Morgan Stanley DW, Inc. v. Johnson - 12

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
57
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
pages:
0
Morgan Stanley DW, Inc. v. Johnson Doc. 12 Case 4:07-cv-00760-CW Document 12 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PATRICK J. FOLAN (STATE BAR #125340) STEVEN W. BRENNAN (STATE BAR #110256) ST. JOHN, WALLACE, BRENNAN & FOLAN LLP 21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 1120 Torrance, California 90503-6504 Telephone: (310) 792-1075 Facsimile: (310) 792-0635 E-mail: pjfolan@swbf.net Attorneys for Plaintiff Morgan Stanley DW Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Rosemary Johnson, an individual, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ______________________________________ ) Morgan Stanley DW Inc., a corporation, CASE NO. CV07-00760 CW Assigned to Hon. Claudia Wilken Courtroom 2 STIPULATION RE ENTRY OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND ORDER THEREON STIPULATION 20 Plaintiff Morgan Stanley DW Inc. (“Morgan Stanley”) and defendant Rosemary Johnson 21 (“Johnson” or “Defendant”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 22 1. 23 injunction: 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION RE ENTRY OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON The parties hereby agree to the Court’s entry of the following preliminary Dockets.Justia.com Case 4:07-cv-00760-CW Document 12 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Based on the parties’ Stipulation above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT: A. A preliminary injunction shall be issued immediately. Defendant is hereby enjoined and restrained, directly or indirectly, whether acting alone or in concert with others, including any officer, agent, representative, and/or employee of Defendant’s new employer, Cochrane & Associates, from: 1. Soliciting any business from any client or customer whom Defendant served as a sales assistant during her employment with Morgan Stanley, or any other customer or client of Morgan Stanley whose name became known to Defendant while in the employ of Morgan Stanley; 2. Contacting for business purposes, whether in person, through others, by telephone or in writing, any client or customer of Morgan Stanley whom Defendant served as a sales assistant during her employment with Morgan Stanley or whose name became known to Defendant while employed by Morgan Stanley; and 3. Using, disclosing, or transmitting for any purpose (including but not limited to the solicitation of said clients or customers), any information contained in the records of Morgan Stanley, including but not limited to the names, addresses, and financial information of said clients or customers. B. Within 48 hours of entry of this Order by the Court, Defendant is hereby required to return to Morgan Stanley’s counsel, Patrick J. Folan, all originals, copies, or other reproductions, in any form whatsoever, of any document or other form of recorded Morgan Stanley information, and to purge and destroy any computerized record of Morgan Stanley that is within Defendant’s possession, custody or control. C. In view of the nature of the controversy and Morgan Stanley's financial condition, a bond is deemed to be unnecessary. This Order shall remain in full force and effect until April 8, 2007. 2 STIPULATION RE ENTRY OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON Case 4:07-cv-00760-CW Document 12 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2/8/07 14 Dated:___________________ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION RE ENTRY OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON DATED: February 7, 2007 ST. JOHN, WALLACE, BRENNAN & FOLAN LLP By:___________________________________ Patrick J. Folan (State Bar #125340) Attorneys for Plaintiff Morgan Stanley DW Inc. DATED: February 7, 2007 STEEFEL LEVITT & WEISS By:___________________________________ Michael D. Early (State Bar #111459) Attorneys for Defendant Rosemary Johnson IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ Hon. Claudia Wilken United States District Court Judge

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. v. Howarth et al - 12
Views: 46  |  Downloads: 0
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. v. Barcza - 9
Views: 51  |  Downloads: 0
Stowell v. Morgan Stanley DW, Inc - 1
Views: 39  |  Downloads: 0
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. v. Collison et al - 13
Views: 76  |  Downloads: 0
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. v. Collison et al - 24
Views: 40  |  Downloads: 0
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. v. Fieger - 7
Views: 57  |  Downloads: 0
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. v. Barcza - 13
Views: 41  |  Downloads: 0
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. v. Duncan - 9
Views: 58  |  Downloads: 0
Kroneberger v. Morgan Stanley DW, Inc. - 9
Views: 46  |  Downloads: 0
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. v. White - 4
Views: 82  |  Downloads: 0
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. v. Siegel - 10
Views: 55  |  Downloads: 0
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. v. Hall et al - 15
Views: 33  |  Downloads: 0