Docstoc

obama fake birth certificate

Document Sample
obama fake birth certificate Powered By Docstoc
					Obama Citizenship story update 12/14/08:
Summary of new selected links -
Dec. 15: Electoral College meets / awaiting SCOTUS decision on "cert"
for Connecticut case
The Electors in all 50 States and Washington D.C. meet on Monday, December 15 to officially
vote for U.S. president.

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) on Monday, December 8, 2008, already denied certiorari, refusing
to hear oral arguments on the New Jersey case (Leo C. Donofrio v. New Jersey Secretary of State Nina Mitchell Wells)
filed by attorney Leo C. Donofrio ( http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com and http://grou.ps/zapem/home )

Leo C. Donofrio, Applicant v. Nina Mitchell Wells, New Jersey Secretary of State
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a407.htm

A second case before the SCOTUS, this time from Connecticut (Cort Wrotnowski v. Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut
Secretary of State), was scheduled for a conference of US Supreme Court justices on Friday, December 12, 2008
to determine whether to take (grant certiorari, hear oral arguments) this Connecticut case
(http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/). A decision on whether to grant certiorari is expected this week.

Cort Wrotnowski v. Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a469.htm


See also earlier (11/30/08, 12/4/08, 12/7/08, 12/8/08, 12/9/08) summary compilations of news regarding the
Obama Citizenship story:

Obama Citizenship story update 12/9/08: Summary of new selected links
- WND national campaign to contact 538 Electors of 50 States/DC
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/2008-12-09-ObamaCitizenshipstory.doc

Obama Citizenship story update 12/8/08: Summary of new selected links
- SCOTUS refuses to hear New Jersey Donofrio case
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/2008-12-08-ObamaCitizenshipstory.doc

Obama Citizenship story update 12/7/08: Summary of new selected links
- articles/National Press Club event Dec. 8
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/2008-12-07-ObamaCitizenshipstory.doc

Obama Citizenship story update 12/4/08: Summary of new selected links - articles/video/ads in CT
http://lefemineforlife.blogspot.com/2008/12/obama-citizenship-story-update-12408.html

Obama Citizenship story: Summary of selected links - articles/videos/ad in WT/petition
http://lefemineforlife.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-citizenship-story-summary-of.html
(compiled November 30, 2008)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

As we await the Supreme Court's decision on whether to grant certiorari in the Connecticut Wrotnowski case as early as
Monday, December 15, 2008, it appears the CFR-dominated Corporate Big Media are continuing their silence on radio
and televison news about the several ongoing court challenges to the constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to be
inaugurated on January 20, 2009. As you listen to the radio and TV network news, notice some of the foolish distractions
that pass for "news" that they DO have time for in their broadcasts, but NOT for a potential looming constitutional crisis.
It is by design.

-- As New World Order kingpin David Rockefeller said to the Bilderberg group on June 5, 1991 meeting in Germany:
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications
whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It
would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity
during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.
The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-
determination practiced in past centuries."
www.jeremiahproject.com/newworldorder/nworder04.html
www.crossroad.to/Quotes/globalism/rockefeller.htm
 Has anyone heard anything on air, either radio or television from the ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX (fake and biased), or
PBS arms of the CFR-dominated Corporate Big Media about the Connecticut case awaiting a SCOTUS
decision on certiorari ? In addition, there are other legal challenges, notably the Pennsylvania Berg case, and
the California Keyes case, still in the legal pipeline. Take note of the lack of coverage by the Establishment Media
on these other ongoing cases, not only today, but also in the days/weeks ahead. Notice how the CFR-controlled
media manipulator propagandists of public thought and attention in ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX and PBS continue
to non-report, or under-report these critical matters !

