professional documents
home
Profile
docsters
request
Blogs
Upload
about me
contact me
user photo
Tim Stanley
Programmer
Justia
submit clear
Winston v. Warden Doc. 6 Case 1:06-cv-10732-TLL-CEB Document 6 Filed 03/02/2006 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION RAYMOND WINSTON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent. ____________________________________/ ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL This matter is before the Court on the petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel filed on February 17, 2006. In his motion, the petitioner states that he lacks funds to hire his own counsel and that he therefore should have counsel appointed for him. The petitioner has no absolute right to be represented by counsel on federal habeas corpus review. See Abdur-Rahman v. Mich. Dep’t of Corr., 65 F.3d 489, 492 (6th Cir. 1995). “‘[A]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is . . . a matter within the discretion of the court. It is a privilege and not a right.’” Childs v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382, 1384 (6th Cir. 1987) (quoting United States v. Madden, 352 F.2d 792, 793 (9th Cir. 1965)); see also Hoggard v. Purkett, 29 F.3d 469, 471 (8th Cir. 1994) (“In exercising its discretion, the district court should consider the legal complexity of the case, the factual complexity of the case, and the petitioner’s ability to investigate and present his claims, along with any other relevant factors.”). In this case, the interests of justice do not require appointment of counsel at this time. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254, Rules 6(a) and 8(c). If, however, the Court determines that an evidentiary hearing or discovery are necessary, the Court may revisit the Case No. 06-10732-BC Honorable David M. Lawson Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:06-cv-10732-TLL-CEB Document 6 Filed 03/02/2006 Page 2 of 2 petitioner’s motion. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel [dkt # 3] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. s/David M. Lawson DAVID M. LAWSON United States District Judge Dated: March 2, 2006 PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on March 2, 2006. s/Tracy A. Jacobs TRACY A. JACOBS -2-
rate this doc
email this doc
embed this doc
add to folder
digg reddit stumble delicious
flag this doc
5
0
not rated
0
4/14/2008
English
search termpage on Googletimes searched
Preview

Mullican v. Warden Stine - 6

justia 4/15/2008 | 14 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Shiflett v. Charles T. Felts. Warden - 6

justia 4/15/2008 | 6 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

(DLB)(HC) Ramiro Munoz Garza v. Warden - 6

justia 4/15/2008 | 8 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Mullican v. Warden Stine - 7

justia 4/15/2008 | 9 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

(HC) Sanchez v. Warden - 3

justia 4/15/2008 | 5 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

(HC) Figueira v. Warden - 3

justia 4/15/2008 | 7 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Francis v. Warden - 18

justia 4/15/2008 | 36 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Hines v. Warden - 4

justia 4/14/2008 | 6 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

WELLS v. WARDEN - 4

justia 4/14/2008 | 9 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Wallace v. Warden - 4

justia 4/14/2008 | 17 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

White v. Warden - 2

justia 4/14/2008 | 20 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Lewis v. Warden - 7

justia 4/14/2008 | 13 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Hearns v. NH State Prison, Warden - 6

justia 4/14/2008 | 4 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 81

justia 4/16/2008 | 261 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Taylor et al v. Acxiom Corporation et al - 62

justia 4/16/2008 | 218 | 3 | 0 | legal
Preview

Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al v. RDR Books et al - 73

justia 4/16/2008 | 173 | 1 | 0 | legal
Preview

Stiener et al v. Apple, Inc. et al - 73

justia 4/16/2008 | 280 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Trujillo v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al - 86

justia 4/16/2008 | 358 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Ticketmaster LLC v. RMG Technologies Inc et al - 105

justia 4/16/2008 | 155 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al - 51

justia 4/16/2008 | 209 | 1 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 78

justia 4/16/2008 | 167 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 79

justia 4/16/2008 | 176 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 75

justia 4/16/2008 | 265 | 0 | 0 | legal
 
review this doc