Management Strategies Ferret Mustela furo poisoning

Document Sample
Management Strategies Ferret Mustela furo  poisoning Powered By Docstoc
					Management: Ferret (Mustela furo)
Compiled by IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist
Group(ISSG)

Contents :

1. General Considerations
            Need for on-going control due to re-invasion

2. Monitoring / Tracking
            Trained dogs
            Tracking tunnels
            Field surveys

3. Preventative measures
            Exclusion from islands

4. Physical control
            Trapping

5. Biological control
            Development of canine distemper virus

6. Chemical Control
            Pesticide use (Diphacinone, 1080, MEZP)
            Potential harmful effects on non-target species

7. Integrative management
            Monitoring of affected bird species
            Research into positive outcomes of stoat control
            Habitat modification

8. Research
            Alternative toxins and bait

9. Ethical Considerations
            Ethical dilemmas
            New Zealand legislation
1. General Considerations

Ferret populations often recover quickly from control due to reinvasion from surrounding
areas. The reduction in ferret numbers decreases intra-specific competitive pressures on
the remaining populous, increasing the individual‟s chance of survival. Therefore
ongoing control measures are necessary to provide sufficient control, maintain ferret
numbers at a low level and protection of any vulnerable bird (or other) species (Landcare
Research 2005).

2. Monitoring / Tracking

Dogs (trained to detect mustelids) can be used to find and monitor ferrets in farmland
(Ragg and Clapperton 2004). Snow-tracking has also been used to detect ferret activity
(King 1994) and conservation managers and researchers at mainland sites throughout
New Zealand now commonly use tracking tunnels as a method of indexing rodent and
mustelid abundance (Gillies and Williams Unpub.).

3. Preventative measures

Islands which are free from predatory mammals such as the ferret should be kept free.
About 28 islands have stoats (all within 1-2 km from shore) but none have weasels or
ferrets (King 1994). While no mustelids can be permanently eradicated from anywhere in
New Zealand (not even the offshore islands) (King 1994) people should endeavour to
maintain the ferret-free status of these island ecosystems. This can be done by public
education and prohibiting the transport and transfer of such mammals to these islands.

4. Physical Control

Up until 1995, ferret control in New Zealand was usually only conducted by the
Department of Conservation to protect threatened wildlife. Leg-hold traps (eg: gin traps)
were used and trapping was restricted to small areas (Ragg and Clapperton 2004). Once
the ferret was recognised as a possible vector of Tb to cattle and deer, research interest in
ferret control escalated and control of ferrets in New Zealand is now generally carried out
through on-going trapping or poisoning (Ragg and Clapperton 2004; Landcare Research
2005). Leg-hold traps and the Timms trap are still often used in New Zealand, however,
live traps are being used more frequently as they are more humane and cause less harm to
non-target species (Ragg and Clapperton 2004). At least four kill traps tested have proven
to be less than satisfactory at delivering a (relatively) humane death, namely the Timms
trap, Timms tunnel trap, tunnel trap and SAF trap (Warburton and Connor 2004) (see 8.
Ethical Considerations). It should also be noted that trapping is a labour-intensive, time-
consuming and costly (Spurr et al. 2005). Notably, ferrets are controlled via trapping in
the Shetland archipelago (United Kingdom) by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH Pers.
Comm.) and as by-catch in mink control projects in the Western Isles (United Kingdom)
(Moore Roy and Helyar 2003).
Landcare Research (2005) state that setting traps near vegetation cover, rabbit signs or
animal tracks improved capture rates, while other tests found that ferrets were most often
caught in traps set close to waterways (Young 1998, in Clapperton 2001). As a general
rule, a mixture of trap types is probably the best as individual animals will respond
differently to different trap types and there will always be some animals that will avoid
one trap type but will go into another (Ragg and Clapperton 2004). Scent is more
important than a visual cue for ferrets (but not for stoats) and traps may be baited with an
artificial scent lures (Ragg and Clapperton 2004). In New Zealand rabbit meat is usually
used as a lure but hare, possum, horse meat and a large variety of other bait options are
also used (see Ragg and Clapperton 2004). However the natural curiosity of these
animals makes them easy to catch and they will even investigate traps without bait in
their territory.