A word to the wise, be wary of what you hear from CFR-member Brian Williams (NBC anchor-propagandist); from
retiring interim NBC's "Meet the Press" host CFR Director Tom Brokaw (and former NBC anchor-propagandist), from
CFR-member Katie Couric (CBS anchor-propagandist), from CFR-member, former CFR Director Diane Sawyer (ABC
News-propagandist), from CFR-member Barbara Walters (ABC News-propagandist), from FOX News (overseen by
CFR-member Rupert Murdoch, Newscorp. CEO), or from the PBS Newshour ("CFR Evening News") crew, including
CFR-member Jim Lehrer, CFR-member Judy Woodruff, or CFR-member Margaret Warner, or any of the other CFR
mouthpieces in the broadcast (radio/televsion), print, or internet media. These names are only the "tip of the
iceberg" of CFR members occupying influential positions in the nation's most influential media - print
(newspaper and magazine), and television.

The CFR controls American media
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPlvdSQ6cAM
Video (4:32) Views: 116,440

Do your own research from independent and varied sources, especially on the internet (blogs, e-mail).
Check out plaintiff Phil Berg's (Pennsylvania case) website (www.ObamaCrimes.com) and Leo Donofrio's
blogsite (http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com). Links to reports from various media are provided below,
mainly from Dec. 8 - Dec. 13, and one good comprehensive article from November 24, 2008.


God says, "As for My people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O My people, they
which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:12

and, "For the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed." Isaiah 9:16

To paraphrase this nation's Founding Fathers, Only a Virtuous People is Capable of Liberty; Only a Moral People is
Capable of Freedom; Only a People which can Govern Themselves as Individuals, can practice Self-Government
corporately. To apply the Scriptures above, America has gotten wicked rulers because we ourselves as a People are
wicked: a nation that practices, tolerates, enshrines, advertises, supports financially both privately and publicly, and
protects in law: child-murder-by-abortion, fornication, adultery, and sodomy, etc.
Can such a nation survive ? NO.

America's only hope is Repentance, beginning with those who profess to be Christians.

Repent Church (2 Chronicles 7:14). Repent America (Psalm 9:17, Proverb 14:34).

Steve Lefemine
December 14, 2008
_____________________________________________________________________________

Targeting the Electoral College
Posted: December 10, 2008
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=83147
[excerpts, emphasis added]

Normally, the electors perform their duties like robots. Those pledged to the Democrat candidate vote for him. Those
pledged to the Republican candidate vote for him.

On Monday, 538 electors are scheduled to convene throughout the 50 states to cast their ballots for one of
two candidates – John McCain and Barack Obama. Yet, there is a more fundamental issue at stake this year than
ever before – and electors should each take their constitutional responsibility seriously to raise it.

Is the man who won the majority of popular votes Nov. 4, Barack Obama, eligible to be president under
Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution?
If there is any doubt, electors have a sworn duty to find out. And, no matter what you hear from my colleagues in
the press, elected officials who chose not to investigate this matter and not to insist that safeguards and checks were
in place on a matter so urgent and fundamental, there is doubt – grave doubt.

[continued]
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL
Thousands advise electors to check eligibility
But 1 who teaches 'Marxist theory' ridicules concerns
Posted: December 13, 2008
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=83458
[excerpts, emphasis added]

If documents someday prove Barack Obama is not eligible to be president under the U.S. Constitution, none
of the 538 Electoral College members who vote him into office Monday will be able to claim ignorance.

That's after 3,653 citizens had enough concern over the allegations, they participated in a WND effort to
deliver letters to every elector, urging them to investigate.

The latest letters were sent FedEx to all 538 members of the Electoral College.

[continued]
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

VIDEONETDAILY
Electors challenged to investigate birth dispute
'Only reasonable explanation' is he wasn't born in the U.S.
Posted: December 11, 2008
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=83346
[excerpt, emphasis added]

An activist organization has posted a video on YouTube challenging members of the Electoral College to
investigate the dispute over Barack Obama's birth certificate and eligibility for office.

The U.S. Constitution requires that the president be a "natural born" citizen, but the organization, Democratic-Disaster.com,
says instead of providing the documentation, Obama has hired three law firms to make certain
the public does not have access to it.

That's where the electors come in, according to the organization. The group says they have the "moral and
constitutional obligation" to investigate and be assured of Obama's eligibility.

The video is at the link, and also can be viewed here:

A Message to Our Electors
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX7uuhHXs-0
(4:39)
Views: 3,813
Important message for our electors. For more information, please visit www.democratic-disaster.com.

More than a dozen cases have been brought over Obama's eligibility already, many of which have been
dismissed summarily. However, three have reached the U.S. Supreme Court, and others remain in that pipeline.
The court has rejected one, is debating a motion in a second and has a conference still scheduled on the third.

[continued]
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL
Status report: The eligibility issue
Several cases still challenge whether senator can become president
Posted: December 13, 2008
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=83462
[excerpts, emphasis added]
More than a dozen lawsuits have been filed over Barack Obama's eligibility to assume the office of the
president, many have been dismissed, while others remain pending, including a case being considered by
the U.S. Supreme Court.

The cases have, in various ways, alleged Obama does not meet the "natural-born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution,
Article 2, Section 1, which reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time
of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

A partial listing and status update for several of the cases surrounding Obama's eligibility to serve as president is below:

-- Philip J. Berg, a Pennsylvania Democrat, demanded that the courts verify Obama's original birth certificate and other
  documents proving his American citizenship. Berg's latest appeal, requesting an injunction to stop the Electoral College
  from selecting the 44th president, was denied by Justice Souter of the U.S. Supreme Court.

-- Leo Donofrio of New Jersey filed a lawsuit claiming Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president.
  His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court but denied a full hearing.

-- Cort Wrotnowski filed suit against Connecticut's secretary of state, making a similar argument to Donofrio. His case is
  currently being considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court, with a decision on whether or not to bring it for
  a full hearing expected next week.

-- Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes headlines a list of people filing a suit in California that asks the secretary of
 state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama
 verifies his eligibility to hold the office. The case is pending, and lawyers are seeking the public's support.

-- Chicago attorney Andy Martin sought legal action requiring Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle to release Obama's vital
  record. The case was dismissed by Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe.

-- Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan sought a temporary restraining order to stop the Electoral College vote in North Carolina until
  Barack Obama's eligibility could be confirmed, alleging doubt about Obama's citizenship. His case was denied.

-- In Ohio, David M. Neal sued to force the secretary of state to request documents from the Federal Elections Commission,
  the Democratic National Committee, the Ohio Democratic Party and Obama to show the presidential candidate was born in
  Hawaii. The case was denied.

-- In Washington state, Steven Marquis sued the secretary of state seeking a determination on Obama's citizenship. The
  case was denied.

-- In Georgia, Rev. Tom Terry asked the state Supreme Court to authenticate Obama's birth certificate. His request for an
  injuction against Georgia's secretary of state was denied by Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter.

Despite numerous setbacks in the courts and several conflicting statements on who has standing to determine a candidate's
eligibility to be elected president, the challenges continue.

Private investigator Douglas Hagmann of HomelandSecurityUS.com reported earlier this week that he found 13 cases
challenging Obama's eligibility still active or semi-active.

[continued]
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Press Release: U.S. Supreme Court asked to issue an injunction
www.obamacrimes.com/attachments/072_ObamaPressRelease12082008.pdf
U. S. SUPREME COURT ASKED TO ISSUE AN INJUNCTION TO STAY ELECTORIAL VOTES ON DECEMBER 15, 2008
UNTIL OBAMA PROVES HE IS “QUALIFIED” TO BE PRESIDENT
Monday, 08 December 2008
[excerpt, emphasis added]

(Washington, DC – 12/08/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging
Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States today filed with the U.S. Supreme Court
an Application for an Injunction to Stay the Electoral Votes on December 15, 2008 and prohibit V.P. Richard B. Cheney, the
House of Representatives and the Senate counting any votes for Obama until Obama Proves he is “Qualified” to be President.

[continued]
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL
Supremes turn down request to stop Electoral vote
But Friday, high court will consider another case in flood of eligibility challenges
Posted: December 11, 2008
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=83299
[excerpt, emphasis added]

The U.S. Supreme Court has turned aside a request to stop the Electoral College from selecting the 44th president,
in a vote scheduled for Monday, until Barack Obama documents his eligibility for the office under the Constitution's
requirement that presidents must be "natural born" citizens.

The action came in a case brought to the high court by Philip J. Berg, who alleges Obama is ineligible to be president.

Berg had asked the court for an injunction the stay the Electoral College votes and prohibit Vice President Dick Cheney,
the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate from counting any votes until that demanded proof arrives.

The injunction was sought while Berg awaits the court's determination on whether it will hear his writ of certiorari
requesting review of a dismissal of his case in U.S. District Court in eastern Pennsylvania.




In a column in Tulsa Today, several other legal challenges to Obama were listed. Besides the Donofrio, Berg
and Wrotnowski cases, they include:

-- A lawsuit by Chicago attorney Andy Martin in Hawaii seeking release of Obama's vital statistics record.

-- A case brought by the United States Justice Foundation in California on behalf of Alan Keyes,
 seeking to prevent California electors from voting for Obama until his eligibility is authenticated.

-- A suit was filed in North Carolina by Lt. Col Donald Sullivan, alleging doubt about Obama's citizenship.

-- In Ohio, David M. Neal sued to force the secretary of state to document Obama's birthplace.

-- In Washington state, Steven Marquis sued seeking a determination on Obama's citizenship.

-- In Georgia, Tom Terry asked the state Supreme Court to authenticate Obama's birth certificate.
[continued]
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

National Press Club Conference, Monday, December 8, 2008
Washington, D.C.
www.obamacrimes.com
Video
Bob Schulz of WeThePeopleFoundation.org
Talk about "shock and awe" this is it.

Video of the We the People news conference at The National Press Club,
on Obama's eligibility to be president. "Largest hoax perpetrated upon
the citizens of the United States in over 200 years. We know nothing
about Obama. He will not admit where he is from. The Hawaii birth
certificate is bogus. He was born in Kenya. His real name today would
be Barry Soetoro."

"We The People" Obama Citizenship Challenge - National Press Club, DC Dec. 8, 2008
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6771521759788800576&hl=en

[continued]
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Keyes' lawyers invite public to 'join the fight'
High-profile eligibility lawsuit may succeed where others have failed
Posted: December 09, 2008
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=83161
[excerpts, emphasis added]

A California public interest legal group has taken on a high-profile battle that already has at least three entire law firms
lining up on the other side. But the group has promised to fight until a resolution is reached in the dispute over Barack
Obama's eligibility to be president.

The legal action by the United States Justice Foundation seeks to stop the state's Electoral College voters, who
already have been served with formal notices, from voting for Obama unless and until documentation proving his
eligibility to occupy the Oval Office has been provided.

"For the sake of our Constitution and our republic, the issue MUST be resolved," the legal advocacy group says
in a new campaign seeking support for its work.

To explain the implications of not resolving the eligibility question before Inauguration Day, USJF gives several
possible examples: "If President Obama issues an executive order to rescind the Mexico City Policy and
allows the tax dollars of Americans to fund organizations that promote abortions overseas, the door to
question the legitimacy of that executive order remains open."

Thus, contends USJF in its lawsuit: "Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible
for the office of president of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, petitioners,
as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that an usurper will be sitting as the president of the
United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal."

"In other words, as long as this case is in the courts, a cloud hangs over Sen. Obama's head. For the sake of our
Constitution and our Republic, the issue MUST be resolved!" the legal group said.

[continued]
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Great Birth Certificate Scandal/Cover-Up of ‘08
Monday, 24 November 2008
www.tulsatoday.com/newsdesk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1799&Itemid=2
[excerpts, emphasis added, excellent comprehensive summary article on the issue]

Numerous activist groups have undertaken letter-writing campaigns to the Supreme Court Justices, members
of the Electoral College, and elected officials, as well as sending urgent appeals to the White House and the
Department of Justice.

Websites like Citizens for the United States Constitution, We The People, PeoplesPassion, America Must Know,
and Faith2Action have sprung up in passionate defense of our Constitution’s integrity. The last of these has even
posted the names and addresses of Electoral College members from each state, as well as an ad in The Washington Times.

Dozens of petitions, like this one, have been circulated.
And dozens of mostly-conservative writers (including Devy Kidd and Miichelle Malkin), bloggers and journalists have
written about his strange case and potential Constitutional crisis, as I have in a series of articles – here and here and
here and here.

Coverage of the above by the media: Zero.

A DEAFENING SILENCE

It is no mystery that the leftist media have refused to mention this potentially looming Constitutional crisis in virtually
all of their print and electronic coverage. Having shilled for Obama for the past two years – dismissing his longtime
radical associations, obfuscating his radical voting record, and taking a pass at their jobs of vetting a presidential
candidate – their failure to cover the most explosive story of the 2008 campaign speaks volumes about collusion
of the highest order.

Then there are the late-night comics, as well as snarky “humorists” like Bill Maher and Jon Stewart, who take pride in
being irreverent and “outing” both people and subjects that others avoid. Not a word.

But what about the failure of the powerful conservative media – how to explain their total blackout of this story?
Let’s look at their reactions:

Fox News: Total Silence. Did the healthy shares that Saudi Arabia bought of Fox influence the network’s non-coverage
of this story? After all, it’s no secret which candidate the Saudis endorsed! We know that TV shows, including Fox, are
on a seven-second delay, the better to bleep out offensive or inappropriate material. Doesn’t it strike Fox viewers as
strange that not one of their outspoken guests, even once, mentioned this story? Who warned them not to?

Rush Limbaugh: Total Silence. Why has the Excellence-in-Broadcasting’s “Dr. of Democracy” – the man who eats
sacred cows for breakfast – not touched this story?

Mark Levin: Total Silence. Why has this popular radio host, commonly known as “the Great One,” [sic - CCL Note:
this is blasphemous] abandoned his well-deserved reputation as a Constitutional scholar to studiously not address
this Constitutional issue?

Laura Ingraham: Total Silence. Here is another radio powerhouse and former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas
taking pains not to mention this case…not a word!

Bill O’Reilly: Total Silence. Yes, the guy who claims he’s “just looking out for the folks”…voiceless!

Sean Hannity: Total Silence. The iconic radio and TV host who tackles every controversial subject under the sun…
missing in action!

[continued]

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

2006 Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Membership Roster
www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/CFRMembers.html

2007-2008 Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Membership Roster
(including Current and Historical Rosters of Directors and Officers)
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/CFRMembershipRoster200708.pdf

See a concise overview article about the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) on the internet at:
"The Definition of Tyranny," The New American (May 15, 1995), by John F. McManus
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/CFR-TNAart.doc
"Formed in 1921 by Edward Mandell House, President Woodrow Wilson's right-hand man,
the CFR's purpose has been undeniably clear from the start: to submerge our nation into
a socialist, one-world government."

    "Never forget that the CFR was formed to bring about socialism and world government.
Its increasing domination over America's affairs amounts to a conspiracy the grip of which must
be broken by an informed and alarmed American citizenry. If CFR influence over our federal
government isn't soon broken, America will be reduced to a mere province in a socialistic
world government where freedom has disappeared and national sovereignty is but a dim memory.
And James Madison's worst fear -- tyranny reigning in this land -- will become a reality. The time to
 expose the CFR and its grip on this land is now."
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/CFR-TNAart.doc
TWO-SIDED McCAIN FLYER FOR PRINT-OUT AND DISTRIBUTION
Side 2 - The Definition of Tyranny (CFR)
        The New American - May 15, 1995
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/McCainflyerside2.pdf


ENDGAME: Blueprint For Global Enslavement
Video (2hrs, 19 min)
The New World Order - including CFR, NAU, eugenics, forced global population reduction, Georgia Guidestones
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261
[ Warning: over the course of the 2+ hrs, there are some cases of profanity ]

Sovereignty and globalisation
www.cfr.org/publication/9903/sovereignty_and_globalisation.html
Richard N. Haass, President, Council on Foreign Relations
February 17, 2006

_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________

AMERICA - A NATION UNDER DIVINE JUDGMENT.
Psalm 33:12; Proverb 14:34; Psalm 9:17; 2 Kings 24:1-4; Jeremiah 19:3-5; Psalm 106:37-42

"America repent" (music video)
"Contemporary Christian Artist: Tim Juillet"
www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvu6hHLSpzk


"The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God."
Psalm 9:17, KJB

"But judgment shall return unto righteousness: and all the upright in heart shall follow it."

Psalm 94:15, KJB


Biblical "Separation" for a Nation
"Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness?
and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that
believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living
God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord,..." 2 Corinthians 6:14-17a (KJB)
THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE - IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have
connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the
Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should
declare the causes which impel them to the separation. The Declaration of Independence is part of the organic law
of the United States of America United States Code Annotated http://uscode.house.gov/search/criteria.shtml
http://lefemineforlife.blogspot.com/2007/10/biblical-separation-for-nation.html


The people of Iraq have far greater freedom to enshrine their national religion of Islam in the legal structure of their
country than do Americans to honor Christianity and Biblical Law in the United States. Christianity was by far the
predominant faith of the founding generations of America, from Jamestown in 1607 to the Declaration of
Independence in 1776, and beyond, as the historical record clearly shows:

No King but King Jesus! ((Yeshua Messiah)
Declarations and Evidences of Christian Faith in America’s Colonial Charters, State Constitutions,
and other Historical Documents during over 375 Years of American History: 1606 to 1982
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/NoKingbutKingJesus.doc
The Sixth President of the United States, John Quincy Adams (son of John Adams, the Second US President, and a
signer of the Declaration of Independence), said: "The highest glory of the American Revolution was this; it connected
in one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the principles of Christianity." and "From the day of the
Declaration... they (the American people) were bound by the laws of God, which they all, and by the laws of The Gospel,
which they nearly all, acknowledge as the rules of their conduct."
Tragically, today in 2008, American law has become exceedingly anti-Christian. Witness the government-
protected murder of One Million pre-birth human beings each year (www.ldi.org).

The Constitution of the United States should be amended as first proposed by the National Reform Association in 1864, with a
Christian Amendment:

Confession of the Saviour (Messiah) as the Ruler of Nations, including America, by amending the Preamble to the United
States Constitution
In 1864, the National Reform Association advocated amending the Preamble of the Constitution of the United States to read, in
substance:
    "We, the people of the United States, humbly acknowledging Almighty God as the source of all authority and power
     in civil government, the Lord Jesus Christ as the Ruler among the nations, his revealed will as the supreme law of
     the land, in order to constitute a Christian government, and in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice,
     insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the inalienable
     rights and the blessings of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to ourselves, our posterity, and all the people,
     do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." http://candst.tripod.com/nra.htm


Explicitly Christian Politics: The Vision of the National Reform Association
www.crownandcovenant.com/product_p/ds380.htm
"Since 1864 the National Reform Association has advocated an explicitly Christian approach to politics.
In this book their vision of politics, based on the mediatorial reign of Jesus Christ over the nations, is explained for a new generation."

THE NATIONAL REFORM ASSOCIATION.;
CONVENTION IN PITTSBURG ON INSERTING A RECOGNITION OF DEITY IN THE CONSTITUTION.
February 5, 1874, Wednesday
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9D06E3DF173DE43BBC4D53DFB466838F669FDE
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=1&res=9D06E3DF173DE43BBC4D53DFB466838F669FDE&oref=slogin


Further articles on the National Reform Association
http://www.puritans.net/news/natlreformasso113004.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Reform_Association_(19th_century,_U.S.)
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3944/is_200110/ai_n9003100



"... I will build My church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." Matthew 16:18
   Yeshua Messiah

Hallelu-Yah !

Steve Lefemine, pro-life missionary
dir., Columbia Christians for Life
PO Box 50358
Columbia, SC
(803) 794-6273
www.ChristianLifeandLiberty.net
www.RighttoLifeActofSC.net
www.LefemineForLife.net
December 14, 2008

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Stats:
views:1152
posted:3/9/2009
language:English
pages:9