professional documents
home
Profile
docsters
request
Blogs
Upload
user photo
Tim Stanley
Programmer
Justia
Murray v. Newman et al Doc. 3 Case 3:07-cv-05215-RBL-KLS Document 3 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, does hereby find and ORDER. (1) Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security therefor. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED. As set forth below, an initial partial filing fee will be collected, and plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding months income credited to his/her account until the full amount of the filing fee is satisfied. (2) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and plaintiff’s approved application to proceed in forma pauperis, the agency having custody of the above named plaintiff is directed to calculate an initial partial filing fee equal to 20 percent of greater of -- the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account or the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date of this Order. The initial partial filing fee should be forwarded to the court clerk as soon as practicable. Subsequently, if the prisoner’s account exceeds $10.00, each month the Department of Corrections v. ROBERT WILSON, Defendant. MARK T. MURRAY, Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND FORWARD PAYMENTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Case No. C07-5238FDB ORDER Page - 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:07-cv-05215-RBL-KLS Document 3 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 is directed to collect and forward payments equal to 20 percent of the prisoner’s preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. In the event that the monthly payment would reduce the prisoner’s account below $10.00, the Department of Corrections should collect and forward only that amount which would reduce the prisoner’s account to the $10.00 level. Please note that this $10.00 limit does not apply to the initial partial filing fee described above. Finally, the monthly payments should be collected and forwarded to the court until the entire filing fee ($250.00) for this matter has been paid. (3) The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order, and a copy of this Order along with a copy of plaintiff’s Acknowledgement and Authorization portion of the IFP application to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) contact person, the inmate account manager at Grays Harbor County Jail, c/o the Grays Harbor County Sheriff’s Office. DATED this 15th day of May, 2007. /s/ J. Kelley Arnold J. Kelley Arnold United States Magistrate Judge ORDER Page - 2
flag this doc
21
0
not rated
0
4/15/2008
English
Preview

Murray v. Newman et al - 6

justia 4/15/2008 | 22 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Murray v. Newman et al - 5

justia 4/15/2008 | 17 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

(PC) Newman v. Gonzales et al - 3

justia 4/15/2008 | 28 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Newman v. Bruce et al - 4

justia 4/15/2008 | 25 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Murray v. Christenson et al - 31

justia 4/14/2008 | 9 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

JALOZA et al v. NEWMAN et al - 9

justia 4/15/2008 | 20 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Kenneth Hurst, Et Al. v. Steve Newman, Et Al. - 20

justia 4/14/2008 | 23 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Kenneth Hurst, Et Al. v. Steve Newman, Et Al. - 24

justia 4/14/2008 | 22 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Kenneth Hurst, Et Al. v. Steve Newman, Et Al. - 19

justia 4/14/2008 | 34 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Murray et al v. Alulim Willow Property Group, LLC et al - 3

justia 4/9/2008 | 6 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Murray v. Wilson - 3

justia 4/15/2008 | 19 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Murray v. Allen et al (INMATE1) - 7

justia 4/15/2008 | 20 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Hernandez v. Murray et al - 3

justia 4/14/2008 | 14 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

White v. Murray et al - 3

justia 4/15/2008 | 6 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Curley v. Murray et al - 4

justia 4/14/2008 | 13 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 81

justia 4/16/2008 | 402 | 3 | 0 | legal
Preview

Taylor et al v. Acxiom Corporation et al - 62

justia 4/16/2008 | 313 | 3 | 0 | legal
Preview

Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al v. RDR Books et al - 73

justia 4/16/2008 | 296 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Stiener et al v. Apple, Inc. et al - 73

justia 4/16/2008 | 473 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Trujillo v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al - 86

justia 4/16/2008 | 571 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Ticketmaster LLC v. RMG Technologies Inc et al - 105

justia 4/16/2008 | 271 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al - 51

justia 4/16/2008 | 320 | 1 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 78

justia 4/16/2008 | 275 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 79

justia 4/16/2008 | 291 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 75

justia 4/16/2008 | 371 | 0 | 0 | legal
 
review this doc