Setting traps near vegetation cover, rabbit signs or other animal tracks improved capture
rates, while ferrets were most often caught in traps set close to waterways (Landcare
Research 2005; Young 1998, in Clapperton 2001). Ferrets are less easily caught in traps
in the spring, and culling in autumn gives more success than culling in spring (Norbury,
Unpubl., in Barlow and Norbury, 2001; Landcare Research 2005). Byrom (2002) agrees
with this assessment and suggests that the most effective time for ferret control is
following dispersal of juveniles (late autumn in New Zealand). Young ferrets have been
observed to move up to 45 km from their home territory, and are likely to colonise areas
that have had predator control the previous spring.

5. Biological Control

Animal welfare has is an important factor in the selection process for possible biological
control options. There is some interest in developing the canine distemper virus as a
potential form of biological control for ferrets (O'Keefe 1995; R. Peebles Pers. Comm., in
Clapperton 2001).

6. Chemical Control

Sodium monofluoroacetate (1080) and diphacinone are both anticoagulant poisons which
can be used to kill ferrets (Spurr et al. 2005). Interestingly a New Zealand trial involving
the use of diphacinone for cats was halted due to adverse publicity, despite being used for
other species, including ferrets (Warburton and Eason 1999, in Littin and Mellor 2005).
In New Zealand diphacinone can be used without a license and is less hazardous than
1080, which may make it the more desirable choice. PestOff® “Ferret Paste” (with a
0.03% concentration of diphacinone) is the only registered toxin for ferrets in New
Zealand (Ragg and Clapperton 2004). Diphacinone has recently been incorporated into a
fish-paste bait (palatable to ferrets) for ferret control. This has been done using a bait
station dispersal system which excludes larger non-target species such as dogs and cats
(Ogilvie et al. 1996, in Spurr et al. 2005). According to Landcare Research (2005) baits
are most effective if laid in late summer, autumn and early winter.
While diphacinone is less potent than bromadiolone, brodifacoum or flocoumafen it may
have potential harmful effects on non-target species, including secondary poisoning
leading to death in carcass-feeding birds (eg: several owl species and perhaps the USA
golden eagle have been shown to be affected in this way) (Savarie et al. 1979, in Eason
and Wickstrom 1997). Bats have also been shown to be susceptible suggesting that short
and long-tailed bats in New Zealand may also be at risk of secondary poisoning (Eason
and Wickstrom 1997).

At sites where 1080 is used to poison a target species secondary poisoning and death may
occur in predatory animals such as ferrets, stoats and other mustelids as well as rats, feral
cats and domestic species such as cats and dogs (Hegdal et al. 1986, McIlroy and Gifford
1992, Alterio 1996 2000, Heyward and Norbury 1999, Murphy et al. 1999, in Eason and
Wickstrom 1997). This is due to the fact that the toxin may remain in sub-lethally
poisoned vertebrates for up to four days (Eason et al. 1994, in Eason and Wickstrom
1997).

Micro-encapsulated zinc phosphide (MEZP) is poisonous to ferrets and 40 mg of zinc
was found to be lethal within five hours of consumption of the dose (Clapperton and
Porter 2005). The authors found that capsules were rejected 50% of the time when
presented in food weighing (6 - 19 g) but accepted in smaller pieces of food (0.5 g – 1.1
g). Consideration as to whether chemical control is acceptably humane should always be
taken before employing MEZP or any other chemicals in a control project. When using
vertebrate pesticides, welfare benefits can accrue from ensuring that all individuals
exposed to the pesticides receive a lethal dose, and that the lethal dose kills as quickly
and humanely as possible (Warburton and Connor 2004).

