professional documents
home
Profile
Upload
docsters
Blogs
Upload
user photo
Tim Stanley
Programmer
Justia
Murray v. Christenson et al Doc. 31 Case 3:04-cv-05758-FDB Document 31 Filed 11/03/2005 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 v. DAVE CHRISTENSON, et al., Defendants. MARK T. MURRAY, Plaintiff, Case No. C04-5758FDB ORDER DIRECTING DOCUMENTS BE SENT TO PLAINTIFF AND SETTING TIME FOR OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA On February 9, 2005, [Dkt. # 25] Plaintiff advised the court of what his address would be when he was released, but Plaintiff did not advise when he would be released. The notice was mailed from the Grays Harbor Correctional Facility, P. O. Box 630, Montesano, WA 98563. On April 26, 2005, [Dkt. # 26] The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff at 121 Barcelona Lane, Montesano, WA 98563, the address given in the notice at Dkt. # 25. On May 31, 2005, [Dkt. # 27] the Court adopted the Report and Recommendation. On November 1, 2005, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Relief from Judgment, citing the number of moves that he has been compelled to make and the fact that his mail was not forwarded.. He shows his address to be P. O. Box 630, Montesano, WA 98563, which is apparently the Grays Harbor Correctional Facility. ORDER - 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:04-cv-05758-FDB Document 31 Filed 11/03/2005 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 While the Plaintiff is responsible to keep the court advised of his current mailing address, under the circumstances presented, Plaintiff will be given the documents he needs to respond to as well as time to respond to the Report and Recommendation. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Clerk shall send to Plaintiff at the Grays Harbor Correctional Facility, P. O. Box 630, Montesano, WA 98563 copies of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 23] and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 26]; 2. Plaintiff shall respond to the Report and Recommendation by no later than December 30, 2005. 3. The Court will enter an appropriate order following Plaintiff’s response. DATED this 3rd day of November, 2005. A FRANKLIN D. BURGESS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER - 2
flag this doc
10
0
not rated
0
4/14/2008
English
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 81

justia 4/16/2008 | 424 | 3 | 0 | legal
Preview

Taylor et al v. Acxiom Corporation et al - 62

justia 4/16/2008 | 325 | 3 | 0 | legal
Preview

Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al v. RDR Books et al - 73

justia 4/16/2008 | 313 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Stiener et al v. Apple, Inc. et al - 73

justia 4/16/2008 | 498 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Trujillo v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al - 86

justia 4/16/2008 | 589 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Ticketmaster LLC v. RMG Technologies Inc et al - 105

justia 4/16/2008 | 290 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al - 51

justia 4/16/2008 | 337 | 1 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 78

justia 4/16/2008 | 289 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 79

justia 4/16/2008 | 307 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 75

justia 4/16/2008 | 382 | 0 | 0 | legal
 
review this doc