Carstens v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al - 6

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
43
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
pages:
0
Carstens v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al Doc. 6 Case 3:07-cv-01662-TEH Document 6 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Gordon & Rees LLP 633 West Fifth Street Suite 4900 Los Angeles, CA 90071 RONALD K. ALBERTS (SBN: 100017) GORDON & REES LLP 633 West Fifth Street Suite 4900 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 576-5000 Facsimile: (213) 680-4470 ralberts@gordonrees.com Attorneys for Defendant AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MELINDA CARSTENS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) AETNA LIFE INSURANCE ) COMPANY, THE UNITED STATES ) SHOE CORPORATION, and DOES 1- ) 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) TO THE COURT: The parties hereto, Plaintiff Melinda Carstens and Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS Aetna’s response to Plaintiff’s Complaint is due to be filed on or before March 29, 2007; WHEREAS Plaintiff’s counsel agrees to permit Aetna to file and serve its answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before April 6, 2007. WHEREAS Plaintiff’s consent to additional time for Aetna to answer shall not be deemed to be consent to the propriety of Aetna’s removal, or consent to -1- CASE NO. C 07 1662 TEH STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME OF DEFENDANT AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY TO ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AETNA/1044422/108951v.1 STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME OF DEFENDANT AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY TO ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:07-cv-01662-TEH Document 6 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Gordon & Rees LLP 633 West Fifth Street Suite 4900 Los Angeles, CA 90071 federal jurisdiction and Aetna agrees not to rely upon Plaintiff’s consent to additional time to advance any argument that Plaintiff has consented to federal jurisdiction or to the propriety of Aetna’s removal. IT IS SO STIPULATED: DATED: March 29, 2007 LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON By: /S/________________________ Cassie Springer-Sullivan Attorneys for Plaintiff MELINDA CARSTENS DATED: March 29, 2007 GORDON & REES By: /S/________________________ Ronald K. Alberts Attorneys for Defendant AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNIT ED S 17 S DISTRICT TE C TA Ju ER N F D IS T IC T O R -2- STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME OF DEFENDANT AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY TO ANSWER TO COMPLAINT A 04/02/07 C LI FO lton E. H dge The enderso n R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs