(HC) Sanders v. State of California et al
Doc. 5
Case 2:07-cv-00154-RRB-DAD
Document 5
Filed 01/31/2007
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Although petitioner states in her request for appointment of counsel that she is indigent, she has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) & 1915(a). Petitioner will be granted thirty days to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. After petitioner submits a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, the court will entertain petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel and her motion to hold these proceedings in abeyance pending disposition of a state habeas petition filed in the California Supreme Court on December 15, 2006. ///// ///// 1
Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TRINA RENEE SANDERS, Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-0154 DFL DAD P
ORDER
Case 2:07-cv-00154-RRB-DAD
Document 5
Filed 01/31/2007
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:13:bb sand0154.101a
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days after this order is filed, an application to proceed in forma pauperis; any request for extension of time to comply with this order should be filed before the thirty-day period expires; petitioner is cautioned that failure to comply with court orders may result in sanctions or a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district in habeas corpus proceedings. DATED: January 31, 2007.
2