Skillern v. Moody - 3

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
22
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
pages:
0
Case 6:07-cv-00031-BAE-GRS Document 3 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISIO N IN RE WARREN SKILLERN 606MC00 1 ORDE R In its 7/25/06 Order, this Court imposed its "28 U.S .C . § 1915(g)-plus-plus" remedy upon Warren Skillern . Doc . # 4, reconsideration denied, doe . # 7, appeal dismissed, doc . # 13 ; see also Barber v. U.S. Attorney General, 458 F .Supp .2d 1378 (S .D .Ga .2006) . In other words, the Court directed Skillern's jailers basically to block, for two years, anything further that Skillern might try to send to this Court : Doc . # 12 at 1 . Finally, the Court directed that, "[s]hould any Skillern envelope in the meantime manage to get through to this Court, the Clerk is directed to send it directly to the undersigned, without processing ." Id. Skillern has since filed two lawsuits in the Northern District of Georgia : Skillern v. Georgia State Administrators, 1 :07-CV-0999-WSD (N .D.Ga. 5/2/07), and Skillern v. Moody, 1 :07CV1000-WSD (N .D.Ga. filed 5/2/07) . That court just transferred those two cases to this Court and they have since been re-numbered : Skillern v. Georgia State Administrators, 607CV032 and Skillern v. Moody, 607CV03 1 . Before transferring those case , that court also blocked Skille rn' s No rthern-District - venuespecific habeas claims by invoking a Northern District injunction against further habeas filings . See 607CV032 at 2 ; 607CV031 at 2. But Skillern had slipped into those cases 42 U.S .C. § 1983 claims against defend ants located in this District, so the Northern District transferred both c as es here. 607CV032 at 3-4; 607CV031 at 3-4 . Under this Court' s 8/28/06 Order, both 607CV032 and 607CV031 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the Clerk shall file a copy of this Order in each of those case files . Meanwhile, Skillern has obviously elected to continue his paper-war against the courts by exploiting the "not other courts" gap in this Court's 7/25/06 Order. See doe. # 4 at I (excerpted above) . Thus, this Court now creates and applies here its 28 U .S.C. § 1915(g)-plusplus-plus-plus remedy. As previously noted, a mere "plus-plus-plus" remedy directs the State to Accordingly, the State of Georgia (hence, Skillern's current warden, any successors and their staff), is directed to open and inspect each and every outgoing envelope from Skillern that is addressed to this Court (including any member of its judicial and clerical staffs) and withhold postage from any envelope in any way intended to be sent to this Court (but not other courts like the state courts or Eleventh Circuit) except for a Notice of Appeal and any IFP motion in Skillern v. Smith, 606CV047 . Doc . # 4 at 1 (emphasis added). In its 8/28/06 Order, the Court further directed that all Warren Skillern motions that "leak through" the Court's ban on further filings of any kind, see doe. ## 4, 7, are automatically DENIED, and this Order shall be filed in any and all other Skillern cases for the purpose of denying such motions . All appeals that "leak through" shall not be processed . All "new filings" (motions, documents of any kind that bear no case number) shall be filed in this (606M0001) file. Case 6:07-cv-00031-BAE-GRS Document 3 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 2 of 2 block all of his mail to this Court irrespective of its content. Barber, 458 F.Supp .2d at 1381 . Under the new remedy, the State is now directed to block all Skillern mail to any federal (but not state) court . Finally, the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon all magistrate and district judges in this District, as well as upon the Attorney General of Georgia . This ay of May, 2007 . B.'AVANT EDENFIELD , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
Skillern v. Smith - 3
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
Skillern v. Paul - 4
Views: 35  |  Downloads: 0
Skillern v. Smith et al - 2
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
Taylor v. Hart - 4
Views: 62  |  Downloads: 0
Johnson v. Chase et al - 4
Views: 38  |  Downloads: 0
SMITH v. HARRIS et al - 6
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 0
Moss v. Akuawanne et al - 4
Views: 40  |  Downloads: 0
Workman v Bredesen (07a0162p-06)
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
AMERICAN STATES INS V DASTAR CORP (01-35412)
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
NORTHANTS CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOCIATION
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0