Nanotechnology Environment, Health, and Safety
Shared by: fxw33739
Categories
Tags
nanotechnology research, health and safety, national nanotechnology initiative, environment health and safety, occupational safety and health, nanoscale materials, project on emerging nanotechnologies, safety research, environmental health and safety, implications of nanotechnology, carbon nanotubes, nanotechnology environment, ehs issues, health & safety, journal of nanoparticle research
-
Stats
- views:
- 159
- posted:
- 7/29/2010
- language:
- English
- pages:
- 19
Document Sample


Nanotechnology: Environment, Health,
and Safety
Clark A. Miller, PhD
Associate Director for Education and Outreach
Center for Nanotechnology in Society
Arizona State University
http://cns.asu.edu/index.htm
June 6, 2008
CNS-ASU research, education and outreach activities are supported by the
National Science Foundation under cooperative agreement #0531194.
Objectives
What is nanotechnology?
Why is nanotechnology so exciting?
What are emerging product areas?
Are there risks associated with nanotechnology?
What guidelines exist for nanotechnology EHS
protection?
Where can resources be found about nanotechnology
EHS?
2
What is nanotechnology?
Nanotechnology is defined as the ability to visualize, analyze, and
manipulate materials on molecular scales of approximately 0.1 to
100 nm.
By 2015, the National Science Foundation estimates that
nanotechnology will have a $1 trillion impact on the global economy
and will employ 2 million workers, 1 million of which may be in the
United States (Roco and Bainbridge 2001).
Estimates of the market for carbon nanotubes are $1-2 billion by
2015 (Thayer 2007).
Nanotechnology is a broad classification that includes a wide range
of applications across a wide range of technology platforms,
including scanning, tunneling, and atomic force microscopy, next
generation semiconductors, nanoparticles, nano-bio molecules, thin
film technologies, nano-sensors and other nano-devices, quantum
dots, quantum computing, and many, many more.
3
Scaling matter
4
What is nanotechnology?
5
Go Sun Devils!
6
Why nanotechnology?
Properties of materials change dramatically at nanoscales. For
example:
Color: Gold nanoparticles in suspension are red
Friction: Oils, on nanoscales, are made up of large molecules that
can obstruct motion of physical systems; frictional forces
dominate in many phycial systems
Domain: Light and electrons follow quantum rather than classical
dynamics
7
Nano Products
The Woodrow Wilson Project on Emerging
Nanotechnologies identifies over 600 existing
consumer products that incorporate nanotechnology
Vast majority involve nanoparticles: sunscreens,
paints, cleaners, coatings, protective sprays, clothing,
detergents, air purifiers, food, kitchen utensils, cooking
oil, food storage containers, cooking pans, baby
bottles, nutritional supplements, cosmetics, sports
equipment, filtration equipment, wood sealants, glass
sealants, “sandable” glue, etc.
Others are predominantly nanostructured electronics:
semiconductor chips, hard drives, etc.
8
Nanoparticle safety research:
highlights
EPA has concluded that ultrafine particulates, which are defined as less than 100nm,
are a known health hazard at existing NAAQS standards.
A growing body of research evidence suggests that exposure to engineered
nanoparticles can also lead to toxicological effects, especially when breathed in
through the lungs. Other exposure pathways have been less studied with mixed
results.
Few, if any, life cycle studies have been done on nano-based products to determine
whether exposures to nanoparticles can occur during production, use, or disposal of
products.
Disposal of molecular compounds (such as pharmaceutical drugs) is known to have
contaminated water supplies; whether disposal of household products with
nanoparticles will behave similarly is not known, nor is the environmental or health
impact.
Toxicology data on macro-scale materials may or may not be relevant to
understanding the toxicology of nano-scale materials. Properties change.
In general, considerable uncertainties exist in our current understanding of
environmental and health consequences of nanoparticles and other nanotechnologies.
But, there are good reasons to believe that some forms of toxicity will emerge.
My view is that we should be careful and assume an elevated safety posture.
9
Nanoparticle safety research: a few
examples
Ultrafine particulate matter, which EPA defines as
particulates less than 100nm in size, is a known health
hazard from considerable research sponsored by EPA and
other government agencies.
http://www.epa.gov/NHEERL/research/pm/index.html
Ultrafine particles are estimated to cause 100,000 deaths per year
in the US (Schwartz et al. 2002)
“The comparability of engineered NPs to UFPs suggests that the
human health effects are likely to be similar. Therefore, it is
prudent to elucidate their toxicologic effect to minimize
occupational and environmental exposure.” (Gwynn and Vallyathan
2006)
Elder et al (2006) observe that the carbon nanoparticles enter the
brain by moving down the brain cells that pick up odours and
transmit signals to the olfactory bulb.
