Myanmar Burma

Document Sample
Myanmar Burma Powered By Docstoc
					Myanmar (Burma)
Myanmar’s authoritarian military junta is slowly
expanding access to the Internet while main-
taining one of the world’s most restrictive sys-
tems of control. Despite the fact that less than
1 percent of Myanmar’s population access the
Internet, the government has targeted online
independent media and dissent with the same
commitment it has demonstrated to stifling tra-
ditional media and voices for reform.

Background                                                the country’s first disclosed outbreak of bird flu.
Myanmar’s abysmal human rights record wors-               The government suppressed reports on a wide
ened in 2006,1 prompting increased pressure               range of additional issues, from rising cement
from the United States, the EU, and ASEAN for             and fuel prices to restrictions on private banks,4
reform. In September the U.N. Security Council            and jailed two journalists who photographed the
approved the U.S. government’s proposal to                new, remote capital at Pyinmana.5
put Myanmar formally on the Council’s agenda.2
Leaders from the State Peace and Development              Internet in Myanmar
Council (SPDC) claim neocolonialists are infiltrat-       The reported number of Internet users in 2005
ing media technology on pretexts of protecting            ranged from 78,000 to nearly 300,000, at the upper
human rights and countering drug trafficking.3            limit representing approximately 0.56 percent of
Other sensitive issues included political and             Myanmar’s population.6 Myanmar remains one
constitutional reform, separatist movements, reli-        of thirty countries with less than 1 percent Internet
gious and ethnic minorities, forced and child             penetration.7 Most users access the Internet in
labor, access by humanitarian organizations, and          cybercafés (starting at USD0.30 per hour, down

Results at a glance
                           No evidence     Suspected    Selective     Substantial     Pervasive
Filtering                   of filtering    filtering    filtering     filtering       filtering

 Political                                                                               ●
 Social                                                                    ●
 Conflict/security                                                         ●
 Internet tools                                                            ●

Other factors                  Low          Medium        High       Not applicable

 Transparency                                  ●
 Consistency                    ●
Key IndIcatoRs
                                                                                       worst                                       best

 GDP per capita, PPP (constant 2000 international $) ........ 1,446                        3.50
 Life expectancy at birth (years) ............................................. 61         4.19
 Literacy rate (% of people age 15+) ..................................... 90              6.00
 Human development index (out of 177)............................... 130                   3.52
 Rule of law (out of 208) ...................................................... 202       1.87
 Voice and accountability (out of 208) .................................. 208              0.69
 Digital opportunity index (out of 180) .................................. 176             1.36
 Internet users (% of population) ........................................... 0.1          3.07
                                                                                       0       1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9    10

Source (by indicator): IMF 2006; World Bank 2006a, 2006a; UNDP 2006; World Bank 2006c, 2006c; ITU 2006, 2004

from USD0.75 in 2004 and USD0.95–1.50 in                                      straints. As in other areas, however, the state’s
2003),8 which are said to be present in five cities                           policies are difficult to assess because they are
but planned to reach 324 townships within three                               rarely published or explained.
years.9 Connection speeds are slow, however, as                                     Network-ready computers must be regis-
broadband is available primarily to government                                tered (for a fee) with the MPT; failure to do so
and businesses and used mostly for Internet                                   can result in fines and prison sentences of seven
telephony via Voice-over Internet Protocol (VoIP),                            to fifteen years.14 Sharing registered Internet
though the government pledged to bring ADSL to                                connections is also punishable by revocation of
every township by the end of 2006.10 There are                                access and presumably similar “legal action.”15
only two Internet service providers (ISPs) allowed                            Broad laws and regulations confer power upon
in Myanmar: state-owned telecom Myanmar                                       the SPDC, which is also involved in all judicial
Posts and Telecom (MPT), which is the only                                    appointments,16 to punish citizens harshly for any
source of new Internet services,11 and Myanmar                                activity deemed detrimental to national interests
Teleport (MMT, formerly Bagan Cybertech), which                               or security. Regulations issued in 2000 subjected
is reportedly the infrastructure arm of Myanmar’s                             online content to the same kind of strict filtering
Internet system and responsible for blocking                                  that the Press Scrutiny and Registration Division
content. In September 2005 the Ahaed Co.                                      carries out (despite print media being almost
of Myanmar and the Canadian ICT company                                       exclusively state owned):17 users must obtain
Teleglobe reportedly signed a memorandum                                      MPT permission before creating Web pages, and
of understanding to establish a private ISP12    .                            they cannot post anything “detrimental” to the
Reliability is also an issue: in May 2006 the entire                          government or simply related to politics. The MPT
country was disconnected for four days because                                can “amend and change regulations on the use
of alleged damage to an undersea cable.13                                     of the Internet without prior notice.”18
                                                                                    Costs indeed limit access significantly: even
Legal and regulatory frameworks                                               households that can afford a PC and long-
Myanmar heavily regulates online access and                                   distance connection fees outside the capital
content via legal, regulatory, and economic con-                              Yangon (Rangoon) and Mandalay cannot pay
USD35/month19 for a broadband account. Dialup         com), both MMT and MPT blocked many major
access leaves them with state-monitored e-mail        independent news sites reporting on Myanmar.
(free services are blocked)20 and a small col-        This included English language publications
lection of pre-approved sites on the country’s        such as the Irawaddy, Mizzima News, and
intranet, known as the Myanmar Wide Web.21 As         BurmaNet News (, as well
for cybercafés, promoted since 2002 by a “Public      as sites in the national language (www.burma
Access Centers” (PAC) program for e-mail and Only MPT blocked the Voice of America
gaming purposes,22 the government has been            Web sites ( in English and
urging business owners to legally register as         Burmese, while MMT targeted regional news sites
PACs. This requires them to log user identities       such as the Times of India and Asia Observer.
and Web sites visited and send the information               Sites containing content on human rights
back to the state-owned Myanmar Info-tech.23          advocacy and democratic reform continued
There are reports, however, that many tech-savvy      to be a priority for blocking. A number of
users risk connecting to proxy servers abroad         nongovernmental organization (NGO) sites
and thereby access the entire Web undetect-           with different levels of involvement in Myanmar
ed.24                                                 human rights issues were blocked (Open Society
                                                      Institute at; www.burmacampaign.
ONI testing results                          Within this group were Web sites docu-
Testing was conducted on the two ISPs in              menting the persecution of ethnic minorities and
Myanmar, Myanmar Teleport (MMT) and Myanmar           the personal Web site of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi.
Posts and Telecom (MPT). Both MMT and MPT             Other continuities in blocking included coalitions
filtered extensively and focused overwhelmingly       for democratic change in Myanmar, such as the
on independent media, political reform, and           Web site of the coalition government of the Union
human rights sites relating to Myanmar, as well       of Burma (, opposition move-
as free Web-based e-mail services and circum-         ments (, and rights groups
vention tools.                                        (
       Both ISPs blocked roughly the same num-               There were significant differences in filter-
ber of circumvention tools, including Proxify,        ing between the two ISPs. Of the sites found to
Guardster, and Anonymizer (although only MPT          be blocked in Myanmar, less than a third were
blocked                          blocked on both ISPs. The remaining blocked
       In June 2006 Gmail and Gtalk were made         sites were blocked on one ISP or the other, but not
inaccessible and Skype was banned25—a report-         both. MMT blocked almost exclusively sites with
ed attempt not only to censor communications          ties to Myanmar, where the term “Burma” in the
but also to preserve the government’s monopoly        URL was one of the common threads among the
