professional documents
home
Upload
docsters
Upload
user photo
Tim Stanley
Programmer
Justia
Coleman v. Leahey Doc. 5 Case 2:06-cv-00324-UA-SPC Document 5 Filed 07/06/2006 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION LARRY COLEMAN, Plaintiff, vs. FNU LEAHEY, Defendant. ___________________________________ ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff, an inmate of the Florida penal system proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a civil rights complaint form (Doc. #1) on June 30, 2006. It appears that Plaintiff wants Case No. 2:06-cv-324-FtM-99SPC to proceed in forma pauperis, although the Affidavit of Indigency was not complete (See Doc. #2). On April 26, 1996, the President signed into law the Prison Litigation Reform Act (hereinafter PLRA) which amended 28 U.S.C. § 1915 by adding the following subsection: (g) In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgement in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incaracerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it was frivilous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent damnger of serious physical injury. Section 1915(g), known as the “three strikes provision,” requires this Court to consider prisoner actions dismissed before, as well as after, the enactment of the PLRA. Rivera v. Allin, 144 F.3d 719.730 (11th Cir.) cert. dismissed, 524 U.S. 978 (1998). The Court takes judicial notice of filings brought by Plaintiff in a Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-00324-UA-SPC Document 5 Filed 07/06/2006 Page 2 of 2 Court of the United States that were dismissed on the grounds that they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted: (1) 2:06-cv-308; (2) 3:04-cv-31; (3) 3:03-cv-297; (4) 1:01-cv-324; (5)1:01-cv-666; (6)1:02-cv-23077. Because Plaintiff has had three or more prior dismissals and is not under imminent danger of serious physical injury, his application to proceed in informa pauperis will be denied and this action will be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may initiate a new civil rights action by filing a new civil rights complaint form and paying the full $350.00 filing fee. ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. is DENIED. 2. 3. This case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall: (1) enter judgement dismissing Plaintiff’s Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2) this case without prejudice; (2) terminate any pending motions; and (3) close this file. DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida, on this of July, 2006. 6th day SA: alj Copies: All Parties of Record -2-
flag this doc
25
0
not rated
0
4/14/2008
English
Preview

Coleman v. Vasquez - 5

justia 4/14/2008 | 22 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Coleman v. Otwell et al - 2

justia 4/14/2008 | 24 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Coleman v. Stus et al - 5

justia 4/14/2008 | 26 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Coleman v. Allen (INMATE2) - 3

justia 4/15/2008 | 20 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Coleman v. Pearson - 2

justia 4/14/2008 | 32 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Coleman v. Bergh - 3

justia 4/15/2008 | 29 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Coleman v. Campbell et al (INMATE1) - 3

justia 4/14/2008 | 28 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Potts v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP - 5

justia 4/14/2008 | 38 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Coleman v. USA - 4

justia 4/14/2008 | 20 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Coleman v. Hardy - 7

justia 4/15/2008 | 21 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Coleman v. Branch Banking and Trust Company et al - 3

justia 4/14/2008 | 111 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

COLEMAN-ADEBAYO v. LEAVITT - 39

justia 4/14/2008 | 14 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

COLEMAN-ADEBAYO v. LEAVITT - 38

justia 4/14/2008 | 15 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Coleman v. United States Of America - 3

justia 4/14/2008 | 19 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Coleman v. Stus et al - 4

justia 4/14/2008 | 19 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 81

justia 4/16/2008 | 501 | 4 | 0 | legal
Preview

Taylor et al v. Acxiom Corporation et al - 62

justia 4/16/2008 | 377 | 4 | 0 | legal
Preview

Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al v. RDR Books et al - 73

justia 4/16/2008 | 380 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Stiener et al v. Apple, Inc. et al - 73

justia 4/16/2008 | 584 | 3 | 0 | legal
Preview

Trujillo v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al - 86

justia 4/16/2008 | 657 | 4 | 0 | legal
Preview

Ticketmaster LLC v. RMG Technologies Inc et al - 105

justia 4/16/2008 | 354 | 1 | 0 | legal
Preview

EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al - 51

justia 4/16/2008 | 411 | 1 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 78

justia 4/16/2008 | 346 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 79

justia 4/16/2008 | 375 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 75

justia 4/16/2008 | 437 | 0 | 0 | legal
 
review this doc