TRENDS VS. DRIVING FORCES, A CLARITY PATHWAY BEFORE A UNIVERSAL MANAGEMENT AND SCIENTIFIC BLUNDER! By (c) Copyright 2010 by Andres Agostini http://bit.ly/Trends-Vs-Driving-Forces by omnisciczar

VIEWS: 168 PAGES: 37

More Info
									Conceived, developed, manufactured

and instituted by:

     By © Copyright 2010 Andres Agostini – All Rights Reserved –

     www.linkedin.com/in/AndresAgostini
     www.twitter.com/SciCzar
     www.Futuretronium.blogspot.com
 ?? ? ?
? ? ??
TRENDS do never
      EVER
equate to DRIVING
    FORCES!
1 Snapshot?

Trend?

1 POV?

1 Perspective?

1 View?




     of this:
RED COLOR
  IS FOR
DYNAMICS
Is this over-simplified
“summation” (that is,
   “TREND”) enough
 to understimate the
      dynamics of
   DRIVING FORCES?
    ONE SNAPSHOT
  IS MEDIOCRE AND
  OVER-SIMPLISTIC
AND OVER-INACCURATE
   TREND’S IMAGE,
   LITERALLY! (SIC)
       ONE POV
  IS MEDIOCRE AND
   OVER-SIMPLISTIC
AND OVER-INACCURATE
    TREND’S IMAGE,
    LITERALLY! (SIC)
       ONE VIEW
  IS MEDIOCRE AND
   OVER-SIMPLISTIC
AND OVER-INACCURATE
    TREND’S IMAGE,
    LITERALLY! (SIC)
      ONE IMAGE
  IS MEDIOCRE AND
   OVER-SIMPLISTIC
AND OVER-INACCURATE
    TREND’S IMAGE,
    LITERALLY! (SIC)
ONE BRIEF NARRATIVE
  IS MEDIOCRE AND
  OVER-SIMPLISTIC
AND OVER-INACCURATE
   TREND’S IMAGE,
   LITERALLY! (SIC)
                                    STATI C
                     STATI C
                                 AND MEDIOCRE
                  AND MEDIOCRE
                                     TALK
                      TALK

      STATI C

   AND MEDIOCRE

       TALK



   STATI C

AND MEDIOCRE

    TALK


    STATI C

 AND MEDIOCRE

      TALK
             “TRENDS” – SO-CALLED –
       ARE JUST CHATTY MARKETER’S
  TALK! YOU CAN NOW – FOR THE SAKE
OF YOUR OWN DISGRACE – CHOOSE THE
                     SUBOPTIOMAL?
         THE UNAMBIGUOUS AND MOST DESCRIPTIVE
         EXPLANATION OF THE DRIVING FORCES ARE
    THEORETICAL, PRACTICAL AND EMPIRICAL EXERCISES
      OF SCIENCE THROUGH (I) THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD,
  (II) THE SYSTEMS APPROACH, (III) THE IMPLEMENTATION
  OF THE APPLIED OMNISCIENCE, BASED ON IMMENSE AND
            SUBTLE REALITIES, EVIDENCES, FACTS,
              FIGURES, SCIENCE, ART, PRACTICE,
“DOGGED” TRUTH-SEEKING. YOU CAN NOW – FOR THE SAKE
          OF YOUR OWN WELL-BEING – CHOOSE THE
                 MAXIMUM OF THE OPTIMUM!
Futurists speak a great deal about
“TRENDS” because they can only
offer a portion of their lavish and
 complicated findings about the
          driving forces!
You speak in detail about the
DRIVING FORCES to your customer
or client. Elicitation is not
pro bono since the underlying
work is arduous and hence
expensive regardless of the
earth’s paradigm.

You can offer a summation but
only and always supported by
ohe numerical and narrative
data and discernment to
elucidate and elicitate the
DRIVING FORCES!
What does the “silly”
word “FORCE” mean
   in actuality?
  WHY DO WE LOVE
  SO DEARLY THESE
POLITICALLY CORRECT
 “TREND SETTERS”?
  WHY DO WE LOVE
  SO DEARLY THESE
POLITICALLY CORRECT
 “TREND SETTERS”?
“TREND” PEOPLE: Market baby, market baby!

“TREND” PEOPLE: Sell baby, sell baby!

“TREND” PEOPLE: Don’t manufacture baby, do not baby!

“TREND” PEOPLE: Keep it Simple Stupid baby, go for the loser’s KISS!

“TREND” PEOPLE: Don’t SCIENCE baby, do not baby!

“TREND” PEOPLE: Don’t FUTURE your enterprise baby, do not baby!

“TREND” PEOPLE: Don’t understand the fundamental DRIVERS baby,
do not baby!
AMBIGUOUS AND   OVER-ACCURATE AND
 INCOMPLETE      OVER-THOROUGH
 How is “DRIVING
FORCES” defined?
  For instance:
          TO UNDERSTAND THE
          “DRIVING FORCES” –
            BOTH DRAMATIC
     AND SUBTLE ONES – ONE MUST
         HAVE EXPERIENCE AND
     EXPERTISE IN MULTIDISPLINARY
FIELDS AND ACT UPON, TO PUT IT BRIEFLY:

        1.- Applied omniscience
       ( http://bit.ly/d6d84w )

          2.- Scientific method

3.- Engineering, re-engineering approach

 4.- Systems approach (holistic thinking)
           THIS TIME OF SCIENTIFIC ACCOMPLISHMENT,
     THE TANGO PLAYWRIGHT IS ALONG THESE SINUOUS
                                             LINES:

                                            (BEFORE)

                         “The Economy first, stupid.”

                                              (NOW)

“In order to get the ECONOMY RIGHT AND FIRST STUPID,
 first and foremost the SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGIES OF
                              SAID ECONOMY, SAVANT!”
MOST GRAVE PROBLEMS WITH STANDARD SEMANTICS
AND UNIVERSAL MISUNDERSTANDING!

1.- Many people especially in the English-speaking West are
always mentioning that people, say, “Misbehave” because they have
a problem of “ATTITUDE.”

Let me set the record straight once again:

1.1.- Attitude is only a function of awareness.

1.2.- Good attitude is a function of optimum conscientious awareness.

1.3.- Bad attitude is a function of lack of optimum conscientious awareness.

... Likewise ...
“TRENDS” – so-called – are a brief and over-simplistic and
incomplete summation of DRIVING FORCES (both subtle
and dramatic ones).

Too many academicians, scholars, erudite ones, researchers,
authors – among a plethora of people of learning – that
utilize lavishly the term “trend” as if they were
talking about “driving forces.”

This universally used blunder is confusing in moments that
discerning many aspects (laden with vast nuance) about change
and its impact is having in every dimension and
facet of organizational, professional, societal, and personal life.
   MY OWN DEFINITION
OF “APPLIED OMNISCIENCE”
            AT:

   http://bit.ly/d6d84w
MY TWITTER AT:

www.twitter.com/SciCzar
POINT OF
CONTACT AT:

www.linkedin.com/in/AndresAgostini
MY BOOK:

http://Futuretronium.blogspot.com
MORE     RESOURCES          A T:

www.linkedin.com/in/AndresAgostini
Conceived, developed, manufactured

and instituted by:

     By © Copyright 2010 Andres Agostini – All Rights Reserved –

     www.linkedin.com/in/AndresAgostini
     www.twitter.com/SciCzar
     www.Futuretronium.blogspot.com

								
To top