(PC) Davis v. Knowles et al - 4

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
17
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
(PC) Davis v. Knowles et al Doc. 4 Case 2:07-cv-00416-LKK-DAD Document 4 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. KNOWLES, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, the certificate portion of the request which must be completed by plaintiff’s institution of incarceration has not been filled out. Also, plaintiff has not filed a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit a completed in forma pauperis application and a certified copy in support of his application. ///// ///// ///// 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRYAN DAVIS, SR., Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0416 LKK DAD P ORDER Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00416-LKK-DAD Document 4 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /bb davi0416.3c+ In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court; 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and 3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. DATED: March 9, 2007. 2

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
(PC) Holgerson v. Knowles et al - 3
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Fuentes v. Knowles et al - 6
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Garland v. Knowles et al - 6
Views: 12  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Fuentes v. Knowles et al - 5
Views: 25  |  Downloads: 0
(DLB) (PC) Bradford v. Knowles et al - 5
Views: 15  |  Downloads: 0
(DLB) (PC) Bradford v. Knowles et al - 6
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Jensen v. Knowles, et al - 63
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Davis v. Calvin et al - 16
Views: 21  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Davis v. Chapparro, et al - 7
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 0
(PC)Davis v. CDC,et al. - 8
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Tyler v. Davis et al - 8
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Davis v. Compean, et al - 3
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Doyle Wayne Davis v. Lewis, et al - 12
Views: 19  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Bright v. Schwarzenegger et al - 2
Views: 20  |  Downloads: 0