Prymak et al v. Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. et al - 2

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
200
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
pages:
0
Prymak et al v. Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. et al Doc. 2 Case 1:07-cv-00103-EWN-KLM Document 2 Filed 01/19/2007 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 07-cv-00103-MSK-PAC JOHN PRYMAK, LILLIAN PRYMAK, PAUL PRYMAK, PRESTON SMITH, SHEILA SMITH, RITCHIE SMITH, JANE SPECKETER, ANTHONY PISANI, PATRICIA PISANI, LESLIE DAVIS, MARJORIE DALE DAVIS, DARREL LONGLEY, VERA LONGLEY, ROBERT DALEY, BRENDA DALEY, KENNETH N. PORCHETTA, LINDA RADLEY, MARIE MLACNIK, THE TUCKER FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLP, RICHARD WARREN, HELEN BARKER, GARY WHITAKER, PHYLLIS WHITAKER, MARCY RICE, JAMES RICE, MICHAEL J. VETTE, BRYAN VETTE, WILLIAM J. KITCHING, FLOROANN MILANN, HELENA LOEWEN, RUSSELL A. BUTTACAVOLI, RICHARD BRICE, PAULA BRICE, CHAD LUCERO, SHAWN CULLEN, JONATHAN SENDOR, VIRGINIA SENDOR, JILL SENDOR-LAYCHAK, DOUGLAS LAYCHAK, Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:07-cv-00103-EWN-KLM Document 2 Filed 01/19/2007 Page 2 of 3 ALI GIDFAR, MARYAM ZIRAKZAKEH, MANOUCHEHR ZIRAKZADEH, SHAHIN ZIRAKZADEH, CHARLES B. DAVIS, CHRISTOPHER OLSON, SANDY OLSON TEDD SABUS, TIMOTHY J. GILLACH, LISA SEEBERGER, SCOTT SEEBERGER, JOAN E. McELWAIN, HARLEY J. KIRSCHENMANN, CAROL J. KIRSCHENMANN, PRISCILLA J. DRESSEN, LEROY MATTICKS, EDWARD MORROW, ROBERTA MORROW, IRENE VALVERDE, ROBERT VALVERDE, JAMES FAVILLE, MARIAN FAVILLE, DAVID SOBERNHEIM, MYRNA SOBERNHEIM JAMES E. LOSHER, ROBERT WESTON, and VELVA WESTON, Plaintiffs, v. CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC., and MUTUAL SERVICE CORPORATION, Defendants. ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions to be used during this case, counsel for the parties shall obtain such exhibits and depositions from the Court within 30 days Case 1:07-cv-00103-EWN-KLM Document 2 Filed 01/19/2007 Page 3 of 3 after any judgment is entered or closure of the case. Counsel shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. Failure to retrieve exhibits and depositions in conformance with this Order may result in their destruction. Dated this 18th day of January, 2007 BY THE COURT: Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs