Security by fdjerue7eeu


?First, the "security" of basic meaning
In ancient Chinese, and there is no "security", but
"security" under the word has on many occasions expressed the
modern Chinese "security" meaning, expressing the commonly
understood     "security"         concept.      For     example,     the
"gentleman's safety and forget the actual occurrence of danger,
survival and forget death, and do not forget to chaos, is to protect the national security
body also." ("Yi Jing ? Under"), where
"security" is and "crises" relative, and as
"crises"        of    the     modern      Chinese      expression     of
"danger" as "security" is expressed by
"security" concept.

"Security" as a fundamental words in modern Chinese, modern
Chinese dictionaries in a variety of explanations has basically the same.
"Modern Chinese Dictionary", "security"
interpretation of the word's first 4 are: "Peace; security (with the
'crisis'       relatively)",     cited   "public
security",      "order",       "Turning       the
Tide" as a case of the word. On "safe" explanation is:
"There is no danger; not a threat; no accident." "Ci
Hai" to "On" The first interpretation is that the word
"security", and with the national security implications of the
move a "national policy ? Qi policy 6" remark as an example:
"this country has been set, but Sajik has On carry on. "

When the Chinese "security" is used to refer to the English
translation, you can correspond with the major safety and security are two words,
although these two words have different meanings and usage, but meaning can be
different with the Chinese "security" correspond. Here, contact
with national security, "security", is security. Explained
according to the English dictionary, security and has many meanings, which often Pi
national security Di experts and scholars of the Han Yi Ti Dao has two aspects, one
was Zhi security of the state, that is free from risk, Moyoukongju; the other hand, is
that right security, maintenance, safety measures and that security agencies.
?Second, there is no danger that the unique properties of security

The reason why the English people in the "security" translated
into    Chinese     "security",      while   the      Chinese
"security"         translation     into     English         of
"security", because "security" and
"security" has a common meaning, specifically, is that they
have said that a state of shared meaning, that means "freedom from
risk" or "no risk" status. This common meaning is
"safe" the basic meaning of the word. Therefore, there is no
danger that the unique properties of security is the essential attribute.

Be noted that, both in the dictionary, or in academic research, people often secure and
"not at stake", "no accident" and together,
but we can not believe that "there is no threat" "no
accident", "not against" the special property is safe.
Security is definitely not a threat, not an accident, not against, but not a threat, not an
accident, not abuse does not necessarily secure. Some insecurity may also have
"no threat" or "not at stake," the property.
For example, when a subject is not subject to external threats but internal factors and
not because of safety, free from the threat has become such a special case of unsafe
properties. This is a threat or no threat from a state of insecurity.

Therefore, "there is no threat" and "free from
threats",     "no         accident",       "not
against" and so on, is not unique to the safety of property.

So, what is safe and properties unique to it? Security-specific attribute is
"no danger." One is no external threat, not a security-specific
attributes; alone is not intrinsic disorder, nor is it unique security attributes. However,
there is no threat and did not include such disorders both within and outside the
"no risk" is a unique attribute of the security.
?Third, security is the main objective is not dangerous to the state
There is no danger that the unique attributes of security, which can be said that the
state of security is not dangerous.

State is safe and without risk, and this state is failing to subjective will of man, which
is objective. Subject itself, whether it is safe or secure the main body of the onlookers,
not only because of the feeling or understanding of the safety of the main differences
in the subject real change in security status. Has been in free fall under a person, not
because of his feel good about themselves while the real security; a sturdy building a
solid lying in the big bed and do not in any danger of people, they will not consider
themselves at stake on the truth of risk. Therefore, security is not only there is no
danger of the state, and this state is an objective, non-subjective will of man.

Without risk, as an objective state, not a physical existence, but a property, so it is
bound to a certain degree of physical dependence. When the security attached to
person, so that "human security"; when the security attached to
country, it is the "national security"; and when the security
attached to the world, and is "the world's security."
Some entities that carry security, which is attached to the safety of the entity, it can be
said that the main security. Objective of the security state, must be attached to a
certain subject. In the definition of "security" must be the
security is a property of this feature and not an entity is reflected. Therefore, further

Safety is the main objective is not dangerous state.

Because security is the objective, so it is two different concepts of security, its own
sense of security that does not include subjective elements. Some people think that
security is both an objective state, it is a subjective state (attitude). We believe that
security as a state objective, it is not does not include the subjective feelings, or even
that it has no subjective component, is failing to subjective desire for the transfer of
objective reality.

Sense of security may not be reduced to the security aspect of the content, but it is
also an objective existence of the subjective state of security issues in the study of
national security issues including the need to study. But an objective state of security
is different, a sense of security can be said that the security principal on its own
security state of a self-awareness, self-evaluation. This self-awareness and
self-evaluation and objective comparison of security status are sometimes consistent,
sometimes very different. For example, some people feel more secure state is very
unsafe, all day long in that at-risk; also some people who, though in a more dangerous
situation, but think they are safe, the risk of turning a blind eye. This phenomenon
shows a sense of security and safety in addition to the actual state is not entirely
consistent,      but      also      shows       "security"        and
"security" are two different concepts.
?4, "no risk" the basic meaning of
"No danger" includes no external threats and internal disorder
not both.

"No threat", although not unique to the safety of property, but
"no risk" of this security must include the unique properties of
contents. In fact, from both internal and external point of view, "no
risk" includes no external danger and no risk inherent in two aspects, there
is no external danger is no external threat, there is no inherent danger is no intrinsic

From the external side, "no threat" from the main object (not the
subjective and objective) and its conditions in which three factors or reasons of the

From the main body, said, "no threat" because the principal has
the ability to remove the threat, that is its own powerful external factors or
characteristics make certain they do not pose a threat, that is itself exempt from this
threat, and therefore "not threat. "

From the object perspective, "no threat" is the relationship
between objects, living environment, or the absence of the object's ability
to threaten a particular subject does not constitute the main threat, or because there is
no threat to the performance and behavior of a particular subject and therefore do

To top