Acrobat PDF

(PC) Mario Padilla v. Mendoza-Powers et al - 5

You must be logged in to download this document
Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
33
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/14/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
(PC) Mario Padilla v. Mendoza-Powers et al Doc. 5 Case 1:06-cv-00734-LJO-DLB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 MARIO PADILLA, Document 5 Filed 06/15/2006 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA K. MENDOZA-POWERS, Warden, et al., 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 pauperis. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:06-CV-00734-OWW-DLB-P ORDER TO SUBMIT NEW APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND CERTIFIED COPY OF TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT OR PAY FILING FEE Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis did not include the required original signature by an authorized officer of the institution of incarceration. Additionally, plaintiff has not filed a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit a new application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his trust account statement, or to pay the $350.00 filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk’s Office shall send to plaintiff the form for application to proceed in forma 2. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his prison trust account Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:06-cv-00734-LJO-DLB 1 2 3 4 5 3c0hj8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Document 5 Filed 06/15/2006 Page 2 of 2 statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, or in the alternative, to pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 15, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
(PC) Hernandez v. Mendoza-Powers - 3
Views: 23  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Tunstall v. Mendoza-Powers et al - 5
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Tunstall v. Mendoza-Powers et al - 5
Views: 15  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Epps v. Mendoza-Powers, et al. - 15
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Weiswasser v. Mendoza-Powers et al - 7
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Epps v. Mendoza-Powers, et al. - 15
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Epps v. Mendoza-Powers, et al. - 12
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Joshua v. Mendoza-Powers et al - 6
Views: 21  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Spencer v. Mendoza-Powers et al - 3
Views: 15  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Epps v. Mendoza-Powers, et al. - 13
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
(WMW) Collins v. Mendoza-Powers, et al. - 6
Views: 20  |  Downloads: 0
(PC)Bolamos v. Powers et al - 3
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Wooten v. Scribner et al - 15
Views: 15  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Anaya v. Campbell, et al - 5
Views: 19  |  Downloads: 0