10
Nanoparticle safety research: a few
examples
Studies have shown that fullerene (C60) molecules in solution cause
peroxidation of lipids in the brains of aquatic species and have significant
detrimental effects on the development and reproduction of aquatic species
(Oberdorster 2004; Oberdorster et al. 2006)
http://www.ehponline.org/members/2004/7
021/7021.html
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.11.
008
11
Nanoparticle safety research: a few
examples
Recent studies on mice have identified that long carbon nanotubes
that look like asbestos fibers cause similar pathological precursors to
lung cancer as asbestos (Poland et al. 2008;
http://www.nanotechproject.org/news/archive/mwcnt/;
http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nnano.2008.111.html
)
“[E]xposing the mesothelial lining of the body cavity of mice, as a
surrogate for the mesothelial lining of the chest cavity, to long
multiwalled carbon nanotubes results in asbestos-like, length-
dependent, pathogenic behaviour. This includes inflammation and
the formation of lesions known as granulomas. This is of
considerable importance, because research and business
communities continue to invest heavily in carbon nanotubes for a
wide range of products5 under the assumption that they are no more
hazardous than graphite. Our results suggest the need for further
research and great caution before introducing such products into the
market if long-term harm is to be avoided.”
12
Nanosafety guidelines
From NIOSH report “Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology” (2006).
Many uncertainties exist regarding occupational risks from
engineered nanotechnologies
Material safety data sheets for bulk materials may not be accurate
for the same material in the form of nanoparticles
“Current scientific evidence indicates that nanoparticles may be
more biologically reactive than larger particles of similar chemical
composition and thus may pose a greater health risk when inhaled.”
Particle shape and surface area may be more important than mass
in determining toxicity
Quantum dots have been shown to penetrate the skin; ingestion can
also be an exposure route
Other safety concerns can include fire and explosion (especially for
nanoparticle powders) and catalytic reaction
A range of possible workshop exposure pathways should be
investigated and mitigated using standard chemical and material
safety practices (gloves, masks, hoods, HEPA filters, etc.)
13
Nanosafety guidelines
From NIOSH report “Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology” (2006).
“Until further information on the possible health risks and extent of
occupational exposure to nanomaterials becomes available, interim
precautionary measures should be developed and implemented.”
“In the absence of specific exposure limits or guidelines for engineered
nanoparticles, exposure data gathered from the use of respirable samplers
[NIOSH 1994b] can be used to determine the need for engineering controls
or work practices and for routine exposure monitoring of processes and job
tasks.”
“For most processes and job tasks, the control of airborne exposure to
nanoparticles can most likely be accomplished using a wide variety of
engineering control techniques similar to those used in reducing exposures
to general aerosols.”
“Current knowledge indicates that a well-designed exhaust ventilation
system with a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter should effectively
remove nanoparticles.”
“Every workplace dealing with nanoparticles, engineered nanomaterials, or
other aspects of nanotechnology should consider the need for an
occupational health surveillance program.”
14
Resources for Nano Risk Information
NIOSH Nanotechnology Information
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/nanotech/
EPA Nanotechnology Information
http://www.epa.gov/oppt/nano/
FDA Nanotechnology Information
http://www.fda.gov/nanotechnology/
Woodrow Wilson Institute Project on Emerging
Nanotechnologies http://www.nanotechproject.org/
UW Madison Nano Risk Resources
http://www.nsec.wisc.edu/NanoRisks/NS--NanoRisks.php
UK Safe Nano Project http://www.safenano.org/
ICON http://icon.rice.edu/resources.cfm
15
Measurement
You can collect nanoparticles with filters, but you
probably can’t detect them.
Condensation particle counters ($6K - $20K) size range
2 to 1000nm
Other technologies such as low pressure impactors and
SMPS relatively expensive
Combustion aerosols
16
Controls
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/nanotech/
Control Banding
Ad Hoc exposure limits
Pharmaceutical Model
17
Respiratory Protection
Expect conventional technology to be effective
Watch for “dirty jobs” (cleaning reactors and equipment)
18
ASU EH&S Planning
Communicate concerns to Research Community
Sponsor seminars
Modify CHP with nano guidance
Educate staff to better support labs
19
Related docs
Get documents about "