over telephone and e-mail services as MPT’s           filtered sites, from human rights groups (www.
revenues dipped.26 ONI testing confirmed that; critical of the
although no search engines (MSN, Google,              government to peripheral personal sites (such
and so on) were blocked, Yahoo! Mail, Gmail,          as a site with photographs of Myanmar). MPT fil-
Hushmail, and mail2web were blocked by both           tered many more sites from the global list, block-
ISPs, while MPT took the precaution of blocking       ing a large majority of the pornography Web sites
thirteen additional e-mail sites, including Hotmail   tested, while MMT filtered very few such sites.
and Fastmail. Only MPT blocked Skype.                        Several curious results indicated that the
       In addition to filtering Radio Free Asia       Myanmar government does not take an entirely
( and OhmyNews (www.ohmynews.             systematic approach to filtering. For example,
Amnesty International ( was                   7. International Telecommunication Union, ICT
blocked entirely on MPT, but MMT filtered only
several Amnesty reports on the country. Other                 8. BBC Monitoring International Reports, “Burma
significant variations among the ISPs, including                 Internet users use proxy servers to visit blocked
the inconsistent blocking of pornography and                     websites,” October 17, 2006 (includes text from
                                                                 Ko Thet, “A hole in the Net,” The Irawaddy, October
gambling sites that suggest distinct filtering
                                                                 1, 2006); The Guardian Online, “The great firewall
methods, are unusual given both ISPs are state-                  of Burma,” July 22, 2003; and Reporters Without
run.                                                             Borders, Internet: Burma,
                                                              9. Xinhua News Agency, “Internet users in Myanmar
Conclusion                                                       number nearly 300,000,” November 8, 2006.
Although Myanmar does not deploy its filtering               10. Ibid.
regime with the same sophistication and breadth              11. Xinhua News Service, “Myanmar to grant for-
                                                                 eign, local engagement in emerging cyber city,”
as other countries with similarly repressive online
                                                                 November 28, 2006.
environments, the paranoid grip of the SPDC is               12.
felt in the restrictions on access, the high cost of             news-agency-myanmar-to-expand-internet-services/.
services, and the frequently brutal clampdown on             13. BBC Monitoring International Reports, “Burma’s
                                                                 Internet link with outside world fails for fourth day”
information and expression in all other spheres                  (text by official Chinese agency Xinhua), May 16,
of Burmese life. This may be why there are not                   2006.
many known cases of cyber-dissidents in cus-                 14. Computer Science Development Law, sections 27,
                                                                 28, September 20, 1996,
tody, given that people have been arrested for
anything from publishing subversive poetry to lis-           15. Digital Freedom Network, “The new Net regulations
tening to the BBC or Radio Free Asia in public.27                in Burma,” January 31, 2000, archived copy available
                                                             16. Ibid.
NOTES                                                        17. International Press Institute, 2005 World Press
  1. U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on                Freedom Review: Burma,
     Human Rights Practices 2005: Burma, http://www.             cms/ipi/freedom_detail.html?country=/KW0001/                   KW0005/KW0112/.
  2. Summary statement by the Secretary-General of           18. Digital Freedom Network, “The new Net regulations
     the United Nations on matters of which the Security         in Burma,” January 31, 2000, archived copy available
     Council is seized and on the stage reached in               at
     their consideration, UN Doc. S/2006/10/Add.36,    
     September 22, 2006.                                     19. BaganNet, “Access Services,” October 30,2006,
  3. Gen. Than Shwe, 85th Anniversary National Day     
     Message, November 24, 2005,            broadband_ADSL.asp.
     mm/news/24nov05.html.                                   20. BaganNet, “About mail4u,” October 2006, http://
  4. Financial Times, “Burma’s privately owned presses 
     are on a roll; Private sector journals are gaining          aboutmail4u-e.asp.
     popularity in spite of heavy pressure from state cen-   21. Shawn W. Crispin, “A quantum leap in censorship,”
     sors,” December 8, 2005.                                    Asia Times Online, September 22, 2006, http://www.
  5. Reporters Without Borders, “Court upholds three-  
     year sentences for journalists who photographed             HI22Ae01.html.
     new capital,” June 27, 2006,        22. BBC Monitoring International Reports, “Burma
     article.php3?id_article=16898.                              Internet users use proxy servers to visit blocked
  6. Xinhua News Agency, “Internet users in Myanmar              websites,” October 17, 2006 (includes text from Ko
     number nearly 300,000,” November 8, 2006;                   Thet, “A hole in the Net,” The Irawaddy, October 1,
     International Telecommunication Union, World                2006).
     Telecommunication Indicators 2006.
23. The Myanmar Times, “Burma enforces licensing of
    Internet cafes,” March 20, 2006, (text of report in
    English by Khin Hninn Phyu, reprinted by the BBC)
24. Democratic Voice of Burma, “Press freedom in
    Burma,” May 7, 2006,
    php?id=7010; and Shawn L. Nance, “How to fool
    the cyber spooks,” The Irrawaddy Online, March 27,
    4504&z=104 (inset).
25. Indo-Asian News Service, “Google, Gmail banned in
    Myanmar: Surfers,” June 30, 2006.
26. Reporters Without Borders, “Internet increasingly
    resembles an Intranet as foreign services blocked,”
    July 4, 2006,
    id_article=18202; The Irrawaddy, “ Junta blocks
    Google and Gmail,” June 30, 2006.
27. See, for example, Mizzima News, “Four dissidents
    sentenced up to 19 years in prison for anti-government
    poems,” June 21, 2006,

Shared By: