professional documents
home
Upload
docsters
Upload
user photo
Tim Stanley
Programmer
Justia
Pitts v. Lay et al Doc. 3 Case 5:06-cv-00259-SWW Document 3 Filed 10/24/2006 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION KENNETH RAY BENTON PITTS, ADC #85938 v. WARDEN LAY, et al. 5:06CV00259SWW/HLJ DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff, a state inmate proceeding pro se, seeks relief in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (DE #1). Although plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by § 1915(a), his request to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The Court is required to screen complaints seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. §1915(a). Additionally, the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), provides that "[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on three (3) or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury." The Court notes that plaintiff has had several complaints dismissed for failure to state a claim.1 In addition, the Court finds that plaintiff Pitts has not alleged any facts to indicate that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 1 See 5:06cv01305, 5:99cv00071, and 5:99cv00178. Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:06-cv-00259-SWW Document 3 Filed 10/24/2006 Page 2 of 2 THEREFORE, plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (DE#1) is denied. Should plaintiff wish to continue this case, he shall submit the statutory filing fee of $350 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, along with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be reopened. The case is therefore dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of October, 2006. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
flag this doc
15
0
not rated
0
4/14/2008
English
Preview

Pitts v. Lay et al - 4

justia 4/14/2008 | 14 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

PITTS v. FRANCIS et al - 6

justia 4/9/2008 | 22 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

PITTS v. FRANCIS et al - 2

justia 4/9/2008 | 46 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

PITTS v. FRANCIS et al - 4

justia 4/9/2008 | 35 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

PITTS v. FRANCIS et al - 5

justia 4/9/2008 | 30 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

PITTS v. FRANCIS et al - 1

justia 4/16/2008 | 23 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Pitts v. Menard Correctional Center et al - 3

justia 4/14/2008 | 17 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Sherman v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al - 3

justia 4/15/2008 | 25 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Sherman v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al - 3

justia 4/15/2008 | 22 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Wiltgen v. State of Arkansas et al - 3

justia 4/14/2008 | 22 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Friends of Eudora Public School District of Chicot County Arkansas et al v. Beebe et al - 43

justia 4/15/2008 | 46 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Philpott v. Arkansas, State of et al - 8

justia 4/15/2008 | 33 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Beauchamp v. Arkansas, State of et al - 6

justia 4/14/2008 | 33 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Beauchamp v. Arkansas, State of et al - 5

justia 4/14/2008 | 24 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Beare v. Arkansas, State of et al - 12

justia 4/14/2008 | 16 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 81

justia 4/16/2008 | 501 | 4 | 0 | legal
Preview

Taylor et al v. Acxiom Corporation et al - 62

justia 4/16/2008 | 377 | 4 | 0 | legal
Preview

Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al v. RDR Books et al - 73

justia 4/16/2008 | 380 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Stiener et al v. Apple, Inc. et al - 73

justia 4/16/2008 | 584 | 3 | 0 | legal
Preview

Trujillo v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al - 86

justia 4/16/2008 | 657 | 4 | 0 | legal
Preview

Ticketmaster LLC v. RMG Technologies Inc et al - 105

justia 4/16/2008 | 354 | 1 | 0 | legal
Preview

EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al - 51

justia 4/16/2008 | 411 | 1 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 78

justia 4/16/2008 | 346 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 79

justia 4/16/2008 | 375 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 75

justia 4/16/2008 | 437 | 0 | 0 | legal
 
review this doc