A study of tree species diversity at an un-mined and a reclaimed

Document Sample
scope of work template
							A study of tree species diversity at an
 un-mined and a reclaimed forest on
 Frostburg State University campus
Diamond Alexander, Summyr Butts, Darius Daniels, Richard
Jackson, Tammy Johns, Belmont Johnson, Faith McFadden,
 Gregory Parks, Mariah Phillips, Lucas Shafer, Chaz Ward
                  and Lauren Whitley

               Biodiversity Group

                Final Presentation
                  August 1, 2008
              Biodiversity
The variety of living
things in the world
Types of Biodiversity
• Species diversity
• Genetic diversity
• Ecological diversity
    Benefits of Biodiversity
Food
Drugs/Medicine
Ecological
benefits
Aesthetics
Religious/Culture
   Decreasing Biodiversity
1/3- 2/3 of all species to be extinct
by the middle of the 21st century

Habitat destruction is the number
one cause
        Species Diversity
Species Richness (S)- the number of
different species in a community

Species Evenness (J’)- the
distribution of individuals in a
community
Why both measures are needed
Evenness often decreases before richness

Example:
• Forest A and B would have the same richness, S = 3.
• Evenness in Forest A is greater than evenness in Forest
  B.


                   Forest A        Forest B
   Species 1           4               1
   Species 2             4                1
   Species 3             4               10
  Coal Mining in Western Maryland

Began in the
1800’s
Two types:
• Underground
  mining
• Surface mining
     Underground Mining
Deep in the earth
Impacts:
• Acid Mine Drainage
  (AMD)
• Spoils that are
  brought to the
  surface
                 Surface Mining
Topsoil and overburden are removed.
Overburden- rocks and soil that lie over a
coal seam
Impacts:
•   Habitat
•   Spoils
•   Erosion
•   Landslides
•   High walls
           Reclamation
When mining is complete the mining
company must restore the land to its
original state.
Maryland laws began in 1955.
Federal laws began in 1977.
• Surface Mining Control and Reclamation
  Act (SMCRA)
   “a diverse, effective, and permanent
   vegetative cover of the same seasonal
   variety and native to the area”
  Problems with Mine Spoils
Topsoil removed
Mine spoils used as fill
Spoils
• Low organic matter
• Low, acidic pH
• Low nitrogen (N)
• Low phosphorus (P)
• Low potassium (K)
      Plant Requirements
pH- harmful if below 5.5,
many plants do not grow

Nitrogen- used for energy,
growth and overall health

Phosphorus- used for
photosynthesis, respiration,
growth and other functions

Potassium-used for
photosynthesis, energy and
other functions
      Mining at Frostburg
Campus was built
on mines.

A forest was
planted on shale
spoils.

There are still
active mines.
         Purpose
To examine the impacts of
mining on tree species diversity
           Hypotheses
Hypothesis: There will be a
difference in tree species diversity
between the mined forest and un-
mined forest.

Null Hypothesis: There will not be a
difference in tree species diversity
between the mined forest and un-
mined forest.
Methods
           Study Sites
July 22, 2008
Two sites
FSU campus
• Un-mined site
• Mined site


                     - Un-mined Site
                     - Mined Site
       Setting up the site
Circle with a 14-
m radius
Center marker
Measuring tape
Flags
                             14 m
                              14
                             meter
                             s
        Tree Identification
Identified and
recorded the
species

Living trees

3 inch diameter
breast height
(dbh)

Flagged trees
Soil Sampling
 Collected 2 samples
 from each site

 Soil corer

 Sampled “A” horizon

 Lab testing using the
 Rapitest® soil test kit
          Observations
Other types of life in the area

Aged the forest as even or uneven

Noted dead trees and health of the
forest
          Data Analysis
Shannon-Weiner Index
• Uses both species richness and species
  evenness
• Assigns a value for diversity
• Not dependant on sample size
• Compares sites
Shannon-Weiner Index
   Hs = -∑ (Pi)(log Pi)

  Hs= diversity index value
  Pi = relative abundance found

            Pi=ni/N

  ni = individuals of a species
  N = total number of individuals
       Maximum Diversity

Hs max is the maximum possible
diversity.
• Hs max = log (S)
Species Evenness (J’)


     J’= Hs/Hs max
Results
                                                       Number of Trees
                 bl
                    ac
                 su k ch




                                       0
                                           5
                                               10
                                                        15
                                                                   20
                                                                        25
                                                                             30
                                                                                  35
                                                                                       40
                     ga er
                          r m ry
                    bl a
                       ac p l
                            k e
                     wh gu
                                  m
                   wi ite
                      tc oa
                          h        k
                     re h az
                st d e l
                  rip m
                      ed a p
                             m le
               cu ba s apl
                 cu sw e
                     m oo
                         b
                   bl er t d
                am ac k r ee
                    er bir
                        ica ch
                             n




Tree Species
                       iro as
                            nw h
                                o
                           re o d
                    sp do
                         ice ak
                     pi b u
                        tc sh
                            h
                               p
                 bl d   re in e
                    ac p
                        k ine
                            lo
                              cu
                                 s
                            as t
                                pe
                                  n
                                                                                            Tree Species at the Two Forested Sites




                                               Mined
                                                        Un‐mined
                      Species Evenness Between the Sites

                  1
                0.9
                0.8
Evenness (J')




                0.7
                0.6
                0.5
                0.4
                0.3
                0.2
                0.1
                  0
                           Mined                    Un-mined
                                        Sites
                             Shannon-Weiner Index Values for the Sites

                       1.4
Shannon-Weiner Index




                       1.2
                        1
                       0.8                                               Hs
       Value




                       0.6                                               Hs max
                       0.4
                       0.2
                        0
                                    Mined               Un-mined
                                               Sites
         Soil Measurements

           pH         N            P          K
Mined    6.0-7.0   Depleted   Deficient-   Surplus
                              Depleted
Un-mined 6.0       Depleted   Depleted     Surplus
Discussion &
Conclusions
    Hypotheses Revisited
Hypothesis: There will be a
difference in tree species diversity
between the mined forest and un-
mined forest.

Null Hypothesis: There will not be a
difference in tree species diversity
between the mined forest and un-
mined forest.
     Hypothesis Accepted
Un-mined site had a higher diversity.

Un-mined site had a higher Shannon-
Weiner Index Value (Hs).

Un-mined site had a higher species
richness (S).

Un-mined site had a higher species
evenness (J’).
Maximum diversity (Hs max)
Neither site was at Hs max.

Different reason at the two sites.
       Mined Site Hs max
Hs and Hs max were lower at the
mined site.

Only 5 tree species at the site

2 main species were planted.
• Red pine
• Pitch pine
    Un-mined Site Hs max
2 main species were present.
• Sugar maple
• Witch hazel


Were not planted

It is natural for some species to be
more numerous in a forest.
 Diversity and Soil Relations
Soil test results were similar, but we believe the
sites are different.

Visual observations
• Mined Site
     Dead trees/unhealthy trees
     Little vegetation
     Thin O Soil Horizon

• Un-mined Site
     Healthy trees
     Abundant vegetation
     Thick O Soil Horizon
    Nitrogen and Phosphorus
Low at both sites

Un-mined site
•   N and P added through decay
•   Plants use it quickly
•   Stay at low levels in the soil

Mined site
• Not much N and P being added
• Plants use the limited amount
• Trees are unhealthy or dying
          Limitations
Site size was small (28 m diameter).
Only sampled one site per forest
Only sampled one forest of each type
Soil testing method
Season of sampling
Time to conduct the study
Suggestions for Improvement
Larger sites
More sites in each forest
More forest of each type
More advanced soil testing kit
Seasonal testing on soil
    Unanswered Questions
How can humans reclaim mines so they
closely resemble the surrounding forest?

Does the mined site’s tree species
diversity and soil qualities meet the
standards of the SMCRA?

Will the trees in the mined site continue to
die?
Acknowledgements
Questions

						
Related docs