7. Integrative Management

Integration of ferret control with monitoring for local bird species and detecting positive
changes in bird breeding success is a good way of re-enforcing the objectives of ferret
control projects and can be a positive way of involving the local community in wildlife
projects. A ferret control project on the Isle of Coll (United Kingdom) aims to protect
machair (a Scottish Gaelic word referring to the fertile grassland near the shore) birds,
including lapwing, redshank, snipe, dunlin, ringed plover, and corncrake (Projects
Approved April 04 Part 2 2004). Funding for the project is provided by LEADER+ (£6
120), Nadair (Heritage Lottery) (£7 710) and R Wainwright (£2,880) and totals £16,710.
Assessment of the success of ferret control will be achieved by researching the impact of
the control on ground-nesting bird success.

One of the methods of reducing the impacts of ferrets and other predators on threatened
birds in New Zealand has been to modify the habitat around bird breeding sites. For
example, the Department of Conservation has planted buffer zones of long grass around
yellow-eyed penguin coastal grassland breeding areas in Otago and removed willows
from braided riverbed habitat where stilts and dotterels nest in the MacKenzie Basin
farmland (Ragg and Clapperton 2004). Habitat modification lowered the rates of
predation in the braided riverbed habitat of the MacKenzie Basin but not the coastal
grassland habitat of Otago Peninsula (Ragg and Clapperton 2004). Habitat modification
is believed to have very limited applicability for farmland areas (Ragg and Clapperton
2004).

8. Research

Research is under way on alternative toxins and bait formulations for ferrets (Ragg and
Clapperton 2004).

9. Ethical Considerations

Ferrets are cute. Ferrets are often kept as pets. Many people are horrified at the thought of
killing these animals. This poses an ethical dilemma. Sometimes certain values must be
compromised in order to preserve other values such as the conservation of the
environment. Whatever ones‟ views on this issue, there is one thing everyone should be
agree about: if an animal is to be killed it should be done humanely and, if possible,
expertly. Some of the trapping methods discussed in the literature are probably far from
humane and more research needs to be conducted in this area. For example, kill traps
have been assessed against the specifications that target animals must be rendered
unconscious within three minutes, and the results indicate that most kill traps currently in
use fail the test (NAWAC 2000, in Warburton and Connor 2004). Any planned ferret
control project should endeavour to gain public support through educational means (eg:
informing the public about the negative impacts of ferrets on native bird life). They
should also be based around firm humane guidelines and legal methods of disposing of
the animals.

Legislation for pest control in New Zealand, Australia, Europe and the United Kingdom
is outlined in Littin and Mellor (2005); this document can be downloaded from:
https://www.oie.int/eng/publicat/rt/2402/PDF/littin767-782.pdf.

This following exert applying to New Zealand legislation is taken directly from Ragg and
Clapperton 2004 (Ferret Control Manual):

       “There is a saying that „the only good ferret is a dead ferret‟. While this may be
       true, they are not responsible for their introduction to New Zealand [or any other
       introduced region] and are only doing what comes naturally to them. Trapped
       ferrets are usually stressed, sometimes hurt and often don‟t respond in a way that
       endears themselves to us. But we still have an obligation to treat them with
       respect. A ferret or non-target species must be killed as quickly and humanely as
       possible. Animals must only be captured and killed in ways that fulfil legal
       obligations under the Animal Welfare Act 1999 (New Zealand). See
       www.maf.govt.nz/biosecurity/animal-welfare act to download a guide to the Animal
       Welfare Act.”

Furthermore, before any animal-research projects can proceed (eg: captive trials to
determine the toxicity of poisons, the efficacy of fertility control agents, and welfare
impacts of poisons and traps) in New Zealand they must receive approval from
institutional Animal Ethics Committees (AECs) (Warburton and Connor 2004). This is
usually done by assessing the ethical cost to the experimental animals (ie: pain and
suffering) in relation to the end benefits of the study (i.e. biodiversity conservation and
control of zoonoses) (Warburton and Connor 2004). However, it must be noted that this
process is often only achieved with vague benefits being provided (eg: to develop more
cost-effective protection of an endangered species), and weighed against equally vague
costs to welfare, as it is a difficult and subjective task to evaluate and quantify the costs
and benefits in these situations (Warburton and Connor 2004).

