Powerpoint

Disparities in Childrens Health Care II

You must be logged in to download this document
Reviews
Shared by: sammyc2007
Stats
views:
32
downloads:
0
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/11/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
Impact of Children’s Health Initiatives on Access to Care for Latino Children in California Elena Fuentes-Afflick, MD, MPH Nancy A. Hessol, MSPH Tamar A. Bauer, JD University of California, San Francisco Disclosure No conflicts of interest Funding support: David and Lucile Packard Foundation Uninsurance  Uninsurance is a problem that has clinical and policy implications Uninsurance affects adults and children Reducing uninsurance among adults and children may require different policy solutions   Uninsurance - Adults  We expect adults to work and receive employer-based insurance There are very few publicly-funded insurance options for uninsured adults unless the adult qualifies for Medicaid or Medicare (eg, ESRD)  Access to Care, Children  Since the 1980’s, Medicaid has expanded to increase access to care for children  In 1997, S-CHIP was implemented to expand access to care for low-income children. In California, S-CHIP is known as “Healthy Families.” Currently, 36 million children in the US (nearly half of all children), are covered by Medicaid or S-CHIP Pear R, New York Times, April 1, 2007  Uninsured children  11% of all children in the US, more than 8 million children, remain uninsured Howell EM & Trenholm C, 2006  2 high-risk groups of children:   Moderately poor Undocumented, who cannot meet the citizenship requirements, regardless of income Uninsured children - CA  In 2002, there were nearly 1 million uninsured children in California  66% were eligible for Medicaid or Healthy Families 16% exceeded the income threshold 18% ineligible because of immigration status Trenholm C, June 2004   Children’s Health Initiatives 1992: Blue Cross developed California Kids 2001: Children’s Health Initiatives (CHI) were implemented in several California counties CHI components:   Outreach and education Healthy Kids insurance, modeled on S-CHIP program (comprehensive in/outpatient services)   Eligibility: Income above S-CHIP limit (to 300-400% FPL) Immigration status: Undocumented eligible! Howell EM, Hughes D, 2006 Millbank Q Access and Use of services  Complex set of factors influence access to care and use of services  Having insurance may be necessary but not sufficient! Other factors Individual   Health status Medical home Number of children Immigration status Barriers and fears Family    System   Linguistic competence Cultural competence Objective  To assess the effect of Children’s Health Initiatives on access to and use of health services among Latino children in California.  To assess the effect of immigration status on access to and use of health services among Latino children in California. Methods  Prospective cohort study of Latina women recruited during the delivery hospitalization at three San Francisco/Bay Area hospitals in 1999-2001  Re-interviewed at 2 and 3 years postpartum, n=711 Interview  Structured questionnaire of family attributes, all reported by the mother    Immigration status Access to care Use of health services Dependent variables  Access: Insurance status Use of Preventive Care in the last 12 months Use of Urgent Care in the last 12 months Use of Emergency Care in the last 12 months    County CHI Status County CHI status was coded based on the date of the interview and the date of implementation of CHI programs:  Yes, the child resided in a county that had a CHI program at the time of the interview  No CHI program in the county where the child resided at the time of the interview Immigration status  We coded the children’s immigration status as:    Mixed: The children in the family did not have the same immigration status Not mixed: The children in the family had the same immigration status (documented) One child Other variables Maternal    Age Education Marital status Distribution CHI   Yes, family resides in a CHI county No CHI program in the county 89.7% 10.3% Immigration status    Multiple children, mixed status Multiple children, not mixed One child 24.3% 40.6% 35.1% Uninsurance One child 4 3 Unadjusted 2 OR 1 0 2.00 3.61 1.91 >1 child, not mixed >1 child, mixed CHI Yes CHI No Use of Preventive Care >1 child, not mixed >1 child, mixed CHI No 4 3 Unadjusted 2 OR 1 0.51 0 0.40 Use of Urgent Care >1 child, not mixed >1 child, mixed CHI No 4 3 Unadjusted 2 OR 1 0.70 0 0.70 Use of Emergency Care >1 child, not mixed >1 child, mixed CHI No 4 3 Unadjusted 2 OR 1 0.56 0 0.62 2.09 Uninsurance - Multivariate >1 child, not mixed >1 child, mixed CHI No After adjusting for confounders, mixed status children were twice as likely to be uninsured as only children 4 3 Adjusted OR* 2 1 0 After adjusting for potential confounders, children residing in counties without a CHI program were twice as likely to be uninsured as children residing in counties with CHI programs 2.24 2.49 *Adjusted for maternal age, education, marital status Use of Preventive Care >1 child, not mixed >1 child, mixed CHI No Uninsured 4 Uninsured children were 34% less likely to use preventive 3 care in the previous year than insured children Adjusted OR* 2 1 0.59 0 0.58 0.66 *Adjusted for maternal age, education, marital status Use of Urgent Care >1 child, not mixed >1 child, mixed CHI No Uninsured 4 3 Adjusted OR* 2 1 0.67 0 0.67 *Adjusted for maternal age, education, marital status Use of Emergency Care >1 child, not mixed >1 child, mixed CHI No Uninsured Children residing in counties without a CHI program were twice as 4 likely to use emergency care as children residing in counties with a CHI program 3 Adjusted OR* 2 1 0.59 0 Adjusted for maternal age, education, marital status 2.16 Summary  Latino children living in counties with CHI programs have lower rates of uninsurance and lower utilization of emergency care.  Latino children of mixed immigration status have an elevated risk of uninsurance. Summary  Consistent with other studies, uninsured Latino children were 34% less likely to use preventive care services than insured children.  Use of preventive, urgent, and emergency services is inversely associated with the number of children in Latino families. Limitations  Our results may not be generalizable to Latinos in other areas of the US Immigration status was reported by the mother and may not be accurate (bias toward the null?)   Access to care and use of services were reported rather than obtained through chart review Implications  County-level CHI programs in California are associated with reductions in uninsurance among Latino children.  Lower utilization of emergency care among Latino children residing in counties with CHI programs may contribute to cost savings. Implications  Efforts should be made to maintain or expand insurance options for all children as a means of promoting use of preventive care services.  Latino children of mixed status are a high-risk group that should be targeted in research studies and policy development. Future research Further study is needed to assess the role of insurance programs, such as CHI expansions, on children’s health status and health conditions.
Related docs
Other docs by sammyc2007