Combined Motion by anonymoms

VIEWS: 2 PAGES: 2

									                           IN THE DISTRICT COURT
              THIRD JUDICIAL DISTICT, SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS
                                DIVISION FOUR

IN THE MATTER OF
HALLECK G. RICHARDSON,
AND;                                                   Case No. 96D-217

CLAUDINE DOMBROWSKI
__________________________________
Pursuant to K.S.A. CHAPTER 60


            COMBINED MOTION ;1)TO MODIFY VISITATION ;
2) TO ORDER CO-OPERATION OF PARTIES WITH THERAPIST TO ASSIST
     IN VISITATION ISSUES, INTEGRATION AND EXCHANGES; 3) TO
   ENFORCE PRIOR ORDER’S OF TELEPHONE AND EMAIL CONTACT


Points.

          Respondent/Mother has obtained an evaluation, Per the April 2006 Orders of this
          Court. Showing that Respondent is not a threat or harm, neither to herself nor to
          her daughter.

          The Court removed both the Motion setting for July 27th.And the Status setting on
          Aug 9th, 2006.

      The Court then issued a letter dated July 27th, 2006. To Mary Ann Dugan,
      Therapist and Cc: to Jill Dykes and Don Hoffman with the above stated evaluation
      attached.



   1) The Courts letter ‘understands’ that Ms. Dugan is willing to assist in the visitation
      issues with mother and her daughter, and ‘strongly urged’ Ms. Dugan to make
      contact with the GAL and Hoffman.,’ to assist in resolving the complexities of the
      visitation herein.

   2) On Aug._(3) ?. 2006. Ms Dugan made contact with GAL via phone. The GAL
      refused to allow Ms. Dugan to ‘assist’ in any visitation issue resolutions; to
      include but not limited to, ‘exchange’ location for un-supervised visitation; As
      well as any re-integration and/or therapy between mother child.
     The GAL has further denied the therapist to have any contact at all with minor
     child.


  3) Mr. Hoffman has never returned any Ms Dugan’s phone calls this past month.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



  4) October 2005 Order of the Court; for mother and daughter to have email and
     twice weekly phone contact (up to thirty minutes each in duration), is not
     occurring completely.

   7) There have been NO Email contact since the Order , however mother has
      mailed via US Postal Service a card or letter every week this past 11 months.

  8) The ordered twice weekly phone calls have dwindled down this past four months
      to approximately one „successful‟ call weekly. i.e. „family‟ plans, friends and
     school or homework. And or” Rikki is gone” or “in the shower”. “With her sister,
     out of town” etc…

								
To top