Further Information

The Department of Conservation (New Zealand) DOC Technical Series has a wealth of
information on mustelid control, which can be accessed at:
http://www.doc.govt.nz/templates/page.aspx?id=39160. In particular, King (1994) and King,
O'Donnell and Phillipson (1994) have prepared a comprehensive guide to the monitoring
and control of mustelids on conservation lands. This guide is in two parts (Part 1:
Planning and Assessing an Operation and Part 2: Field and Workshop Guide), which can
be accessed from the aforementioned website or by using the websites found in the
reference list below.

This comprehensive ferret control manual (Ragg and Clapperton 2004) discusses the
logistics of ferret control via tapping (including useful set up guidelines and safe ferret
disposal methods). It also includes references to other useful ferret control resources
(documents/websites/links): http://www.ahb.org.nz/NR/rdonlyres/D86FEEE4-FA9C-4F1D-
A6EC-6F519015D001/114/R80596FerretControlManual.pdf.

This Landcare Research site provides a detailed analysis of ferret control methods,
including trapping and chemical methods and reviews various management strategies:
http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/wildlifeecol/ferrets/ferretcontrolstrategies.asp.

This site on ferret control provides an overview of the ferret kill trapping method (with a
New Zealand focus): http://www.predatortraps.com/downloads/techniques_ferret_trap.doc.

The Department of Conservation “Toxin Manual” (Eason and Wickstrom 1997) provides
further information on the use and action of toxins including diphacinone. It can be
accessed from: http://www.doc.govt.nz/templates/page.aspx?id=39161.

For a discussion on the ethics of ferret control and animal welfare control please see
Littin and Mellor (2005) Strategic Animal Welfare Issues: Ethical and Animal Welfare
Issues Arising From the Killing of Wildlife for Disease Control and Environmental
Reasons, which can be accessed from: https://www.oie.int/eng/publicat/rt/2402/PDF/littin767-
782.pdf.
References

Barlow, N.D. and Norbury, G.L. 2001. A Simple Model for Ferret Population Dynamics in Semi-arid New
Zealand Habitats, Wildlife Research 28: 87-94.

Byrom, A.E. 2002. Dispersal and Survival of Juvenile Feral Ferrets Mustela furo in New Zealand, Journal
of Applied Ecology 39: 67-78.

Clapperton, B.K. 2001. Advances in New Zealand Mammalogy 1990-2000: Feral Ferret, Journal of the
Royal Society of New Zealand 31 (1): 185-203. [Accessed 18 March 2007, from:
www.rsnz.org/publish/jrsnz/2001/14.pdf]

Clapperton, B.K. and Porter, R.E.R. 2005. Efficacy of Micro-encapsulated Zinc Phosphide as a Poison for
Ferrets, Department of Conservation Science Internal Series 197. Department of Conservation:
Wellington. [Accessed 14 March 2007, from: http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/science-and-
technical/dsis197.pdf]

Eason, C.T and Wickstrom, M. 1997. Vertebrate Pesticide Toxicology Manual (Poisons): Information on
Poisons Used in New Zealand as Vertebrate Pesticides (2nd ed.), Department of Conservation Technical
Series 23. Department of Conservation: Wellington. [Accessed 18 March 2007, from:
http://www.doc.govt.nz/templates/page.aspx?id=39161]

Gillies, C. and Williams, D. Undated. Using Tracking Tunnels to Monitor Rodents and Mustelids.
Department of Conservation. Unpublished.

