The Balanced Scorecard A Framework for Accountability
Shared by: vow85608
Categories
Tags
balanced scorecard, the balanced scorecard, the organization, performance measures, performance management, scorecard system, strategic objectives, business strategy, management system, strategy implementation, strategy execution, how to, business processes, balanced scorecard approach, measurement system
-
Stats
- views:
- 14
- posted:
- 7/29/2010
- language:
- English
- pages:
- 25
Document Sample


The Balanced Scorecard: A
Framework for Accountability
Presenters:
Maureen Pettitt, Skagit Valley College, WA
Doug Whittaker, Washington State Board for
Community and Technical Colleges
“Colleges and universities are moving
into a period when they will be expected
to provide not only data on the
attainment of defined outcomes…but
also evidence that results have been
attained at a reasonable cost. [They]
will have to specify their aims, stand
ready to justify activities, demonstrate
their contribution to objectives, and
defend the cost of the enterprise.”
Berdahl & O‟Connell (1999). American Higher
Education in the Twenty-First Century.
External Accountability
Accountability performance indicators
are developed for external audiences
with limited areas of interest, resulting in
measures that are “incomplete and one-
dimensional views of performance.”
Desired improvements are unlikely to
occur “until performance measures are
linked to the drivers of institutional
effectiveness in a meaningful way.”
State Performance Measures
Performance Measures Number of States
Graduation rates 32
Transfer rates 25
Faculty workload/productivity 24
Follow-up satisfaction studies 23
External/sponsored research funds 23
Remediation activities/effectiveness 21
Pass rates 21
Degrees awarded 20
Placement data on graduates 19
Admission stds & measures 18
Total student credit hours 18
Number & % of accredited programs 13
http://www.acct.org/policy/Accountability_Report.htm
Internal Assessment
To be useful internally, performance
indicators must be tied to institutional
values, goals, and objectives…
…and the objectives must be translated
into specific research problems that can
be studied...and around which
strategies for improvement can be
developed.
Balanced Scorecard
After publishing
several well-
received articles
in HBR, Harvard
professors Robert
Kaplan and David
Norton released
their book in 1996
Definition
The Balanced Scorecard is a
multidimensional framework that
provides an „enterprise‟ view of the
organization‟s overall performance
by integrating financial measures
with other key performance
indicators.
“Think of the balanced
scorecard as the
dials and indicators in
an airplane cockpit.
For the complex task
of navigating and
flying an airplane,
pilots need detailed
information about
many aspects of the
flight...
They need information about fuel,
airspeed, altitude, bearing, destination
and other indicators that summarize the
current and predicated environment.
Reliance on one instrument can be
fatal.
Similarly, the complexity of managing
an organization today requires that
managers be able to view performance
in several areas simultaneously.”
Kaplan and Norton, 1992
Balancing Perspectives
Too often bad strategic decisions are
made in an effort to increase the
“bottom line” at the expense of other
institutional goals. The BSC suggests
that financial performance should not be
viewed as the focus, but as the natural
outcome of balancing other important
goals.
Four Strategic Issues
Customer
Internal business
process
Financial
Innovation and
learning
Customer Perspective
“How do – responsiveness,
customers timeliness
see us?” – product/service
quality and cost
– meet client needs
Internal Business Process
Perspective
“At what must – accurate and
we excel?” timely delivery of
services
– effective systems
and processes
– environmental
sustainability
Financial Perspective
“How do we look – budgets
to our key – revenue
stakeholders?” – capital
expenditures
– debt to asset
ratio
Innovation and Learning
Perspective
“Can we – employee skills and
continue to training
improve and – use of technology
create value?” – encouragement of
innovation
– continuous
improvement
Ultimate Balancing Act
The ultimate balancing
act in any organization is
the one whereby the
needs and requirements
of multiple stakeholders
are reconciled and
integrated.
Financial Perspective
Goals Measures
Customer Perspective Internal Business
Goals Measures Perspective
Vision
Goals Measures
Innovation and
Learning Perspective
Goals Measures
Examples
Ohio State University
USC Rossier School of Education
Exercises
Southwest University
Pacific Northwest College
Strategic Planning
An effective scorecard will identify a set
of strategic questions, objectives, and
measures that address the issue of
adding value--and doing so at a rate
that is better than the competition. This
is the essence of strategy.
Strategic Planning (con’t)
A balanced set of
indicators can
systematically
stimulate better
understandings and
deeper insights that
can form the basis
for strategy.
Four Key Processes
Feedback Translating
and the vision
learning
Business
planning
Communicating
and linking
Four Key Processes
Translating the vision helps managers
build a consensus around the
institution‟s strategy and express it in
terms that guide action
Communicating and linking lets
managers communicate their strategy
institution-wide, and link it to unit and
individual goals
Four Key Processes (con’t)
Business planning enables the
institution to integrate its business and
financial plans
Feedback and learning give institutions
the capacity for strategic learning, which
consists of gathering feedback, testing
the hypotheses on which strategy was
based, and making adjustments
Related docs
Get documents about "