Powerpoint

Diagnostic laparoscopy for periampullary and pancreatic cancer

You must be logged in to download this document
Reviews
Shared by: sammyc2007
Stats
views:
68
downloads:
6
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/10/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
STAGING OF PANCREATIC CANCER Andrew L. Warshaw, M.D. Surgeon-in-Chief and Chairman Department of Surgery Massachusetts General Hospital W. Gerald Austen Professor of Surgery Harvard Medical School The Challenge of Pancreatic Cancer No screening test Late appearance of symptoms Rapid growth and spread Pancreatic Cancer Head 60% Body/Tail 40%   20% resectable <5% resectable   20% 5-yr survival <15% 5-yr survival   <3% alive at 5 years Practical Staging of Cancer • Resection for potential cure • Confined but locally invasive/unresectable • Metastatic (distant) Triage decisions Short-term risk - local experience, age and comorbidity Long-term benefit - possible cure, quality of palliation Informed preference of patient Spread of Pancreatic Cancer Local extension/invasion Lymphatics Peri-neural channels Peritoneal cavity Blood Laparoscopic Staging Results (N=125) Unsuspected Metastases Gross Metastases Proximal Mass Distal Mass Occult Metastases (Positive cytology only) Sensitivity 39 (31%) 30 (24%) 13/78 (17%) * 17/47 (36%) * 9/94 (9.6%) 30/31 (97%) *P=0.018 Positive Peritoneal Cytology Predicts Unresectability of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma 228 patients with radiographically resectable cancers • Positive cytology in 34 (15%) • 26/34 (76%) were Stage IV with metastases • Survival with positive cytology << negative (p<0.0006) • Positive cytology had a positive predictive value of 94% Merchant (Brennan), J Am Coll Surg, 1999 Staging laparoscopy in periampullary and biliary tumors (all deemed resectable by CT) Site No. Metastases Vascular Idenfified invasion by LUS 22% 21% 17% 55% 9% 0% 17% 12% Pancreas(head/uncinate) Pancreas(body/tail) Gallbladder Extra-hepatic bile duct 72 12 11 23 Ampulla/duodenum 22 0% 0% Vollmer (Washington U., St. Louis), Ann Surg, 2002 Laparoscopic ultrasound enhances standard laparoscopy in the staging of pancreatic cancer Laparoscopic US • Added to accuracy of preop staging by CT • Added 14% to detection of vascular invasion • Increased accuracy of pre-laparotomy staging for resectability to 98% Minnard (MSKCC), Ann Surg 1998 Laparoscopic ultrasonography for vascular infiltration (50 consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer) Sensitivity 82% 94% Specificity 53% 80% Accuracy 69% 87% CT LCU* Laparoscopy, “because of its unique capabilities to detect even small peritoneal tumor deposits, …is advised in all patients. The additional benefit of (LCU) is not supported by our results …LCU is worth the extra operating time…only in patients with uncertain vascular involvement at CT.” Pietrabina (U of Pisa), World J Surg 1999 (*Laproscopic contact ultrasonography) Laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound avoided laparotomy in 20% of upper GI cancers Site Periampullary Panc.body/tail Esophagus GE junction N 200 15 52 35 Laparotomies avoided 15% 40% 5% 20% Prox.bile duct 47 40% Van Dijkum (Amsterdam), JACS 1999 The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in pancreatic and periampullary malignancies “Perioperative computed tomography is a reliable technique to detect tumor metastasis…unlike other investigators, we found that only…14% of patients with pancreatic cancer might profit from laparoscopy.” Friess (U. of Bern) JACS 1998 Diagnostic laparoscopy for periampullary and pancreatic cancer: What is the true benefit? • “after patients undergoing operative palliation were eliminated, a nontherapeutic laparotomy would have been precluded by the use of diagnostic laparoscopy in only 2.3% of patients with periampullary cancers (4 of 171 patients).” Barriero (Johns Hopkins), J Gastrointest Surg 2002 The Palliative Whipple Resection Intended Debulking or Intra-operative Escape (bad news in the pathology report) • Survival Benefit? • Dissemination? • Quality of Life? Median Survival following R1 or R2 Pancreaticoduodenectomy Reference Year # of R1 or R2 resections 1976 17 1990 1993 1995 1995 54 37 28 58 64 Positive margin R1/R2 R1/R2 R1/R2 R2 R1/R2 R1/R2 Median survival (months) 8 10 11 9 10 12 Tepper et al Trede et al Willett et al Nitecki et al Yeo et al Lillemoe et al 1996 Pisters, Brit J Surg, 2001 Pancreatic Cancer: Unresectable Disease • Palliate with biliary tract decompression (surgical bypass or stent placement) and pain management • Palliate with bypass for duodenal/gastric outlet obstruction • Chemoradiation +/- IORT for pain Pancreatic cancer patients with circulating cancer cells in blood. • Patients with peritoneal metastases – AE1/AE3 - positive cells 67%* (10/15) • Patients without peritoneal metastases – AE1/AE3 - positive cells 14%* (2/14) * p + 0.008 two-tailed Fisher exact test Selective Use of Laparoscopy in Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer • Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, not ampullary, duodenal, NE, cystic • High-quality CT to detect mets, vascular involvement • Larger primary tumors (Size?) • Location in neck, body, tail • Equivocal CT, marked weight loss, very high CA19-9, pain
Related docs
Diagnostic Haematology
Views: 131  |  Downloads: 11
Diagnostic Techniques for Endometrial Cancer
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
Quest Diagnostic
Views: 241  |  Downloads: 0
Diagnostic Parasitology
Views: 267  |  Downloads: 30
The Future of Diagnostic Tools
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Future Of Diagnostic Imaging
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 1
Diagnostic Procedures Template
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Equipment Diagnostic Report Form
Views: 178  |  Downloads: 10
Diagnostic LED numbers and codes
Views: 125  |  Downloads: 7
Diagnostic Codes Quick Reference
Views: 6  |  Downloads: 0
SUMMARY OF RESEARCH AND DIAGNOSTIC ACTIVITIES
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
What Is Diagnostic Medical Imaging
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 2
Other docs by sammyc2007