def* (i) AniDtorroOlltorytbrtulaforaantaiupiaceof' " 51 01 f o r O I O h p * i n t i f i ~ ~ o a e ~ ~ . ~~ W ANTICIPATED n U D 8 OF EXPWT 'l'wmmw,I ANY . F Plaintiffs a n t i c i i that SrrpattcStimonywill i & mt necessarily bc Lindtdto, d, but h foltowing fields: a I. Technologicalk w a , including the opeadan of the Y o u W and Google vidsow~~ardfiI~DChnotogics.aadotbcrrclatod The YouTubc, &qle Video, and Google bu8imes.s models, khdiug tbc 1 contribution of ~ u t h wo h~ e d content to the c g t success of YouTubs and Google. 2 . Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 10 of 12 601 Thirtsgfh ShKZ N.W. ~1UX)South Wssbinntan.DC ZUl05-3823 Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 11 of 12 Susan 1.Kohlmmn Pdcr H Harma . Ma#hswW.AlsdoIf JQLI~GI Block LLP & 919 Third Avenue 3 t Floor 7h New YorL, NY 10022 Tclcphona (212)891-1690 Facdmile (212)891-1699 SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP Stuart I. Baskin (SB-9936) Stephen Fi&bd~~ (SP-3410) Jolm Oueli (JG-8427) 599 LodDgtonAvt~ue New Y & NY 10022 o Tclepboae (212)S46400 Fauimils (212)848-7179 WILSON ~6N6~n OODDRlCH st R M P.C. 6% Page Ml Rod' il Pnlo Alto, CA 94304 Tonia Marie Orwllctte Khucraor Emily Alice Smith W i h Saasini OooQich& Rosati P C .. 1301 Avc~lns m AmaricPr o 40th PLr. New York.NY 10019 Telephone (212)999-5800 Fa & l (212)999-5899 BARTLIT BECK RERMAN PALBNCHAR & SCOTT LLP Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 12 of 12 Philip S. Beck Mark S.Ouwelcm Rcbscca Weinskin Bacon (Ino hac pending) ~ S . C o a L Carrie k Jablonski Camthouse Place 54 W.H b a S ubd t . suitc 300 Chicago, I 60610 L . .. . . Tclcphmc (3 1)4 9 4 4 6 5 2 Pmimile (312) 4944440 . . , .--,; .-. . . . .. . : - .:,, ., . , .,. .. . , X PROVISION FOR APPROVAL OF TEE COUL1T AND SIGNATURE LLN& FOR Tae COURT Dated: NswYork,NovYak ~uys1$2~ L HONORAIUg LOIfLO L STANTON, U.S.DJ. . .JL& r'
flag this doc
49
0
not rated
0
4/15/2008
English
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 80

justia 4/9/2008 | 15 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 23

justia 4/9/2008 | 37 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 25

justia 4/9/2008 | 27 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 33

justia 4/9/2008 | 24 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 46

justia 4/9/2008 | 23 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 49

justia 4/9/2008 | 32 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 86

justia 4/9/2008 | 29 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 72

justia 4/15/2008 | 23 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 2

justia 4/9/2008 | 91 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 3

justia 4/9/2008 | 94 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 5

justia 4/9/2008 | 92 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 6

justia 4/9/2008 | 60 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 9

justia 4/9/2008 | 67 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 11

justia 4/9/2008 | 62 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al - 13

justia 4/9/2008 | 53 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 81

justia 4/16/2008 | 402 | 3 | 0 | legal
Preview

Taylor et al v. Acxiom Corporation et al - 62

justia 4/16/2008 | 313 | 3 | 0 | legal
Preview

Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al v. RDR Books et al - 73

justia 4/16/2008 | 296 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Stiener et al v. Apple, Inc. et al - 73

justia 4/16/2008 | 473 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Trujillo v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al - 86

justia 4/16/2008 | 571 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Ticketmaster LLC v. RMG Technologies Inc et al - 105

justia 4/16/2008 | 271 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al - 51

justia 4/16/2008 | 320 | 1 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 78

justia 4/16/2008 | 275 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 79

justia 4/16/2008 | 291 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 75

justia 4/16/2008 | 371 | 0 | 0 | legal
 
review this doc