Chest Pain Evaluation Complimentary Role of Cardiac CT and

W
Document Sample
scope of work template
							                   Chest Pain Evaluation: Complimentary Role of
                   Cardiac CT and MR
                    Minh Nguyen MD, Christopher Klassen MD, PhD,
                    Kiran Kareti, MD, Birgit Stolze,
                    Alan Siuciak, Norbert Wilke, MD

                    University of Florida, Jacksonville, Health Science
                    Center, Department of Radiology and
                    Cardiovascular Center

                    Corresponding Author:
                    Norbert Wilke, MD
                    Associate Professor of Radiology
                    Associate Professor of Medicine
                    Chief, Cardiovascular MR and CT
                    University of Florida
                    Health Science Center
                    655 West Eighth Street
                    Jacksonville, FL, 32209-6511
                    Call: 904-244-8723
                    Page: 904-306-4256
                    Fax: 904-244-3382




            Introduction




C
        oronary artery disease (CAD) continues to              invasive imaging plays a much less important role
        be one of the leading causes of death in the           in these patients. Since cardiac catheterization does
        United States. Each year, approximately 8              carry a small morbidity (1-2%) and mortality risk
million patients are seen in the emergency room for            (0.1%), alternative noninvasive modalities to iden-
chest pain. About 25% have acute MI or unstable an-            tify the low risk patients to exclude them from the
gina, 25% have stable angina, and up to 50% have               costs and risks of cardiac catheterization is desirable.
non-cardiac chest pain. The cost is over $3 billion            Noninvasive modalities are also needed to assess the
for those without acute diseases. Unfortunately, at            intermediate risk patients, such as those with prior
the same time, about 5% of patients with MI are sent           myocardial infarction (MI), diabetes, or peripheral
home from the ER and results in 20% of malpractice             vascular diseases, to determine if the chest pain is of
payout.                                                        coronary origin requiring further interventions. Mo-
                                                               dalities such as echocardiogram, nuclear perfusion
Guidelines such as TIMI Risk Score have been devel-            imaging, and exercise stress testing have been used
oped to allow triage of chest pain patients. Patients          to assess for ischemia in patients with chest pain.
are-classified as low-risk (TIMI score <3), interme-           Advances in CT and MRI have allowed these two
diate risk (3 ≤ TIMI score < 5), or high risk (TIMI            modalities to play an increasingly important and
score ≥ 5) requiring urgent cardiac catheterization            complementary role in evaluation of CAD.
and interventions. As high-risk patients have clear
symptoms and require cardiac catheterization, non-


                                               Chest Pain Evaluation: Complimentary Role of Cardiac CT and MR       127
Computed Tomography                                          coronary arteries, grafts are characterized by less
In the past, cardiac imaging necessitated specialized        cardiac motion, a wider luminal diameter, and fewer
equipment such as electron-beam CT. Advances in              calcifications, allowing for reliable assessment of the
multi-detector CT have now allo wed for acquisition          bypass grafts by MDCT. 16-slice MDCT shows PPV
of motion-free sub-millimeter resolution images of           of 81% and NPV of 99% in detection of graft occlu-
the heart with ECG gating in one breath hold. ECG            sion compared with invasive coronary angiography i.
gating also allows for cine imaging, assessing ven-          Overall, 74% of the distal bypass anastamoses could
tricular contractile function by reconstruction of im-       be visualized on MDCT. The causes of nonvisuali-
ages at different cardiac phases. The isotropic voxel        zation of distal anastamoses are poor opacification,
nature of MDCT allows for ease of 3-dimensional              metal clip artifacts, or cardiac motion artifacts.
multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) and volume ren-
dering techniques (VRT), increasing the diagnostic           Detection of congenital anomalous coronary arteries
confidence. Due to high resolution and short acquisi-        as a cause of chest pain is also another indication
tion time, ECG gated MDCT holds a distinct advan-            for MDCT. The incidence of anomalous coronary
tage over cardiac MRI in morphological coronary              artery ranges from 0.3 to 2.2% of the general popu-
imaging.                                                     lation j. A right coronary artery, or less commonly, a
                                                             left coronary artery which courses between the aor-
Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is associated            tic root and the pulmonary trunk is a cause of acute
with underlying risk factors such as physical inac-          myocardial infarction and sudden death in children
tivity, obesity, and is associated with increased risk       and young adults. Compared to MDCT, invasive cor-
of MI as predicted by the Framingham criteria in             onary angiography was able to diagnose only 55%
asymptomatic individuals a b. MDCT has been shown            of the anomalous coronary arteries that were seen on
to be comparable to EBCT in determination of coro-           MDCT k.
nary calcification c. In the setting of stable chest pain,
patients without ischemic EKG changes presenting             MDCT has several limitations in evaluating CAD.
to the emergency room, a total calcium score of 0            The dose of radiation ranges from 0.45 mSv for
is associated with an annual cardiac event rate of <         EKG-gated noncontrast calcium scoring to 7.1 mSv
1% over an average follow-up period of 50 months             for ECG gated contrast coronary CT angiography
d
  . The NPV of a calcium score of 0 was 0.97 for all         with a 16-slice MDCT l. The dose for 64-slice car-
cardiac events 4. In patients less than 50 years old,        diac CT is unfortunately higher, even with pulse
a small but significant number have significant an-          modulation. The presence of arrhythmia also will
giographic CAD but do not have coronary calcifica-           markedly decrease the quality of ECG gating and the
tion on CT e. Even in older patients with unknown            corresponding quality of images. A high heart rate
CAD, up to 10% may have noncalcified plaques f. It           above 70 will also decrease the diagnostic quality of
is therefore advisable that contrast should be used to       the study. Other limitations include contrast adverse
evaluate significant stenoses caused by soft plaques,        reactions and exacerbation of renal insufficiency. Ex-
especially in younger patients, if there is no contrain-     tensive coronary calcification can also cause bloom-
dication.                                                    ing artifacts preventing adequate evaluation for sig-
                                                             nificant stenosis. The moderate positive predictive
Other indications of MDCT in chest pain evalua-              value (≈75%) limits utility of MDCT for assessing
tion include evaluation for patency of bypass grafts         significant obstruction of native coronary arteries in
g
  . After 3 years, 20-30% of the bypass grafts can be        high-risk patients secondary to coronary calcification
occluded. In a mean of 5 years after bypass surgery,         as the major cause of false positive findings m n.
almost every third patient had an unexpected bypass
graft occlusion in a study h. It is therefore important
to detect graft occlusion early, as the clinical out-
come of the patients is closely related to the patency
rate of their bypass grafts. Compared with native


128        SECTION 3 Volumetric Cardiac Imaging
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging                           complex schemes such as the use of vector ECG are
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imag-                needed for reliable R-wave detection compared to
ing has made dramatic progress since its inception           MDCT 15.
in the 1980’s. Advancement in ultra-fast sequences
and parallel imaging techniques has now allowed for          Direct visualization of the coronary arteries with
assessment of cardiovascular anatomy, global func-           high-resolution CMR imaging generally required
tion, valvular status, perfusion status, myocardial          much longer study acquisition time compared to
viability, and proximal to mid coronary anatomy in           MDCT. Even with the use of subject specific adap-
a single image setting. Furthermore, compared to             tive respiratory gating, the high-resolution (in-plane
MDCT, CMR does not involve ionized radiation or              resolution 1.0mm x 0.78mm) coronary MRA acqui-
iodinated contrast. As CMR is a four-dimensional             sition time was approximately 2.3 minutes for both
high resolution imaging technique, this allows for           left and right coronary with vessel length imaged out
assessment of perfusion, infarction, and function at         to approximately 8 mm for the right coronary artery
the subendocardial level not available in echocardi-         and 6mm for the left coronary artery 17. The sensitiv-
ography or nuclear medicine. Contrast between dif-           ity and specificity for detection of significant coro-
ferent tissue types can be changed by simply adjust-         nary stenoses was 74.3% and 88.2% respectively in
ing the sequence parameters, i.e. T1 or T2 weighted,         their study. Inability to image distal portions of coro-
without the need of any exogenous contrast. Intrave-         nary arteries, especially that of the circumflex artery,
nous MRI contrast material can be injected to fur-           is a limitation of coronary MRA 17 18. Detection of
ther delineate pathology, and to evaluate perfusion          anomalous coronary arteries is, however, an excel-
and viability if needed. The risk of adverse reactions       lent indication for coronary MRA due to the inherent
(such as anaphylatoid reaction or renal function ag-         3-D nature of coronary MRA and the need to only
gravation) to MRI contrasts is much lower than that          visualize the proximal portions of the coronary arter-
of CT contrasts. Additionally, recent developments           ies s (Bunce, Lorenz).
have allowed for acquisition of parameters such as
myocardial perfusion reserve and wall strain force           The excellent temporal and spatial resolution of
that have only been available traditionally with in-         CMR allows detection and quantitative evaluation of
vasive methods. The availability of cardiac MRI is           ischemic heart disease at subendocardial level. Do-
however more limited compared to MDCT due to                 butamine stress MRI has been shown to have better
higher level of required expertise and preparation           sensitivity (86% versus 74%), specificity (86% ver-
and examination time.                                        sus 70%), and accuracy (86% versus 73%) compared
                                                             to dobutamine transthoracic echocardiography 20.
Similar to MDCT, CMR is very susceptible to arti-
facts caused by breathing and, therefore requires the        Myocardial perfusion CMR imaging performed with
use of breath-hold sequences. Imaging of the coro-           vasodilator infusion (such as adenosine or dypyrida-
nary arteries may require up to twenty 10-second             mole) and gadolinium contrast injection allows for
breath-holds due to the required high resolution. The        quantitative myocardial perfusion reserve measure-
variation between each breath-hold can also lead to          ment. The increased signal in the myocardium due
image artifacts. Real-time “navigator” respiratory           to contrast enhancement before and after vasodila-
gating has been developed to allow for coronary              tor infusion can be quantified to provide indices
imaging 15. As with MDCT, CMR also relies on ac-             such as myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) 21. A
curate detection of QRS complex with ECG gating              positive correlation (r=0.80, p<0.01) has been shown
to acquire images of the heart without blurring ar-          between the reduced myocardial perfusion reserve
tifacts. In patients with frequent arrhythmia, retro-        and reduced coronary flow reserve in patients with
spective ECG gated sequences are available, albeit           microvascular dysfunction 22. The ability to non-in-
at the cost of longer breath-holds due to longer im-         vasively provide myocardial perfusion reserve al-
aging time. Due to the magnetohydrodynamic effect            lows for objective assessment of therapy efficacy in
from the flow of blood within a magnetic field, more         patients with endothelial dysfunction such as those


                                              Chest Pain Evaluation: Complimentary Role of Cardiac CT and MR      129
with diabetes, hypertension, syndrome X, and left          Cardiac MRI has been shown to accurately assess
ventricular hypertrophy w x.                               the severity and the extent of myocardial necro-
                                                           sis and viability by the delayed hyperenhancement
A positive correlation (r=0.71, p<0.01) between my-        imaging done 10-20 minutes after gadolinium con-
ocardial perfusion reserve and fractional flow reserve     trast administration. In this technique, fibrosis and
(FFR) has also been shown. A myocardial perfusion          infracted areas show increased signal intensity com-
reserve cutoff of 2.3 has a sensitivity of 88.9% (95%      pared to surrounding normal myocardium. Studies
CI, 51.8-99.7%), and a specificity of 85.7% (95% CI,       have shown correlation between the transmural ex-
42.1%-99.6%) in predicting a significantly decreased       tent of the hyperenhancement and regional function-
FFR < 0.75 y. Myocardial perfusion reserve, there-         al improvement following revascularization z. Even
fore, can also be utilized to predict possible need of     thinned, severely hypokinetic myocardium has been
intervention in segmental ischemia. Currently, the         shown to have functional improvement after revascu-
routine utilization of myocardial perfusion reserve        larization if there is no delayed hyperenhancement aa.
is hindered by the current necessity for the user to       An acute infarction can show a nonenhancing central
manually draw regions of interests to obtain regional      region with peripheral enhancement due to microv-
perfusion indices over multiple slices. It is anticipat-   ascular obstruction at the center. The presence of
ed that further software development will allow this       this finding is associated with greater morbidity and
process to become more automated over time.                impaired functional recovery ab. Compared to other
                                                           techniques such as SPECT and PET, cardiac MRI is
                                                           at least as accurate or slightly superior in predicting
                                                           functional improvement with the added advantage of
                                                           higher resolution allowing for detection of infarction
                                                           at the subendocardial level ac.




130       SECTION 3 Volumetric Cardiac Imaging
Complementary usage of cardiac                                Conclusion
CT and MRI                                                    Cardiac CT and MRI can be used in complementary
Complementary usage of cardiac CT and MRI ex-                 roles to evaluate chest pain patients non-invasively in
ploiting each modality’s advantages would provide             a cost effective and expeditious manner. We antici-
the most effective evaluation of a patient presenting         pate that further studies and future advancements in
with chest pain.                                              the technology will increase their usage and utility in
                                                              the evaluation of chest pain patients.
Based on the above mentioned evidences, a strategy
using cardiac CT and MRI in a complementary fash-             CASE PRESENTATIONS
ion is proposed, taken into account that the availabil-
ity and speed of cardiac CT is higher than that of            Case 1 - COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY/
cardiac MRI (Please refer to the diagram below):              COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY
                                                              CHEST - CARDIAC STUDY.
A chest pain patient is triaged into low, intermedi-
ate, and high risk according to clinical findings, EKG        ADDENDUM:
findings, and TIMI Risk Score. Those patients with             On the provided images, there is also evidence of
positive cardiac markers, ST elevation, or high-risk          significant amount of calcification distributed in the
TIMI score are directed to cardiac catheterization, as        perihilar area as well as the AP window. In addition,
non-invasive imaging has no role in the management            there are several small lymph nodes identified meas-
of these patients. Low-risk and intermediate-risk pa-         uring up to 1 cm in size.
tients are evaluated with cardiac CT to risk stratify
and evaluate for significant occlusion of the coro-           IMPRESSION:
nary arteries by soft plaques. If cardiac CT shows            There is evidence of granulomatous disease of the
significant coronary stenosis, cardiac catheterization        mediastinum as well as the perihilar structures. Sev-
is performed for early intervention, as the stenosis          eral small lymph nodes are identified in the medias-
may be causing unstable angina. In low-risk pa-               tinal area. If clinically indicated, a chest computed
tients with a cardiac CT negative for coronary cal-           tomography study and/or chest x-ray study would be
cification and significant stenosis, the patient can be       recommended.
discharged home and followed-up as an outpatient.
Patients showing significant coronary calcification           CLINICAL HISTORY: The patient is a 51-year-old
on cardiac CT or classified as intermediate-risk, are         male suffering from chest pain. He tested positive
further evaluated with stress/rest perfusion cardiac          EKG for ischemia and was being evaluated for coro-
MRI. If ischemia is detected, cardiac MRI or cardiac          nary artery disease.
catheterization can be performed.
                                                              Method:
Patients with risk factors for endothelial dysfunc-           16 multislice computed tomography scanning of
tion and syndrome X with a cardiac CT negative for            the coronary arteries was performed. Calcium scor-
calcification and without significant obstruction are         ing was assessed quantitatively with a precontrast
evaluated with cardiac MRI for findings of microvas-          computed tomography scan with 2 mm thick slices
cular disease by measuring the myocardial perfusion           covering the complete heart. Contrast bolus of a to-
reserve. Follow-up assessment can be performed                tal of 90 cc Visipaque IV was injected to perform a
with cardiac MRI to evaluate the effectiveness of             contrast enhanced coronary computed tomography
medical therapy optimization.                                 angiogram without immediate side effects. 3-D re-
                                                              construction as well as multiplanar reconstruction
                                                              was performed using the Aquarius Workstation from
                                                              TeraRecon, Inc.




                                               Chest Pain Evaluation: Complimentary Role of Cardiac CT and MR     131
   Figure 1 No coronary calcium on CT scan. Multiple     Figure 2a 3D Volume Rendering showing mid
        classified nodes-granulomatous disease                          LAD stenosis




FINDINGS:
Calcium scoring: There is a 0 calcium score for
the right coronary artery and left coronary artery.
(Figure 1)




COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY CORONARY
ANGIOGRAM:
LAD: At the mid aspect of the LAD, there is a 75%
to 80% significant narrowing. This lesion is located
between the first and the second perforator branch-
es. In addition, there is a significant amount of soft
plaque visualized. (Figures 2-5)




                                                         Figure 2b 3D Volume Rendering showing mid
                                                                       LAD stenosis



132       SECTION 3 Volumetric Cardiac Imaging
 Figure 3 MIP LAD Stenosis                      Figure 5a Angiogram of Heart. 75% mid LAD stenosis




Figure 4 CPR of LAD stenosis                   Figure 5b Angiogram of Heart. 75% mid LAD stenosis




                               Chest Pain Evaluation: Complimentary Role of Cardiac CT and MR   133
                                                           IMPRESSION:

                                                              1) Significant mid LAD coronary stenosis of 75
                                                                 to 80%.

