Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC Document 728-2 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 11of 11 Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC Document 729 Filed 06/22/2007 Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DATATREASURY CORPORATION Plaintiff vs. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY; WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al Defendants § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 2:06cv72 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ALTER DEADLINES On this date came to be considered the Unopposed Motion to Alter Deadlines filed by Plaintiff, DataTreasury Corporation. The Court, having considered the evidence contained therein, finds that it has merit and should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the deadlines for Plaintiff and Defendant to file their respective Response and Reply to Defendant The Clearing House Payment Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Noninfringement of the ‘868 Patent are as follows: DOCUMENT Plaintiff’s Response Brief to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment for Noninfringement of ‘868 Patent Defendant’s Reply Brief to Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment for Noninfringement of ‘868 Patent PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE DUE August 6, 2007 DEFENDANT’S REPLY DUE . September 5, 2007 SIGNED this 25th day of June, 2007. ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ALTER DEADLINES ____________________________________ PAGE 1 DAVID FOLSOM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE