ROBINSON v. CROSBY - 7

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
37
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/14/2008
language:
pages:
0
ROBINSON v. CROSBY Doc. 7 Case 4:05-cv-00376-MP-AK Document 7 Filed 10/21/2005 Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION JAMES H. ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. JAMES V. CROSBY, Respondent. ___________________________/ ORDER This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by James H. Robinson. By separate order, the Court granted Petitioner leave to proceed IFP. The Court has reviewed the petition, and Respondent will be required to file an answer or other pleading within the time set by this order. See § 2254 Rules 4 and 5. If an answer is filed, it shall be in compliance with § 2254 Rule 5. If a response is filed which raises a procedural argument not going to the merits, Respondent may await a ruling on that defense before filing an answer on the merits. Alternatively, Respondent may proceed directly to the merits without necessarily waiving the exhaustion requirement. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2254(b)(2) and 2254(b)(3). Petitioner may file a response to Respondent’s arguments within the time set by this order, but he is not required to do so. Upon receipt of the Respondent’s arguments and Petitioner’s response (if any), the court will review the file to determine whether an evidentiary hearing is required. An evidentiary hearing will not be required unless consideration of disputed CASE NO. 4:05-cv-00376-MP-AK Dockets.Justia.com Case 4:05-cv-00376-MP-AK Document 7 Filed 10/21/2005 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2 evidence outside the state court record appears necessary to the court. If it is determined that an evidentiary hearing is not required, the court will dispose of the petition as justice requires pursuant to § 2254 Rule 8(a). Accordingly, it is ORDERED: That the clerk shall furnish by certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, Document 1, and this order to Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida; Respondent shall file an answer or other pleading on or before December 21, 2005; Petitioner shall have until January 23, 2005, to file a response, if desired. DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2005. s/ A. KORNBLUM ALLAN KORNBLUM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case No: 4:05-cv-00376-MP-AK

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
Robinson v Crosby (200410490ord)
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
HILL v. CROSBY et al - 7
Views: 45  |  Downloads: 0
RUTHERFORD v. CROSBY ET AL - 10
Views: 29  |  Downloads: 0
HILL v. CROSBY et al - 39
Views: 35  |  Downloads: 0
Wilson v. Robinson - 7
Views: 43  |  Downloads: 0
Bing_Crosby
Views: 116  |  Downloads: 0
Turner v Crosby (200214941)
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Sartain v. Robinson et al - 7
Views: 30  |  Downloads: 0
Robinson v. Menu Foods - 7
Views: 12  |  Downloads: 0
Robinson v. Thorpe et al - 7
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Robinson v. Scribner - 7
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
Robinson v. South Carolina, State of - 7
Views: 38  |  Downloads: 0