Get documents about "Article Impact of Information Technology on Library
Description
Article Impact of Information Technology on Library document sample
Document Sample
Primary Level of
Instrument Type of Instrument Purpose Content Variables
Use
ACT Now! Case Classroom Survey/Questionaire
study instruments
Active Learning with Teachers Survey/Questionaire Survey measures
Technology: computer efficacy.
Computer Skills
Checklist
Administrator Administration Survey/Questionaire To determine the 32-likert type Demographics and
Survey Regarding extent to which questions, and 1 the following 14
Media and administrators open ended question variables: (a)
Technology agreed upon operating an opaque
Preparedness of specific skills that a projector, (b)
ADVANCED Teachers Survey/Questionaire This sample
Technology assessment tool
Competencies for was developed by
Educators Self- NC technology
Assessment Tool educators in
Analysis of student Students Observation Protocol To assess the a 5-level framework extent and types of
work for plaguerism amount of copying for evaluating plaguerism
in two english plaguerism
classes in Texas
and Alberta.
Arlington Public Classroom Observation Protocol To assess "what Observation Student behavioral
Schools (APS) extent is IMT [Office checklist of possible objectives, Level of
Instructional of Instructional technology uses, Technology
Technology Media & narrative space, 4- implementation
Integration Technology]providin point rating scale of
ASSET's Self Teachers Survey/Questionaire ASSET's Self
Assessment Tool Assessment Tool
can help members
evaluate their
technology
ATC - Attitudes Teachers Survey/Questionaire Survey measures
Toward Computers computer usage,
computer
appreciation, and
perceived societal
Attitude Toward Teachers Survey/Questionaire Survey measures
Computer Scale affective domain of
computer use.
Attitudes About Students Survey/Questionaire Measures the
Computers anxiety causing
attitudes of college-
age students
towards computers.
Attitudes toward Students Survey/Questionaire This measurement
Computer is designed for
Technologies administration to a
teaching population.
It measures self-
Attitudes Toward Teachers Survey/Questionaire Survey measures
Computers Scale general attitudes
toward computers.
Basic Skills Survey Classroom Survey/Questionaire Pre- and post-test 36 multiple choice basic technology
on basic skills in questions skills
technology.
BASIC Technology Teachers Survey/Questionaire This sample The Basic
Competencies for assessment tool Technology
Educators Self- was developed by Competencies for
Assessment Tool NC technology Educators Inventory
educators in (BTCEI) was
Bath County Students Survey/Questionaire Measures the
Computer Attitudes attitudes of 4th
Survey –12th students
towards computers.
BELCAT Blombert- Teachers Survey/Questionaire Survey measures
Erickson-Lowery attitudes toward
Computer Attitude learning about
Task computers and
towards computers
Beliefs about Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire Survey measures BATT (Beliefs About
Teaching with Service Only teachers’ context Teaching with
Technology (BATT) beliefs about using Technology)
Instrument technology in the instrument was
classroom including developed, tested
CAIN (Computer Teachers Survey/Questionaire Survey measures
Anxiety Index) avoidance of,
negative attitudes
toward, caution with,
and disinterest in
Challenge Classroom Observation Protocol
Classroom
Observation
Instrument
Chronicles of Teachers Survey/Questionaire To assist teachers Software package Student Reflection
Teaching in making that uses vignettes
connections and open ended
between their question modules.
situation and the
Classroom Classroom Observation Protocol To describe specific 21 indicators (19 on Observable
Observation (CO) classroom learning a 0-3 scale, 2 are classroom artifacts
Instrument environments. checklists of and practices
software and
technology)
Classroom Classroom Observation Protocol For administrators 17-item, 4-subscale Instructional Skills,
Observation by looking to do questionnaire Knowledge of
Littleton Academy formative classoom Content and Use of
(CO) observations Materials, Focus on
focusing on Students,
Classroom School District Observation Protocol To collect data in Primarily narrative, Describe Lesson,
Observation by Sun evaluating school 1 3-response student grouping,
Associates (MA) districts' technology question technology in use,
programs. computers in
classroom, teaching
Classroom Classroom Observation Protocol
Observation
Measure
Classroom Classroom Observation Protocol To aid in the Observaion Instructional
Observation Protocol evaluation of Project protocol: 35-items emphasis, modes of
Inquiry, an NSF instruction,
on 4-point scale with
initiative to improve room to record questions, teacher
math and science evidence behaviors, materials
Classroom Classroom Observation Protocol To assess the Timed intervals and type of instruction,
Observation quality and likely 5-point scales, student
Protocol (COP) impact of the lesson. capsule description engagement,
cognitive activity,
and key indicators
Classroom Classroom Observation Protocol To assist in Narratives with Lesson purpose,
Observation observing science reflection on instructional
Protocol (COP) teaching. standards and materials, science
guidelines Capsules content,
of narratives on implementation,
Classroom Classroom Observation Protocol The project "was Checklist portion 6 components of
Observation designed to provide had 6 items constructivist
Protocol in Applying descriptive models assessed on the teaching
Technology to of constructivist following 5-point
Restructuring and learning scale. Not evident 2.
CODE 77 Self- Teachers Survey/Questionaire Self evaluation of
Evaluation Rubrics computer usage and
for Advanced efficacy.
Teacher Computer
Use
CODE 77 Self- Teachers Survey/Questionaire Self evaluation of
Evaluation Rubrics computer usage and
for Basic Teacher efficacy.
Computer Use
CODE 77 Self- Teachers Survey/Questionaire Self evaluation of
Evaluation Rubrics internet usage and
for Teacher Internet efficacy.
Use
Computer Anxiety Students Survey/Questionaire Measures the
Questionnaire anxiety causing
attitudes of college-
age students
towards computers.
Computer Anxiety Teachers Survey/Questionaire Teacher survey
Rating Scale (CARS) measures technical
capability, appeal of
learning and using
computers, being
Computer Anxiety Teachers Survey/Questionaire Measures anxiety
Scale (COMPAS) related with
computer use.
Computer Attitude Teachers Survey/Questionaire Teacher survey
Items measures computer
relevance, computer
enjoyment.
Computer Attitude Teachers Survey/Questionaire Semantic differential
Measure (CAM) scale of users'
anticipated degree
of comfort, pleasure
and satisfaction in
Computer Attitude Teachers Survey/Questionaire Teacher survey
Questionnaire (CAQ) measures computer
importance,
computer
enjoyment,
Computer Attitude Teachers Survey/Questionaire Teacher survey
Scale measures
confidence, liking,
anxiety, and
usefulness of
Computer Attitudes Students Survey/Questionaire Measures the
and Self-Confidence attitudes and self
Questionnaire confidence of 7th
–12th students
towards computers.
Computer Aversion Students Survey/Questionaire
Scale
Computer Literacy: Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire Teacher survey
Definition and Service Only measures computer
Survey Items for literacy from the
Assessment in superintendent to
Schools - ETS# the students.
Computer Self- Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire Teacher survey
Efficacy Scale - Service Only measures computer
ETS# TC018510 efficacy specifically
perceptions of
individual
Computer Use Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire Teacher survey
Questionnaire - Service Only measures computer
ETS# TC018329 literacy.
Computers In Teachers Survey/Questionaire Teacher survey
Education Survey - measures computer
ETS# TC018351 literacy among
teachers, college
faculty, and student
Conceptual Analysis Teachers Observation Protocol To assess "a five-point likert- conceptual
of Observation preservice teachers type scale ranging understanding
ability to use from a low score of
conceptual one (no reference to
knowledge in specific learning
Concerns-based Teachers Survey/Questionaire It is targeted toward
Adoption Model- describing
Levels of Use behaviors of
(CBAM-LoU) innovation users
through various
Students Survey/Questionaire
Confidence and Desired Knowledge with Computer Technologies
Constructing Mental Teachers Observation Protocol To examine the Stimulated recall via Participants' Mental
Model Paradigms "mental models" videotape of models of:
for Teaching used by media teaching-learning electronic data
Electronic specialists. episode. Combined base, the role of the
Resources with pre- and post- library media
CTAP², Proficiency Teachers Survey/Questionaire Measures computer The Proficiency
Assessment efficacy. Assessment is an
on-line, self-
assessment tool
that allows
CTAP², Survey – Teachers Survey/Questionaire Measures computer The Technology
Technology Use use. Use Survey is an on-
Survey line tool that allows
site, district, county
and state
Department of Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire To determine the First 23 questions technology use
Curriculum and Service Only level of experience on the Administrator
Instruction in technology that Survey Regarding
Technology Survey was required of Media and
elementary Technology
Diagnostic Tests for Students Survey/Questionaire Measures computer
Computer Literacy literacy among
students, focusing
on strengths and
weaknesses.
DIAL Class Teachers Interview Protocol To determine the 8 interview questions Students, student
Observation Protocol knowledge and learning, unit and
skills a participant lesson develoment
has acquired and
how they were used
Dialogical Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire To enhance communication Preservice student
Community Service Only communication in space for preservice thoughts
Exercise (DCE) an introductory level education course
education course.
Differentiated Classroom Observation Protocol For observing Informal pre- Activities, student
Classroom classroom activities observation engagement,
Observation Scale with an eye towards interview, Codes for cognitive activity,
(DCOS) differentiated scoring 5-minute locus of learning
teaching styles. segments of time
EAST Classroom Classroom Observation Protocol To collect data for Observation rubric Self-Directed
Observation Tool California’s EETT based on indicators leaning, Problem-
program, a grant for the various solving strategies,
program for grades subscales Collaboration and
4-8 to assist eligible Teamwork,
Eiffel project teacher Teachers Survey/Questionaire
questionnaire.
Electronic Portfolio Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire Measures whether
Tools Survey Service Only faculty and students
are creating
electronic portfolios.
E-Mail Teachers Survey/Questionaire Survey measures
attitudes toward
classroom use of E-
mail.
e-mail survey Teachers Survey/Questionaire To assess if P.E. some likert-type interaction with
teachers using a response, some other individuals,
listerserv influenced open ended feelings of support
their: teaching questions. Followed and engagement,
practices and up some interview immediate access
Engaged Learning Teachers Survey/Questionaire To help teachers do Engaged Learning
Profile Tool a self-assessment (vision of learning,
of the learning tasks, assessment,
environment they instructional model,
create and provide a learning context,
enGauge® Online Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire This profile is http://www.ncrel.org/
Assessment Service Only intended to capture engauge/assess/edu
not only specific samp.htm
technology skills,
but also educator
ePlan Teachers Survey/Questionaire When you finish, online self- NCATE Standards
you receive your assessment and ISTE Standards
own Individual
Learning Plan (ILP)
based on your input.
Evaluation of Pre- Teachers - Pre-
Service Teachers' Service Only
Technology Skills
Extended Rubrics Classroom Observation Protocol To provide more Rubric of cooperative
explicit data instructional learning, student
regarding the quality strategies discussion, project-
of targeted based learning,
classroom practices. higher-level
Flashlight Current Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire To identify the a preservice student technology applied
Student Inventory Service Only technology they survey by preservice
used [by preservice teachers
teachers] to
complete leaming
Funds of Knowledge Teachers Survey/Questionaire To collect
Questionnaire information from
participating
teachers regarding
(1) the percieved
Gender-Based Teachers - Female Evaluation Matrix To select websites 8 evaluation criteria social connectivity,
Website Evaluation Only of high interests to flexibility and
Model females. motility,
contextuality,
personal
Global Connections Teachers Survey/Questionaire
Technology Survey.
Global Connections
Idaho Technology Teachers Survey/Questionaire Measures two levels The Assessment
Performance of competency for consists of six
Assessment teachers and computer-based
administrators: tasks designed to
computer use and take from 20 to 45
ILC Project Teachers Interview Protocol To determine the 12-question Level of Use,
Participant Interview knowledge and Interview with rubric barriers to use,
skills a participant for identifying levels highlights of use,
has acquired and of use affect of technology
how they were used on the students
Indicators of Teachers Observation Protocol To compare unit 37-item checklist "active student
instructional change plans developed by (leveled engagement,
instrument the K-12 teachers implementation) on increase in
submitted prior to a 4-point likert scale instructional
the institute with with notation for technologies, and
Information Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire Measures
Technology in Service Only information
Teacher Education technology in
teacher education.
Instructional Design Teachers Survey/Questionaire Self-analysis tool for Open ended writing "possibilities,
Possibilities, teachers prompts on the realities, issues,
Realities, Issues, considering intemet possibilities in theirstandards, and
Standards, Multi- innovation in the environment, then multidimensional
Dimensional views classroom via the asks for reflections perspectives."
instructor survey Teachers Survey/Questionaire A perceptual survey Likert-type, "(a) the ways in
that assesses the checklists, open which specific
perceptions of ended response revisions have
course instructors of impacted the course
a teacher education and their facilitation
Interview Protocol Teachers Interview Protocol To interview groups A series of focus Sample questions:
of teachers about group questions * What types of
technology technologies are
implementation and available for you to
integration. use at your student
Interview protocol Teachers Interview Protocol To assess and track 34-item, 3-step Part 1: teaching
for Applying a teacher's process for practice and
Technology to pedagogy with an interviewing teachers perceptions of
Restructuring and eye towards students. Part 2:
Learning study constructivist teaching history and
Kentucky Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire This survey is
Implementation of Service Only designed to assist
Technology Survey existing teachers
and administrators
in meeting the
Learning with Teachers Survey/Questionaire This profile tool will 47 self-report itemsvision of learning,
Technology Profile help you to compare on a 4-point scale tasks, assessment,
Tool (LTPT) your current instructional model,
instructional learning context,
practices with a set grouping, teacher
Literacy, Adapting, Teachers Survey/Questionaire Rubric of levels of technology use,
and Transforming technology use teaching and
Uses of Technology learning, staff
development-
technical support,
Local Systemic Classroom Observation Protocol Same as COP but Narratives with Lesson purpose,
Change Classroom applicable to all reflection on instructional
Observation disciplines. standards and materials, content,
Protocol, 2002-2003 guidelines Capsules implementation,
of narratives on classroom culture
LOFTI ISTE Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire Measures teachers
Teacher Profile Service Only best practices,
teaching
philosophies and
uses of technologies.
LoTiQ Level of Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire The intent of the Levels of
Technology Service Only LoTiQ survey Technology
Implementation instrument is to Implementation
Questionnaire provide (LoTi) was
stakeholders with developed in a effort
Mankato Survey of Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire Measures
Technology Use, Service Only technology use,
Ability and ability and
Accessibility accessibility.
Matching Person Classroom Observation Protocol Matching Person The five SOTU- present
and Technology and Technology assessment experiences,
(MPT) (MPT) is designed instruments are the feelings (self-
to be a series of Survey of esteem and well-
assessment Technology Use being) about
Math, Science and Students Evaluation Matrix Provide a Observation-based Student use,
Technology (MST) framework for performance understanding, and
evaluation system authentic profiles, student creation of
assessment of New portfolio, follow up knowledge about
York’s alternative assessment mathematics,
Mathematics Teachers Survey/Questionaire Assessing the "90 questions, some demographics,
education survey technology self- of whichcontained importance of
efficacy and use multiple technology, comfort
among math components." level with
teachers. Mostly likert-type, technology,
Microcomputer Students Survey/Questionaire Measures self-
Beliefs Inventory efficacy and
(MBI) outcome
expectancy beliefs
of middle school
Microcomputer Students Survey/Questionaire
Playfulness Scale.
Microcomputer Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire Survey measures
Utilization in Service Only beliefs about
Teaching Efficacy computer use
Belief Instrument. - among teachers.
ETS# TC019038
NETS Teachers Survey/Questionaire National
Educational
Technology
Standards (NETS)
questionnaires were
Observation Teachers Observation Protocol Preparing 37-item, 5 subscale Teaching activities,
Instrument professional observation protocol teaching
development and presentation, class
assessing pre- management, lab
service technology management,
Observations with Teachers Observation Protocol To identify which pre-observation teacher attention,
pre- and post- motivational interview protocol, relavence,
interview instruments strategies are directions to confidence,
regularly used by observers, post- satisfaction;
LMSs [library media observation observations
Online Questionnaire Teachers Survey/Questionaire To assess the 1 likert-type the affect of
experience of question, 1 open Gateway on internet
teachers with little response all online navigating
computer
experience
Online Survey Teachers Survey/Questionaire To assess persons 9 multiple choice the affect of
using the Gateway questions 2 open Gateway on internet
site. ended questions, all navigating
online
open-ended survey Teachers Interview Protocol Examined the 4 open-ended The 4 questions
of action research influence of using questions were: 1. What is
electronic mail (e- going well?
mail) to support 2. What
novice teachers as concerns/challenges
PCC Assessment Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire Measures teacher The PCC
Tool Service Only status within the Assessment Tool
skill and knowledge has two
areas described in components: A
Professional general assessment
Perceived Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire Measures
Educational Service Only technology
Technology Needs integration and
Survey perceived needs by
teachers.
Planning Portfolios: Classroom Evaluation Matrix Rubric to evaluate a 3-point scale to Knowledge of:
Authentic library science class evaluate 3 standards learning styles and
Assessment for on using rubrics. of human growth
Library and development,
Professionals. teaching and
Post-treatment Students Survey/Questionaire To assess 17-likert type attitudes,
survey "perceptions and questions; 7 open perceptions, feelings
feelings" as well as response questions
preferences about
the treatment.
Pre- and post- Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire Preservice teachers 3-response likert- attitudes and
surveys for Service Only self-report current type questions, 2 perceptions towards
preservice teachers level of technology open ended technology in
in a technology knowledge and questions education, more
education course expectations for specifically:
Pre-service teacher Teachers - Pre- Focus Group
focus group protocol Service Only Protocol
Pre-service teacher Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire To measure the 55 2-part questions communication
survey Service Only knowledge and with likert-type technologies, social
skills efficacy of response sets teaming, inquiry-
teachers dealing (knowledge). 16 based learning,
with 55 technology more likert-type feedback and
Pre-service teacher Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire To understand their 5-point likert-type aspects of the
survey Service Only attitude towardsthe survey course curriculum
general use of
EDG's [electronic
discussion groups]
Pre-service Teachers - Pre- Observation Protocol Purposeful Electronic space for "problem-solving
teachers' electronic Service Only collection of student the storage and and critical thinking
portfolios work that exhibits transmission of skills"
the student's efforts, preservice teacher
progress, and work
Pre-service Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire Designed to provide
Teachers' Service Only pre-service teachers
Technology Skills with general
information on their
technology
Profiler Basic Skills Students Survey/Questionaire
Assessment
PT3 baseline survey Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire Formal evaluation 52-item survey Frequency of:
instrument Service Only instrument used to developing online
assess the impact learning
of PT3 grant environments,
activities on teacher assessing
Public School Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire Measures how
Teachers Use of Service Only teachers use
Computers and the computers and the
Internet - Fast internet.
Response Survey
Qualitative Method Students Evaluation Matrix
Reflection sheet Teachers - Pre- Interview Protocol To assess the 4 questions dealing with: off
Service Only responses of 40 demanding an open- topic questions and
preservice teacher response reaction student behavior
who took part in a then reflection
multimedia teaching
Reformed Teaching Classroom Observation Protocol An observation 35-item checklist of Contextual
Observation instrument to constructivist background of site,
Protocol (RTOP) provide a practices, with Descriptions of
standardized means space for field notes Events, Subscales:
for detecting the Lesson Design and
SAMPI (Science Classroom Evaluation Matrix
and Math Program
Improvement)
Sample of teacher School District Focus Group To collect data in focus group student access and
focus group by Sun Protocol evaluating school structure with 22 use, teacher
Associates districts' technology questions fluency, teacher
programs. vision and strategy,
teacher access and
School Climate School District Survey/Questionaire School-based 49-item, 7-subscale Order, leadership,
Inventory (SCI) improvement survey instrument. environment,
planning in schools On a 5-point scale involvement,
and school districts instruction,
in several states, expectations,
School Observation School Observation Protocol To determine the "[A] summary of ten Instructional
Measure extent to which 15-minute orientation,
different common observations classroom
and alternative conducted in a organization,
instructional single day" 5-point instructional
School Technology School Evaluation Matrix
& Readiness
(STaR) Chart
ScreenCam Teachers Observation Protocol To observe the "a screen capture internet navigation
effectiveness of an program"
internet navigation
tool, Gateway, in
aiding teachers with
Self-Efficacy Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire Measures self-
Teaching and Service Only efficacy and
Knowledge knowledge of
Instrument for technology use.
Teachers using
Self-Esteem Index Students Survey/Questionaire To measure self- Aspects of students’
esteem. self-esteem
Sheltered Teachers Observation Protocol To provide concrete 30-item, 8-category Preparation,
Instruction examples of the checklist Building
Observation features of sheltered Background,
Protocol (SIOP) instruction that can Comprehensible
enhance and Input, Strategies,
Stages of Adoption School Evaluation Matrix
of Technology.
Stages of Concern Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire
Questionnaire Service Only
Start Me Up! Game Students Focus Group To assess children's "…[Each] cards "What would you
Protocol interest and were double-sided; like to know more
preferences in the front required about?" "Ask your
reading. the child to fill in librarian where to
such personal start; by the way,
STEP Faculty Classroom Observation Protocol To observe and 38 observation instructional
Observation (SFO) assess instruction of questions (13 of practices, learning
participating faculty them have closed environments,
(single class response sets) project evaluation,
meeting) and pre- teacher/student
Student articles with Students Evaluation Matrix Analyzing the steps 4-point rubric task analysis,
scoring rubric needed to complete evaluating the 4 location and access,
the article, locating variables. use of information,
and obtaining synthesis
appropriate
Student Attitudes Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire To assess "a five point Likert- perceptions/attitudes
scale Service Only preservice teachers' type scale ranging
perceptions. from a low of one"
Student focus Students Focus Group Students were 50- or 60-minute student ideas,
groups Protocol asked to explain interview student actions
and expand on
comments made in
class, verify
Student interview Teachers - Pre- Interview Protocol To better Technological
questions Service Only understand an Support, Software
inquiry-based Evaluation, Science
science lesson at Content, Lesson
the level. Evaluation, Process
Student journal Students Evaluation Matrix To comprehend the Daily responses to cognitive responses,
entries scored interaction between open ended prompts affective responses
through coding students and the
school library media
specialist
Student logs and Students Evaluation Matrix To discern patterns Decision Point!
responses among the students, (DP), the
insight into their intervention used to
experiences and teach the civil rights
feelings, and movement, time
Student survey Students Survey/Questionaire To collect 45 likert-type skills, instructional
perceptual data questions proficiency, value of
from students in the technology,
teacher education classroom
course. integration
Student Survey Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire To evaluate Same as Same as
Regarding Media Service Only beginning teachers Administrator Administrator
and Technology preparedness and Survey Regarding Survey Regarding
Preparedness expectation to use Media and Media and
each [technology] Technology Technology
Student teacher Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire Focused on Open ended perception of the
survey Service Only gathering preservice question(s) electronic portfolio
teachers'
perceptions of
electronic portfolio
Student Technology Students Survey/Questionaire To assess the Time spent using
Use Survey penetration of computer, subscale
technology in to the on student self-
life of the student. efficacy in dealing
with technology
Survey adapted Teachers Survey/Questionaire To examine the questionnaire [with use of technology,
from Technology theory that 7-point likert scale] perceived
Acceptance Model perceived was designed to usefulness, and
(TAM) usefulness and include five items of perceived ease of
perceived ease of perceived use
Survey for Teachers - College Survey/Questionaire This survey is Online survey with a technology budget,
Technology and the Faculty designed to gather mix of yes/no and 4- technology support,
Preservice Teacher some information point likert-type technology skills
Education Program about the role of response sets. For required,
technology in your higher ed. Leaders hard/software
Survey of Computer Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire Pre- and post-test 47 multiple choice frequency and use
Technology Uses Service Only on >the range and questions of various
frequency of technologies
technology uses.
Survey of Computer Students Survey/Questionaire Capture exclusively Checklist of the computer capacity
Use (SCU) student access to, subscales, and a and currency,
ability, and use of rubric configuration,
computers rather student computer
than teacher use of ability, and student
Survey of Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire
Instructional Service Only
Practices and Beliefs
Survey of internet Technology Survey/Questionaire To examine the role likert-type questions leadership role of
and computer Specialists of the ICT internet and
coordinators coordinators in the computer
planning and technology
implementation coordinators (as
Survey of Librarian Librarians Survey/Questionaire How do library 20-question paper- training, Internet
Internet Use professionals and and-pencil survey. use, and technical
staff use the 5-item likert-type information
Internet? questions.
Survey of Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire 7 open ended
Preservice Service Only questions
Teachers on
Technology
Readiness.
Survey of preservice Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire To further survey of preservice "how roles in their
teachers who acted Service Only understand the teachers groups were
as website process and established, how
developers perception of decisions were
preservice teachers made, what was
Survey of School Survey/Questionaire Assess building- 13 open-ended Technology
Technology wide technology questions with Infrastrucure
Infrastructure (STI) infrastructure. attached rubrics to
score responses. To
be completed by the
Survey on online Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire Pre- and post-forms Pre: 1 yes/no previous use,
discussion group Service Only of the survey assess question, likert-type feelings toward,
students with room for open inhibitors or
knowledges, response, accelerators of use
attitudes, and of online discussion
Survey: Teacher Teachers Survey/Questionaire This inventory
Inventory measures the level
of use of
technology, as well
as the teacher's self-
Surveys on Students Survey/Questionaire To assess whether One true/false strategies to combat
"information or not 4th and 8th question, one information
overload" grade students in ranking question, overload, definition
Texas feel there is one short answer, of information,
too much one definition feelings when
T. L. T. Challenge. Teachers Survey/Questionaire
Follow-up teacher
questionnaire:
Elementary and
middle schools.
T. L. T. Challenge. Parents Survey/Questionaire
Parent/Guardian
follow-up
questionnaire.
Taking a Good Look Teachers Observation Protocol
at Instructional
Technology
(TAGLIT)
Teacher Baseline Teachers Survey/Questionaire
Questionnaire
Teacher Belief and Teachers Survey/Questionaire To identify a 11 open-ended Pedagogical Beliefs
Practices (TRI) teacher’s beliefs questions with 11 and Classroom
and intentions rubrics to score Practices
regarding the use of each response from
technology in 0-3
Teacher Teachers Survey/Questionaire To assess survey using 5-point
Competencies pedagogical Likert scale
Knowledge Rating knowledge about
Scales technology.
Teacher Follow-up Teachers Survey/Questionaire
Questionnaire
Teacher Online Teachers Survey/Questionaire Measures the
Survey of effectiveness of
Technology Use instructional
technology and its
implementation
Teacher Report of Classroom Observation Protocol To validate the Observable
Classroom researcher-based classroom artifacts
Observation Classroom and practices
Observation.
Teacher Self-Rating Teachers Survey/Questionaire
of Technology Skills
and Use of
Technology in the
Curriculum
Teacher Technology Teachers Survey/Questionaire Designed to provide
Competency an individual
teacher with a
review of their
strengths and
Teacher Technology Teachers Survey/Questionaire Focuses on teacher 20 items, 5-point technology usage,
Questionnaire experiences during Liker-type response professional
the current school set development,
year. accessibility of
technology
Teacher Technology Teachers Evaluation Matrix Explain through 16-item rubric with 4- technology use,
Standard examples the 16 point scale and knowledge of
Continuum (TTSC) technology room for recording technology,
standards for evidence knowledge of using
teachers. technology in the
Teacher Technology Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire
Survey (Pre-Service Service Only
Teachers)
Teacher Technology Teachers Survey/Questionaire
Survey ACT Now!
Teacher Technology Teachers Survey/Questionaire To assess time 91 questions in 4 How many times a
Use Survey (TTUS) spent on using subscales, one teacher does a
technology in the open-ended question technology-related
classroom. tasks a week, How
many hours a week
Teachers & Teachers Survey/Questionaire Survey provides a A multidimensional
Technology: A Snap- snapshot of how instrument that
Shot Survey prevalent measures
technology is in stakeholder
education today, attitudes,
Teachers' Attitudes Teachers Survey/Questionaire Teacher attitudes - A 99-199 item
Toward Computers Measures computer Likert/Semantic
Questionnaire (TAC) use self perceptions. Differential
Instrument for
measuring teachers'
Teachers' Attitudes Teachers Survey/Questionaire Survey measures The Teachers'
Towards Information teacher attitudes Attitudes Toward
Technology (TAT) specifically Information
regarding Technology (TAT)
information complements
Teachers' Views of Teachers Survey/Questionaire
Technology and
Teaching
Teaching, Learning, Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire Assessed what constructivist
& Computing Service Only teachers they practice, use of
Teacher survey believed about technology
teaching and
learning.
Technology Ability Teachers Survey/Questionaire To assess 46-item, 4-subscale Subscales: Social
Self-Report confidence and web-based survey and Ethical,
Instrument (TAPSI) ability in using Teacher Strategy,
technology. High Tech Skill
Level, and Basic
Technology Administration Survey/Questionaire
coordinator
questionnaire and
principal/director
questionnaire
Technology exam Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire To reflect skills and performanced- knowledge of:
Service Only procedures of the based measure (at operating systems,
projects assigned in a computer) with online resources,
the [preservice some open- word processing,
teachers' response questions database,
Technology for School District Evaluation Matrix To analyze data a 4 criterion matrix (a) presentation of
teaching and from district plans in theory, (b) modeling
learning: strategies relation to district or demonstration,
for staff support of staff (c) practice with low-
development and development. risk feedback, and
Technology in the Classroom Observation Protocol An aid for principals 4-point scale productivity,
Classroom Teacher entirely focused on multimedia and
Rubric (TIC) technology. communication,
research and
problem solving,
Technology Map Teachers - In- Survey/Questionaire Measures teacher
Survey Service Only use of technology at
home and at school.
