Willingham v. Avery Mitchell Correctional Institute et al - 2

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
29
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/14/2008
language:
pages:
0
Willingham v. Avery Mitchell Correctional Institute et al Doc. 2 Case 1:06-cv-00006-GCM Document 2 Filed 01/20/2006 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:06CV6-3-MU CHARLES DEAN WILLINGHAM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) AVERY MITCHELL INSTITUTION ) MAIL ROOM STAFF et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) ORDER Plaintiff seeks leave to file this 42 U.S.C. §1983 Complaint in forma pauperis. In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that the staff at Avery Mitchell Correctional Institution opened his outgoing mail. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), a prisoner may not bring a civil action under this statute, if on three or more occasions, he has brought an action or an appeal in the federal court that was dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Court records indicate that Plaintiff has filed at least three previous cases in the Eastern District of North Carolina which have been dismissed as frivolous.1 Petitioner is well aware of the “three strikes” rule as he has had at least four lawsuits dismissed on this basis.2 Moreover, since 1995, Plaintiff has filed a total of nineteen § 1983 complaints, including the instant case, in this district and in the 1 See Eastern District 5:96-CT-167-H, 5:96-CT-188-BO; 5:98-CT-720-BR. See Eastern District 5:00-CT-434; 5:01-CT-693; 5:01-CT-802; 5:01-CT-886 2 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:06-cv-00006-GCM Document 2 Filed 01/20/2006 Page 2 of 3 Eastern District.3 Accordingly, Plaintiff is barred from filing this action in forma pauperis, and this suit is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). See Eastern District 5:96-ct-167; 5:96-ct-188; 4:97cv323; 5:00ct434; 5:02ct484; 5:01ct693; 5:98ct720; 5:01ct764; 5:01ct802; 5:97ct839; 5:98ct855; 5:01ct886; 5:96ct1019; Western District 1:96cv37; 5:01cv157; 1:01cv203; 1:98cv261 and 3:01cv508 3 Case 1:06-cv-00006-GCM Document 2 Filed 01/20/2006 Page 3 of 3 Signed: January 20, 2006

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
Willingham v Crooke (041548P)
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Willingham multiple intelligences
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 1
(HC) Chanes v. Wrigley, et al. - 4
Views: 54  |  Downloads: 0
(HC) Repstad v. Wrigley et al - 4
Views: 76  |  Downloads: 0
(HC) Zuniga v. Wrigley et al - 4
Views: 20  |  Downloads: 0
(HC) Gullion v. Wrigley et al - 3
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 0
(HC) Gossman v. Wrigley, et al. - 4
Views: 16  |  Downloads: 0
Heald et al v Engler et al (03a0308p-06)
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
(DLB) (HC) Brun v. Wrigley et al - 3
Views: 27  |  Downloads: 0
Willingham v Crooke (061293U)
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
US v Willingham (971191U)
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Willingham v City of Jacksonville (961396U)
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0