Rodrique, et al v. Eckerd Corporation, et al - 283

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
8
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/14/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
Rodrique, et al v. Eckerd Corporation, et al Doc. 283 Case 2:03-cv-00519-VMC-SPC Document 283 Filed 03/02/2006 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION DELICE RODRIQUE and MARTIN SCHAEFER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. ECKERD CORPORATION, Defendant. / ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed with “Bellwether” Trials (Doc. # 267), which was filed on February 6, 2006. Plaintiff seeks an order allowing Plaintiffs to proceed with “Bellwether” trials.1 Plaintiff’s motion states, “This Plaintiff Case No. 2:03-cv-519-FtM-33SPC and four Opt-in Plaintiffs, Abiloa George, William Nesbitt, Teresa The court in In re: Chevron, 109 F.3d 1016, 1019 (5th Cir. 1997), described “bellwether trials” as follows: A bellwether trial is designed to achieve its value ascertainment function for settlement purposes or to answer troubling causation or liability issues common to the universe of claimants has a core element representativeness– that is, the same must be a randomly selected one of sufficient size so as to achieve statistical significance to the desired level of confidence in the result obtained. Such samples are selected by the application of the science of inferential statistics. The essence of the science of inferential statistics is that one may confidently draw inferences about the whole from a representative sample of the whole. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:03-cv-00519-VMC-SPC Document 283 Filed 03/02/2006 Page 2 of 2 Tomlinson, and Steve Schnitizius could reasonably present appropriate ‘test’ cases for the remaining 2,706 Opt-in Plaintiffs in this Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. collective proceeding.” (Doc. # 267 at 1). There are a variety of valid bases to deny the present motion to proceed with “Bellwether” trials. The Court denies the motion as an imprudent allocation of judicial resources. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed with “Bellwether” Trials (Doc. # 267) is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Ft. Myers, Florida, this 2nd day of March, 2006. Copies: All Counsel of Record 2

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
ETD_GRAD.pdf
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
SSIONSÉC E ICI TRE ENTREPRIS LE NOM DE VO
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
THE HISTORY OF ANTISEMITISM
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Materials of Art and Archaeology
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Overtraining Syndrome
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0