Massoli v. Regan Media, et al - 96

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
8
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/14/2008
language:
pages:
0
Massoli v. Regan Media, et al Doc. 96 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pending before the Court are two Applications to Withdraw as Couns el for P laintiff/Counterdefendant and Counterdefendants. [Dkts. 83, 85]. Subsequent to the filing of the Applicat ions , M onica A. Limon-Wynn and David E. Rauch of Snell & Wilmer LLP J EN N A) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) REGAN M EDIA and JUDITH REGAN, an) ) individual, ) Defendants. ) ) REGAN M EDIA, INC., a New York) corporation, and JUDITH REGAN, an) ) individual, ) Defendants/Count erclaimants,) ) ) vs. ) J EN N A M A SSO LI, p /k/a J EN N A) ) JAM ESON, an individual, ) ) Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, ) ) and ) ) JAY GRDINA, an individual, ) ) Counterdefendant. ) J EN N A M A SSO LI JAM ESON, p /k/a No. CIV 05-0854-PHX-EHC ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Case 2:05-cv-00854-EHC Document 96 Filed 04/05/2006 Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 filed N ot ices of A p p earance on behalf of Plaint iff/Count erdefendant and Counterdefendants. [Dkts. 92, 93]. Defendants/Counterclaimants do not object to the Applications. [Dkts. 89, 90]. The Applications to Withdraw will be granted. Pending before the Court is Plaint iff/Counterdefendant and Counterdefendants' M otion for Extension of Time t o file a Response to Defendants/Counterclaimants' Second M otion to Compel and Request for Sanctions. [Dkt. 87]. The Res p ons e to the M otion to Compel and Request for Sanctions was belatedly filed on M arch 24, 2006. [Dkt. 94]. Plaint iff/Counterdefendant and Counterdefendants request an extension of time due to the withdrawal of their former attorneys. Defendants/Counterclaimants oppose an extension. [Dkt. 88]. The Court finds good cause for an extension of time. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Applications to Withdraw [dkts. 83, 85] are GRANTED; Bernard M . Brodsky and Jeffrey F. Reina of Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury & Cambria, LLP and J ames Lawrence Blair and Roger William Hall of Renaud Cook Drury M esaros, PA are withdrawn as Couns el for P laint iff/Count erdefendant and Counterdefendants. IT IS FURTHER O RD ERED t hat P laint iff/Count erdefendant and Counterdefendants' M otion for Extension of Time [dkt. 87] is GRANTED. DATED this 4th day of April, 2006. Case 2:05-cv-00854-EHC Document 96 -2Filed 04/05/2006 Page 2 of 2

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
Massoli v. Regan Media, et al - 52
Views: 61  |  Downloads: 0
Massoli v. Regan Media, et al - 58
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
Massoli v. Regan Media, et al - 55
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
Massoli v. Regan Media, et al - 98
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
Massoli v. Regan Media, et al - 33
Views: 21  |  Downloads: 0
Massoli v. Regan Media, et al - 75
Views: 12  |  Downloads: 0
Massoli v. Regan Media, et al - 72
Views: 12  |  Downloads: 0
Massoli v. Regan Media, et al - 93
Views: 21  |  Downloads: 0