This tool can also
be used to survey
Technology Classroom Observation Protocol To document the pre-observation class organization,
Observation integration of sheet (for teacher), cognitive activity,
Instrument technology into info about class and classroom
classroom teaching. students, interaction, student
observation sheet role, student
Technology Teachers Survey/Questionaire Self-Assessment of
Proficiency Self- teacher of
Assessment technology efficacy.
Technology Self- Teachers Survey/Questionaire Determine own level
Assessment Tool of technology
(TSAT) proficiency and to
identify personal
technology
Technology Skills Students Survey/Questionaire To assess the 57-item survey (51 Computer Basics,
Assessment (TSA) perceived Likert-Type, 6 Software Basics,
technological multiple choice) Multimedia Basics,
abilities of the Internet Basics,
participants, while Advanced Skills,
Technology Skills Teachers Survey/Questionaire For teachers to
Self-Assessment identify their
strengths and
weaknesses as it
pertains to
Technology Use Students Survey/Questionaire Technology Use
Questionnaire Questionnaire
(TUQ) (TUQ) is a self-
assessment of a
teacher's
Technology Use: Teachers Observation Protocol This tool is designed Learning
narrative of setting
Observation Tool for use by site of the lesson, environment,
administrators, checklists student technology
mentor teachers, use, lesson
peer coaches, or implementation,
Technology- Teachers Observation Protocol To describe 3- and 5-point rating appropriateness of
Enhanced Lesson technology use. scales. technology use,
Assessment Rubric Electronically student readiness
(TELAR) available in for tech use, student
FileMaker Pro proficiency with the
Technology- Classroom Observation Protocol To enable Observation Lesson objectives,
Supported Lesson administrators to template with a Introduction,
Observation document actual mixture of narrative Instruction, Guided
events and have and checklist Activity,
more validity than (observed/not Independent
Texas STaR Chart Classroom Observation Protocol The Texas STaR Self-adminstered in teaching and
Chart is designed to learning, educator
help campuses and preparation and
districts determine development,
their progress administration and
The CEO Forum Schools Survey/Questionaire
Institutional Self-
Assessment
Students
The Computer Attitude Scale Survey/Questionaire
The Computer Teachers Survey/Questionaire Teacher survey
Survey Scale measures efficacy
and anxiety.
The Effects of Students Evaluation Matrix To establish the Information Theory length of search for
Concept Mapping usefulness of analysis to generate information, type of
on the Searching information theory in quantitative search for
Behavior of Tenth- the study of the comparison among information,
Grade Students. search process and the qualitative data. methods for finding
The Teacher Teachers Survey/Questionaire
Questionnaire
(A.C.T. Now!
Project).
ThinkQuest PT3 Teachers - Pre- Survey/Questionaire
Catalyst Grant - Service Only
Exiting Preservice
Teacher
Questionnaire
T-Lesson Scoring Classroom Observation Protocol
Criteria
Utah Technology Teachers Survey/Questionaire To assess an Online self- Basic concepts,
Awareness Project individuals administered productivity,
Rubrics (UTAP) familiarity and use questionnaire that communication/infor
of technology in uses a 4-point scale mation, classroom
their current job instruction,
Vermont Classroom Classroom Observation Protocol To provide data on Pre-observation Planning and
Observation Tool which decisions for interview, SAMPI- organization of the
(VCOT) program like classroom tool, implementation
improvement can be interview, post- of the lesson,
based. observation interview content of a lesson,
Video Analysis Teachers Observation Protocol To support teachers computer program student teacher
Support Tool in developing an with structured understanding of
(VAST), ability to notice and videos of teaching "classroom
interpret aspects of examples interaction-student
classroom practice thinking, teacher's
Video Observation Teachers - Pre- Observation Protocol To assess the The Video Pre-service
Test Service Only participants' ability Observation Test teachers'
to identify, interpret, consists of understanding of
or analyze elements computer displayed teaching-learning
of effective teaching video clips with concepts
Vignette Analysis Teachers Observation Protocol To provide an 100 point scale conceptual
indication of student based on scoring of understanding of
performance on 25 learning theory
application of
learning theory prior
Web-based student Students Evaluation Matrix Assess preservice 3 statements of educational
portfolios teacher learning. philosophy philosophy
Web-based student Students Evaluation Matrix
profile
WebCT Teachers Evaluation Matrix Provides archives of electronic software to provide students
transcripts of used in a preservice with information, to
chatroom education course create dialogue to
discussions, bulletin assess retention of
board postings and this information, to
Website Usability Teachers Survey/Questionaire To evaluate usability Some likert-type Evaluating materials
Questionnaire of online project response, possibly on: ease of use,
resources. open ended useful to instruction,
question(s) supportive of
teaching and
Classroom Evaluation Matrix
Classroom Evaluation Matrix
Classroom Evaluation Matrix
Parents Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Students Evaluation Matrix
Teachers Evaluation Matrix SRI's evaluation of
the project included,
among many data
sources, annual
surveys of project
Teachers Evaluation Matrix
Teachers - Pre- Evaluation Matrix
Service Only
Teachers - Pre- Evaluation Matrix
Service Only
Teachers - Pre- Evaluation Matrix
Service Only
Teachers - Pre- Evaluation Matrix
Service Only
Notes and
Psychometrics Used in
Relevant Websites
Lynch, E. W., M.
Bober, et al. (1998).
Southwest http://insight.southce
Educational ntralrtec.org/ilib/tss.h
Development tml
Laboratory
Albee, J.J. A Study Revised Bedell's
of Preservice (1994) 19-item
Elementary survey
Teachers'
Technology Skill
NC Technology http://www.ncpublics
Competencies for chools.org/tap/asses
Educators s.htm#ADVANCED
McGregor, Joy H.
(1998). Do Scribes
Learn?: Copying
and Information
Use. School Library
Instrument available Uses CEO's STaR
at: as the basis of the
http://www.arlington. framework.
k12.va.us/instruct/IM
T/downloads/tech_o
http://asset.asu.iass Could not access
essment.org/ia/rende instrument
r.userLayoutRootNo
de.uP (log in as
guest). Also
Raub, (1981)
Francis, (1993)
Raub, Annalyse,
Callahan (1981)
Kinzie, M. B., &
Delcourt, M.A.B.
(1992).
Reece & Gable,
(1982)
Rosaen, C.L., et. Based on Profiler
al., Making Expert List for Basic
Connections: Skills (PT3)
Collaborative
Approaches to
Concurrent validity Flowers, C.P. & http://www.ncpublics
was established Algozzine, R.F. chools.org/tap/asses
using a correlation (2000). s.htm#ADVANCED
coefficient between
performance based
Bear, George
Others (1987).
Erickson, (1987)
Lumpe, A.T. & http://www.iste.org/jrt
Chambers, E. e/34/1/abstracts/lum
(2001). pe.cfm
Maurer, (1983);
Jerabek, J.A.,
Meyera, L.S. &
Kordinakb, S.T.
(2001); Maurer &
From SRI
Nelson. W. A. & More for teaching
Smith, R. E. (1994). classroom
Learning how to behaviors than
teach: a computer assessing
based system to classroom behaviors
Cronbach’s alpha Phye, G. D. (2000). A matrix score can
was .88 Engaging be obtained by
Technology & combining the
Learning Teacher Technology
Opportunities: Use Survey,
http://www.cde.state. Simplified Horizon
co.us/cdechart/guide proticol. In
book/adm/pdf/LACla Appalachian
ssroomObservationT Technology in
eacher.pdf Education
http://www.sun- In Appalachian
associates.com/eval/ Technology in
clsobsv.html Education
Consortium piece
"Classroom
Ross et al, 1991
http://www.ccsdscho
ols.com/administrati
on/assessment/APP
ENDIXC.pdf
Evaluation of
http://academics.sru. In Appalachian
edu/cmste/Evaluatio Technology in
n_observation.doc. Education
Instrument also at: Consortium piece
http://www.sci.tamuc "Classroom
http://www.horizon- In Appalachian
research.com/pdcon Technology in
vocation/20021001/a Education
bbreviated.pdf Consortium piece
"Classroom
Burns, M., In Appalachian
Menchaca M., & Technology in
Dimock, V. (n.d.). Education
Applying Consortium piece
Technology to "Classroom
Johnson, D. (1998) http://www.ed.gov/pu
bs/EdTechGuide/app
c-7.html
Johnson, D. (1998) http://www.ed.gov/pu
bs/EdTechGuide/app
c-6.html
Johnson, D. (1998) http://www.ed.gov/pu
bs/EdTechGuide/app
c-7.html
Toris, Carol (1984)
Heinssen, et al.,
(1987)
Oetting, (1983)
Pelgrum & Plomp,
(1993)
Kay, R. (1993)
Knezek & Miyashita,
(1993)
Gressard and Loyd,
(1986)
Levine, Tamar
Donitsa-Schmidt,
Smadar (1997).
Meier, S. T. (1988).
Lockheed, Marlaine
et al. (1983)
Murphy, Christine A
Others (1989)
Griswold, Philip A.
(1983).
Stevens, Dorothy Jo
(1980).
Knight, Stephanie Appendix B shows
L., Pedersen, actual scored
Susan, & Peters, responses
William (2004).
Connecting the
Hall & Rutherford,
(1974)
Murphy, Coover, &
Owen, 1989
Tallman, Julie I.
(1999). Constructing
Mental Model
Paradigms for
Teaching Electronic
California Standards http://ctap2w1.iasses
sment.org/ia/render.
userLayoutRootNode
.uP
California Standards http://ctap2w1.iasses
sment.org/ia/render.
userLayoutRootNode
.uP
Albee, J.J. A Study Adapted from
of Preservice Administrator
Elementary Survey Regarding
Teachers' Media and
Technology Skill Technology
Pyrczak, Fred (1988)
http://www.iaete.org/ Designed for use
challenge/upload/DI with Horizon
AL_Class_Obs_Prot Research Inc.
ocol.pdf. AEL study classroom protocol
info at:
Harrington, H.L. "made possible with
Using Computer Confer II, a
Conferencing to computer
Foster and Assess conferencing
Prospective system"
http://www.bsu.edu/ Information is also
web/jccassady/resea in the Roeper
rch/Differentiated%2 Review
0Classroom%20Obs
ervation%20Scale%
http://rtecexchange.e Aligned with CEO's
dgateway.net/cs/rtec STaR format as well
p/download/rtec_files as the California
/78/EAST_obs_6- Technology
8_form_rev_8_03b.p Standards for 6th,
Denes, V. (1999).
http://survey.rockma
n.com/iste2/eportfoli
o.htm
D'Souza, (1992)
Pennington, T., et. questions were
al., Exploring the derived from six
Influence of a separate sources:
Physical Education (a) pre-pilot
Listserv on K-12 interviews... (b)
Eib, B J. Beyond the Same as Learning
Bells and Whistles: with Technology
Evaluating Profile Tool (LTPT)
Technology Use in
the Classroom.
NCREL http://www.ncrel.org/
engauge/assess/ass
ess.htm
http://www.my- Generates a list of
ecoach.com/plannin professional
g/sample_ilp.html. activities the teacher
Also appeared in should complete to
NCES (2002). improve their
http://www.necatalyst
.org/AssessmentOnl
y.pdf
http://www.people.m Extension of the
emphis.edu/~coe_cr School Observation
ep/instruments/index Measure (SOM)
.html
"Good practice Howland, Jane &
scales" had Wedman, Julie
cronbach's alphas (2004). A Process
over .70 Model for Faculty
Development:
Dimock, K. V., et al.
(2000). Applying
Techonolgy to
Restructuring and
Learning: How
Agosto, Denise E.
(2002). Propelling
Young Women into
the Cyber Age:
Gender
Bielefeldt (2000)
Educational http://www.uidaho.ed
Technology u/ed/EDTECH/itpa/
Assessment Office,
(2000)
http://www.iaete.org/
challenge/upload/DI
AL_Part._Interview.p
df. AEL study info
at:
Mitchem, Katherine, In Appendix A
Wells, Deborah L.,
Wells, John G.
(2003). Effective
Integration of
Moursund & http://www.mff.org/p
Beilefeldt, (2001) ubs/ME154.pdf
Kozlaka, Tiffany A., Uses the levels:
Grabowski, Barbara Inquiry, Recipes,
L., McCarthy, Strategic
Marianne (2003). Sequencing,
Reflection Through Contextualizing,
Bober, Marcie
(2004). Journal of
Technology and
Teacher Education
(2004) 12(2), 159-
Bullock, David Questions were
(2004). Moving derived from a pilot
From Theory to study conducted in
Practice: An the fall of 1999
Examination of the
Dimock, K. V., et al.
(2000). Applying
Techonolgy to
Restructuring and
Learning: How
http://profiler.hprtec.
org/smf/survey.jsp?s
urvey_id=174
Website for tool: Same as Engaged
http://www.ncrtec.org Learner Profile Tool.
/capacity/profile/prof In Appalachian
www.htm Technology in
Education
http://tweb.lisd.net/b
arbara_brown/tool.ht
ml Summary at:
http://www.pvpusd.k
12.ca.us/tech/techpl
http://www.horizon-
research.com/LSC/
manual/0203/tab6/co
p0203.pdf
Ray & Steele, (2001) http://lofti.tie.net/eval
uation/y2/profile.html
Learning Quest, www.lotilounge.com
(2003), Bober,
Marcie (2004).
Journal of
Technology and
Johnson, D. (1998) http://www.isd77.k12
.mn.us/resources/sur
veydatabase.html
SOTU Interrater Keefe, B., Scherer, Except for the HCT
reliability was above M. J., and McKee, PA, each instrument
80%. ET PA ranged B. G. (1996). has a version
from 86%-91%. Mainepoint: designed for the
MMY rater states, Outcomes of provider of
Lomask, Michael.
Extended
Performance Tasks
for Mathematics,
Science &
Kersaint, Gladis, Adapted from a
Horton, Bob, Stohl, social studies
Hollylynne, and survey in: Berson,
Garofolo, Joe M.J., Mason, C.L.,
(2003). Technology Heinecke, W.F., &
Riggs, Iris, M
Enochs, Larry G
(1993).
Jane Martocchio, J.
J. (1992).
Enoch, Larry G
Others (1993).
Kendall coefficient Tseng, Kuo-hung Subjects were
of concordance .91 Ken. Observation Taiwanese.
Instrument for
Assessing Pre-
service Technology
Small, Ruth V. Instruments are
(1999). An located in the
Exploration of appendices
Motivational
Strategies Used by
Fitzgerald, M.A., et. Survey is in
al., The Gateway to Appendix A
Educational
Materials: An
Evaluation of an
Fitzgerald, M.A., et. Survey is in
al., The Gateway to Appendix B
Educational
Materials: An
Evaluation of an
Davis, B.H., et. al.,
Online collaboration:
supporting novice
teachers as
researchers. Journal
The Milken Family http://www.mff.org/p
Foundation, ubs/PCC.pdf, "a
Instrument available companion to the
from: Professional
F72http://www.mff.or Competency
Wesley, T. http://www.nctp.com/
downloads/assess.p
df
Brown, Carol A.
(2002). Planning
Portfolios: Authentic
Assessment for
Library
Wolf, Sarah (2003). Instrument not
The big six provided
information skills as
a metacognitive
scaffold: A case
Wright, V.H., et. al.,
Challenges of
electronic portfolios:
student perceptions
and experiences.
http://www.necatalyst
.org/AssessmentOnl
y.pdf
Howland, Jane & based on the Seven
Wedman, Julie Principles of Good
(2004). A Process Practice (as defined
Model for Faculty in article)
Development:
Mackinnon, Gregory
(2004). Computer-
Mediated
Communication and
Science
Wilson, Elizabeth For more on
K., Wright Vivian H., preservice teachers
& Stallworth, B. and portfolios see:
Joyce (2003). Meyer, Tusin, and
Secondary Turner (1996),
vivED http://www.vived.com
/preview_survey.htm
?sid=25
http://www.necatalyst
.org/AssessmentOnl
y.pdf
Kreuger, Karla; Used to evaluate
Boboc, Marius; Integrating New
Smaldino, Sharon; Technologies Into
Cornish, Yana; and the Methods of
Callahan, William Education (InTime)
NCES, (1999) http://nces.ed.gov/su
rveys/frss/publication
s/2000102/pdf/questi
onnaire.pdf
http://www.ala.org/al
a/aasl/aaslpubsandjo
urnals/slmrb/slmrcon
tents/volume62003/s
ciencefair.htm#meth
Hewitt, Jim, The article
Pedretti, Erminia, discussed more of
Bencze, Larry, the lesson than an
Vaillancourt, instrument
Barbara Dale, &
Reliability for http://physicsed.buff
Subscales: Lesson alostate.edu/AZTEC/
Design and RTOP/RTOP_full/
Implementation - (complete with 3
.915, Content- videos to develop
a Western Michigan
tool that Vermont
started the VCOT
off of
http://www.sun-
associates.com/eval/
teacherfg.html
Reliability for the http://www.people.m Formerly known as
subscales: Order- emphis.edu/~coe_cr the Tenessee
.835, leadership- ep/instruments/index School Climate
.856, environment- .html Inventory
.846, involvement-
Interrater reliability http://www.serve.org/ In Appalachian
was 67% (95% of csrd/datadriven/som. Technology in
the time raters were html. All CREP Education
within one category instrument Consortium piece
of each other) summaries are "Classroom
Fitzgerald, M.A., et.
al., The Gateway to
Educational
Materials: An
Evaluation of an
J. Kyle Roberts http://insight.southce
ntralrtec.org/ilib/seta
kist/setakist.htm
Brown, L., & Self-esteem was
Alexander, J. shown to increase
(1991). Self-esteem for 138 high school
index. Austin, TX: students receiving
PRO-ED. (Original technology- based
http://www.crede.ucs
c.edu/tools/policy/sio
p/siop.html
Christensen, R.
(1997). INSIGHT,
the South Central
RTEC Instrument
Library and Data
Kreuger, Karla; Modified in: Ward,
Boboc, Marius; J.R., et. al.,
Smaldino, Sharon; Mentoring: A
Cornish, Yana; and Strategy for Change
Callahan, William in Teacher
Strum, Brian W.
(2003). The
Information and
reading preferences
of North Carolina
http://oerl.sri.com/ins In Appalachian
truments/te/obsvclas Technology in
srm/instr76.html Education
Consortium piece
"Classroom
Interrater reliability Wolf, Sarah (2003). rubric provided as
was .91. The big six an appendix
information skills as
a metacognitive
scaffold: A case
Knight, Stephanie
L., Pedersen,
Susan, & Peters,
William (2004).
Connecting the
Wolf, Sarah (2003). Questions were not
The big six listed
information skills as
a metacognitive
scaffold: A case
Butler, Susan No list of questions,
McAleenan & probably not useful
Wiebe, Eric (2003). to this project
Designing a
Technology-Based
Interrater reliability Harada, Violet H. Students composed
of .872 (2002). their journal entries
Personalizing the on laptop computers
Information Search and dated and
Process: A Case saved their entries
Wolf, Sarah (2003).
The big six
information skills as
a metacognitive
scaffold: A case
Bober, Marcie
(2004). Journal of
Technology and
Teacher Education
(2004) 12(2), 159-
Albee, J.J. A Study Same as
of Preservice Administrator
Elementary Survey Regarding
Teachers' Media and
Technology Skill Technology
Wilson, Elizabeth Little detail about
K., Wright Vivian H., instrument
& Stallworth, B.
Joyce (2003).
Secondary
Phye, G. D. (2000).
Engaging
Technology &
Learning
Opportunities:
Yuen, A.H.K., et. al., Validated the
Gender Differences Technology
in Teacher Acceptance Model
Computer (TAM) (Davis
Acceptance. Journal (1989); Davis,
http://www.itrc.ucf.ed
u/other/seirtec/surve
y.html. Study at:
http://www.itrc.ucf.ed
u/other/seirtec/resea
Rosaen, C.L., et. questions were
al., Making constructed from a
Connections: framework
Collaborative developed by Bruce
Approaches to and Levin (nd.).
Interrater reliability http://www.people.m Companion to the
was 86% overall emphis.edu/~coe_cr School Observation
ep/instruments/index Measure
.html
Four Directions
Challenge Grant
Lai, K., et. al.,
Computer
Coordinators as
Change Agents:
Some New Zealand
Logan, Rochelle. Survey in the
(1998). Colorado Appendix
Librarian Internet
Use: Results of a
Survey. School
http://www.mste.uiuc
.edu/users/exner/pt3/
techready.html. Also
appeared in Pilot
Assessment funded
Koehler, Matthew J., Primarily a
Mishra, qualitative study
Punyashloke,
Hershey, Kathryn, &
Peruski, Lisa
Cronbach’s Alpha Phye, G. D. (2000). A matrix score can
was .83. Interrater Engaging be obtained by
reliability ranged Technology & combining the
from .89 to .95 Learning Teacher Technology
(when a one-point Opportunities: Use Survey,
Killian, J., et. al.,
Electronic Discourse
in Preservice
Teacher
Preparation. Journal
Blasi, Heinecke
Akin, Lynn (1998). Both 4th and 8th
Information grade surveys are in
Overload and the appendix
Children: A Survey
of Texas
Associates, B. P.
(1999).
Associates, B. P.
(1999).
http://www.seirtec.or Required at
g/publications/News principal and
Wire/Vol5.3.pdf teacher level in all
Bill and Melinda
Gates' grant
Teacher Led
Technology
Challenge
Cronbach’s Alpha Phye, G. D. (2000). A matrix score can
was .47. Interrater Engaging be obtained by
reliability ranged Technology & combining the
from .86 to .90 Learning Teacher Technology
(when a one-point Opportunities: Use Survey,
http://www.necatalyst
.org/AssessmentOnl
y.pdf
Teacher Led
Technology
Challenge
Utah Technology http://wwwj1.uen.org/
Awareness Project servlet/cgi/utap/utap
(UTAP) help.cgi
Phye, G. D. (2000).
Engaging
Technology &
Learning
Opportunities:
Milken Exchange
University of St.
Thomas
http://www.people.m
emphis.edu/~coe_cr
ep/instruments/index
.html
http://www.henderso In Appalachian
n.k12.ky.us/docume Technology in
nts/Evaluation%20of Education
%20Teacher%20Tec Consortium piece
hnology%20Integrati "Classroom
University of
Northern Iowa
Bober, M., Harrison,
P.J., & Lynch, E.W.
(2000)
Cronbach’s alpha Phye, G. D. (2000). A matrix score can
was .88 Engaging be obtained by
Technology & combining the
Learning Teacher Technology
Opportunities: Use Survey,
Norris and Solloway http://www.tcet.unt.e
(1998) du/research/online/s
napshot.htm
http://www.tcet.unt.e Christensen, R. and This questionnaire
du/research/survey/t Knezek, G. (1999), is composed of well-
ac-r.htm; Knezek, G. et al. validated portions of
http://www.tcet.unt.e (1999), Soloway, E., several attitudinal
du/research/techrept et al. (1999), surveys that have
http://www.tcet.unt.e Knezek, G. , This instrument
du/research/techrept Christensen, R., requires 8-20
/tr97-1.htm Gilmore, E., et al. minutes to
(1999), Owens, C. & complete,
Eaton, V. (1999), depending on the
Christensen, (1997) http://www.tcet.unt.e
du/research/survey/v
iews.htm
Becker & Anderson Constructivist-based
(1998). Teaching, discussion of the
Learning, and best practices in
Computing: 1998. A education.
national survery of
Reliability http://ois.unomaha.e
Coefficients: Social du/tapsi/analysis/.
and Ethical- .9636, Also appeared in
Teacher Strategy Pilot Assessment
Scale- .9456, High funded by NE
Denes, V., (1998)
Wiencke, W.R.
Exemption exam for
an introductory
education
technology course:
Bradshaw, L.K. based on (Joyce &
Technology for Showers, 1995;
teaching and NSDC, 1995).
learning: strategies Note: applied CBAM
for staff framework to the
In Appalachian
Technology in
Education
Consortium piece
"Classroom
http://www.necatalyst In Appalachian
.org/MTimms.tech.o Technology in
bserv.instrmnt%20fin Education
al1.pdf Consortium piece
"Classroom
Ropp, M. M.
Assistant Professor
of Technology
Education,
University of New
Boston Public http://www.doe.mass
Schools in 1997 .edu/edtech/standard
s/tool.pdf
http://www.people.m
emphis.edu/~coe_cr
ep/instruments/index
.html
Dimock, K. V., et al.
(2000). Applying
Techonolgy to
Restructuring and
Learning: How
SEDL
http://www.wested.or In Appalachian
g/techplan/pdfs/Tech Technology in
ObservForm.pdf Education
Consortium piece
"Classroom
In Appalachian
Technology in
Education
Consortium piece
"Classroom
http://www.iste.org/b
ookstore/excerpts/el
ecbc_lesson-
observ.doc Also
found in the book:
http://www.tea.state.t Patterned after the
x.us/technology/etac/ CEO's Forum STaR
campus_txstar/ chart. In
Appalachian
Technology in
http://www.necatalyst
.org/AssessmentOnl
y.pdf
Nickell and Pinto,
1996
Stevens, (1982)
Gordon, Carol A. Compared 5
(2000). The Effects "concept mappers"
of Concept Mapping to 5 "non-concept
on the Searching mappers"
Behavior of Tenth-
Cassady, J. C.
(2000).
Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation
study, the Teacher
Leadership Project
2000 Evaluation
http://wwwj1.uen.org/ In Appalachian
UTAP Technology in
Education
Consortium piece
"Classroom
http://www.vismt.org/ In Appalachian
programs/leadership/ Technology in
vcot.html Education
Consortium piece
"Classroom
Van Es, E.A., et. al., designed in this
Learning to Notice: study
Scaffolding New
Teachers'
Interpretations of
Intercoder Beck, R. J., King, A. “[A] controlled
reliabilities for Marshall, S. K. experimental study
students' reflections (2002) Effects of to test our
were .98 for Videocase hypothesis about
language arts, .90 construction on effects of videocase
Knight, Stephanie Examples of scored
L., Pedersen, vignettes in
Susan, & Peters, Appendix. Does not
William (2004). seem rigorous or
Connecting the worthwhile
Avraamidou, L., et.
al., Exploring the
Influence of Web-
Based Portfolio
Development on
http://www.necatalyst
.org/AssessmentOnl
y.pdf
Stallings, L. Lynn &
Koellner-Clark,
Karen (2003). Re-
creating Graduate
Teacher Education
Kreuger, Karla; Used to evaluate
Boboc, Marius; Integrating New
Smaldino, Sharon; Technologies Into
Cornish, Yana; and the Methods of
Callahan, William Education (InTime)
Cates, W. M., Price,
B., and Bodzin A. M.
(2003).
"Implementing
Technology-Rich
Lowther, D. L.,
Ross, S. M., and
Morrison, G. M.
(2003). "When Each
One Has One: The
Slekar, T. S.,
Lachance, A., Klein,
B. S., & Klein, K. W.
(2003). "The
environmental
Cassady, J. C.
(2000). The impact
on families: Spring
2000 A.C.T. Now!
Preliminary Report.
Brusilovsky, P.
(2003). "Adaptive
Navigation Support
in Educational
Hypermedia: The
Foster, J. L., A.
(2003). "Individual
Differences in
Learning
Entrepeneurship &
Gauss, B., Urbos, L.
(2003). "Individual
Differences in
Navigation Between
Sharable Content
Ghinea, G., Chen,
S. Y. (2003).
"Cognitive Styles on
Perceptual
Disturbed
Graff, M. (2003).
"Systems and
Cognitive Style."
British Journal of
Educational
Hutinger P.L., J. J.
(2000)
Jamieson-Proctor,
R., Burnett, P. C.
(2002). "Elementary
Students, Creativity,
and Technology:
Johnson, R.,
Hegarty, J. R.
(2003). "Websites
as Educational
Motivators for Adults
Konradt, U., Flip, R.,
and Hoffman, S.
(2003). "Flow
Experience and
Positive Affect
Merrill, P. F. (2003).
"Entering Skills of
Students Enrolling
in an Educational
Technology
Nichols, L. M.
(2002).
"Keyboarding Aids:
Do Added Sensor
Keys Really Help?"
Richardson, J. T. E.
(2003). "Approaches
to Studying and
Perceptions of
Academic Quality in
Sabry, K. B., L.
(2003). "Web-Based
Learning Interaction
& Learning Styles."
British Journal of
SEDL (2002). Active
Learning with
Technology
Underwood, J. S.,
A. (2003).
"Academic Offences
and E-Learning:
Individual
Cole, K., Simkins, Full descriptions of
Michael and Puneul, these methods can
William R. Learning be found in annual
to Teach with and final evaluation
Technology: reports available
Yaghi, H. M.,
Ghaith, G. M.
(2002). "Correlates
of Computing
Confidence Among
Bober, M. J. (2003).
"Using technology to
spark reform in
preservice
education."
Bodzin, A. M., Park,
J. C. (2002). "Using
a nonrestrictive web-
based forum to
promote reflective
Rosaen, C. L.,
Schram, P., &
Berbel-Eisenmann,
B. (2002). "Using
hypermedia
Sonnenwald, D. H.
S. B. L. (2003).
"Higher Education:
Exploring Learning
Styles, Preferences,
Related docs
