Acrobat PDF

YOUNG v. MCDONOUGH et al - 4

You must be logged in to download this document
Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
24
downloads:
0
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/14/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
YOUNG v. MCDONOUGH et al Doc. 4 Case 3:06-cv-00098-RV-EMT Document 4 Filed 03/14/2006 Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION DARRYL V. YOUNG, Petitioner, vs. JAMES R. McDONOUGH,1 Respondent. ________________________________________/ ORDER Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, as well a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 1, 2). Petitioner failed to provide the requisite supporting documentation for his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, specifically, a prisoner consent form and financial certificate with an attached certified copy of his trust fund account statement. Therefore, the motion will be denied without prejudice to Petitioner’s refiling a complete motion with the required supporting documentation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The clerk of court is directed to change the docket to reflect that James R. Case No. 3:06cv98/RV/EMT McDonough is substituted for James Crosby as Respondent. 2. prejudice. 3. The clerk shall send Petitioner a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a prisoner Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED without consent form and financial certificate approved for use in the Northern District. James R. McDonough succeeded James Crosby as Secretary for the Department of Corrections, and is automatically substituted as Respondent. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d)(1). 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:06-cv-00098-RV-EMT Document 4 Filed 03/14/2006 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2 4. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order Petitioner shall (1) pay the $5.00 filing fee, or (2) submit a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the requisite prisoner consent form and financial certificate, including an attached computer printout of the transactions in his prison account. 5. Failure to comply with this order as instructed may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court. DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of March 2006. /s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case No.: 3:06cv98/RV/EMT
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
YOUNG v. MCDONOUGH et al - 4
Views: 24  |  Downloads: 0
Andersen v. Young et al - 4
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 0
Young v. Lacey et al - 4
Views: 15  |  Downloads: 0
Young v. Primus et al - 4
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 0
Young v. Bryant et al - 4
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
Young v. Books et al - 4
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
Young v. Kucera et al - 4
Views: 31  |  Downloads: 0
Young v. State of Washington et al - 4
Views: 29  |  Downloads: 0
Young v. The State of Florida et al - 4
Views: 35  |  Downloads: 0
Young v. Reed Elsevier, Inc. et al - 4
Views: 31  |  Downloads: 0
v. Young et al - 5
Views: 31  |  Downloads: 0
Andersen v. Young et al - 3
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0