King, C.M. 1994. Monitoring and Control of Mustelids on Conservation Lands: Part 1: Planning and
Assessing an Operation, Department of Conservation Technical Series No. 3. Department of Conservation:
Wellington. [Accessed 18 March 2007, from: http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/science-and-
technical/docts03.pdf]

King, C.M., O'Donnell, C.F.J. and Phillipson, S.M. 1994. Monitoring and Control of Mustelids on
Conservation Lands: Part 2: Field and Workshop Guide, Department of Conservation Technical Series No.
3. Department of Conservation: Wellington. [Accessed 18 March 2007, from: http://publ.doc.govt.nz/dbtw-
wpd/exec/dbtwpcgi.exe?AC=GET_RECORD&XC=/dbtw-
wpd/exec/dbtwpcgi.exe&BU=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.doc.govt.nz%2Ftemplates%2Fsrpublicationsform.ht
m&TN=pubslive&SN=AUTO17094&SE=164&RN=2&MR=20&TR=0&TX=1000&ES=0&CS=1&XP=&
RF=scipubswebreport&EF=Basic+Record+Form&DF=Websitedisplay&RL=0&EL=1&DL=0&NP=3&ID
=&MF=searchbutton.ini&MQ=&TI=0&DT=&ST=0&IR=2887&NR=0&NB=0&SV=0&BG=0&FG=0000
00&QS=scipubswebquery]

Landcare Research. 2007. Ferret Control. [Accessed 18 March 2007, from:
http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/wildlifeecol/ferrets/ferretcontrolstrategies.asp]

Littin, K.E. and Mellor, D.J. 2005. Strategic Animal Welfare Issues: Ethical and Animal Welfare Issues
Arising From the Killing of Wildlife for Disease Control and Environmental Reasons, Rev. sci. tech. Off.
int. Epiz. 24 (2): 767-782. [Accessed 18 March 2007, from:
https://www.oie.int/eng/publicat/rt/2402/PDF/littin767-782.pdf]

Moore, N.P., Roy, S.S. and Helyar, A. 2003. Mink (Mustela vison) eradication to protect ground-nesting
birds in the Western Isles, Scotland, United Kingdom, New Zealand Journal of Zoology 30: 443-452.
[Accessed 12 April 2005, from: http://www.rsnz.org/publish/nzjz/2003/034.pdf]
Parkes, J. and Murphy, E. 2004. Risk Assessment of Stoat Control Methods for New Zealand, Science for
Conservation 237. Department of Conservation.

Ragg, J.R. and Clapperton, B.K. 2004. Ferret Control Manual. (Prepared for: Animal Health Board,
Wellington). [Accessed 18 March 2007, from: http://www.ahb.org.nz/NR/rdonlyres/D86FEEE4-FA9C-
4F1D-A6EC-6F519015D001/114/R80596FerretControlManual.pdf]

Spurr, E.B. 1999. Developing a Long-life Toxic Bait and Lures for Mustelids. In: Progress in Mammal
Pest Control on New Zealand Conservation Lands, Science for Conservation 127. 1999. Department of
Conservation: Wellington.

Spurr, E.B., Ogilvie, S.C., Morse, C.W. and Young, J.B. 2005. Development of a Toxic Bait for Control of
Ferrets (Mustela furo) in New Zealand, New Zealand Journal of Zoology 32: 127-136.

Warburton, B. and O‟Connor, C. 2004. Research on Vertebrate Pesticides and Traps: Do Wild Animals
Benefit? In: Research on Animals for Animal Benefit, Fourth World Congress, ATLA (Alternatives to
Laboratory Animals) 32 (Supplement 1): 229–234. [Accessed 15 March 2007, from:
http://www.worldcongress.net/2002/proceedings/B6%20Warburton.pdf]

West Highland European Leader Kist (WHELK). 2004. Project Manager Arran: Ferret Control on Isle of
Coll. [Accessed 14 March 2007, from: http://www.whelk.org.uk/Projects/coll%20ferrets.htm]

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Stats:
views:7
posted:7/30/2010
language:English
pages:8
Description: Management Strategies Ferret Mustela furo poisoning