Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Laning et al - 3

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
36
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Laning et al Doc. 3 Case 3:07-cv-00527-BEN-RBB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Document 3 Filed 04/09/2007 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B., a Federal corporation, Plaintiff, v. DAVID LANING, an individual, and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Defendant. In consideration of the joint motion of Defendant DAVID LANING and Plaintiff PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B., seeking transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Court has considered the motion and all pleadings and other papers on file in this action, and has concluded that transfer of this action to that venue would be in the interest of justice and for the convenience of the parties and witnesses. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the joint motion of Defendant DAVID and Plaintiff PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B., to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California is GRANTED. Case No.: 07-cv-0527 BEN RBB ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR TRANSFER OF VENUE TO THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ORDER ON JOINT MOTION FOR TRANSFER 114633.000001/693485.01 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:07-cv-00527-BEN-RBB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Document 3 Filed 04/09/2007 Page 2 of 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action be removed from the docket of this Court and transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California for any and all further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:April 9, 2007 Hon. Roger T. Benitez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 2 ORDER ON JOINT MOTION FOR TRANSFER 114633.000001/693485.01

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs