(PS) Sanders v. Aranas et al - 4

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
16
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
(PS) Sanders v. Aranas et al Doc. 4 Case 1:06-cv-01574-AWI-SMS Document 4 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 v. 13 OFFICER C. ARANAS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with an action for damages and other relief concerning alleged civil rights violations. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-304. On November 6, 2006, Plaintiff filed a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application to proceed in forma pauperis was not legible. Accodingly, Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff IS DIRECTED either to pay the $350.00 filing fee or to file a completed application to proceed in forma 1 Dockets.Justia.com PHILLIP SANDERS, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:06-cv-1574-AWI-SMS ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF EITHER TO PAY THE $350.00 FILING FEE OR TO FILE A COMPLETED AND LEGIBLE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER (DOC. 2) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO SEND TO PLAINTIFF A BLANK APPLICATION FORM TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FOR ONE NOT IN CUSTODY Case 1:06-cv-01574-AWI-SMS Document 4 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 pauperis no later than thirty days after the date of service of this order; and 2. The Clerk of Court IS DIRECTED to send to Plaintiff with this order a copy of a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis for one not in custody; and 3. Plaintiff is informed that a failure to comply in a timely fashion with the Court’s directions will be considered to be a failure to comply with an order of the Court within the meaning of Local Rule 11-110 and may result in dismissal of the action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 November 8, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
(PS) Sanders v. Aranas et al - 6
Views: 20  |  Downloads: 0
Sanders' Union Fourth Reader
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 0
(PS) Rivera et al v. Snow et al - 4
Views: 30  |  Downloads: 0
(PS)Harrell v. Oreck et al - 4
Views: 20  |  Downloads: 0
(PS) Kaur v. Gonzales et al - 4
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 0
(PS) Ramirez v. Cooley et al - 4
Views: 23  |  Downloads: 0
(PS) Brady v. Kelper et al - 4
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
(PS) Parlante v. Peterson et al - 4
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 0
(PS) Boyer et al v. Armstrong et al - 9
Views: 21  |  Downloads: 0
(PS) Loos et al v. Elkins et al - 8
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
(PS) Boyer et al v. Armstrong et al - 8
Views: 36  |  Downloads: 0
(PS)Ware v. Sacramento County et al - 4
Views: 23  |  Downloads: 0
(PS) Lee v. County of El Dorado et al - 4
Views: 23  |  Downloads: 0