                                                              2) LAD Stenosis with significant soft plaque bur-
                                                                 den.

                                                           CONCLUSIONS:
                                                              1. CORONARY STATUS: ASCAD: severe cul-
                                                                 prit mid LAD coronary disease as assessed by
                                                                 CTA.

                                                              2. LOW NORMAL LV Systolic Function.

                                                           After a brief discussion of the options, risks and ben-
                                                           efits the patient elected IVUS and PCI of the LAD,
                 Figure 6 MIP of LCX
                                                           which was recommended.

LCX: The LCX does not show significant coronary
artery stenosis in the first two-thirds of the coronary
artery segments. (Figure 6)




RCA: The right coronary artery does not show any
significant coronary stenosis of the first two-thirds of
the right coronary artery segments.(Figure 7)




                 Figure 7 MIP of RCA




134       SECTION 3 Volumetric Cardiac Imaging
Case 2 - CTA CARDIAC

HISTORY:
 The patient is a 61-year-old female with onset of
chest pain in the morning hours. She was admitted to
the emergency room. The patient was then evaluated
for coronary artery disease.

Method: Non-contrast 16-slice multi detector CT
imaging of the heart was performed pre-contrast in
transverse slice position. Quantification of the cal-
cium score was available for interpretation. In addi-
tion, 16-slice multi detector coronary angiography
was performed injecting a total dose of 100 cc’s
Ultravist IV without immediate side effects. A dual
injector protocol was used. 3D post processing of the
coronary arteries was performed using the Aquarius
                                                                  Figure 9a Angiogram of LAD, showing total proximal
Workstation from TeraRecon, Inc. The patient was
                                                                                   LAD occlusion
also administered a total of 10 mg Metoprolol with a
recorded heart rate of 50-60 beats per minute. The pa-
tient was stable hemodynamically during and shortly
after the exam. Her blood pressure was 160/90.                  CT angiography:
                                                                 Left main coronary artery: There is no evidence of
FINDINGS:                                                       significant coronary artery stenosis within the left
Calcium scoring; There is significant calcification             main coronary artery.
noted in the circumflex coronary artery as well as in
the LAD. Calcium score for the left main coronary               LAD: There is evidence of a significant coronary ste-
artery is 11.0. The calcium score for the LAD is 66.2.          nosis at the mid LAD (Figures 9, 10, 11, 12).
The calcium score for the circumflex is 252.7. The
calcium score for the right coronary artery is 63.1.
The total calcium score is 393.0 (Please refer to the
table below).



                                          Equivalent Agatston
 Artery               Number of Lesions
                                          Score
 LM                   1                   11.0
 LAD                  2                   66.2
 CX                   3                   252.7
 RCA                  1                   63.1
 Total                7                   393.0


Threshold = 130 HU

                  Figure 8 Calcium Scoring




                                              Chest Pain Evaluation: Complimentary Role of Cardiac CT and MR       135
                                                            Figure 11 MIP of LAD
  Figure 9b Angiogram of LAD, Left to right collaterals
                  from LAD to RCA




      Figure 10 3D Volume Rendering of Heart, Severe      Figure 12 MIP of LAD and LCX
                      LAD occlusion



136         SECTION 3 Volumetric Cardiac Imaging
               Figure 13 MIP of LCX                                     Figure 14b Angiogram of RCA


LCX: Coronary stenoses suggested in particular of          NOTE: It is noted that during the contrast ejection,
the LCX side branches of indeterminate significance.       there was evidence of a resting perfusion defect not-
( Figure 13)                                               ed in the anterior, septal, apical area. This is sugges-
                                                           tive of a high degree stenosis/subtotal occlusion of
                                                           the LAD.

RCA: Suggested proximal right coronary stenosis of
indeterminate signficance. (Figures 14, 15)                IMPRESSION:
                                                            The calcification is significant considering the age
                                                           of the patient. This is suggestive of a significantly in-




     Figure 14a Angiogram of RCA, 80% Proximal                    Figure 15 MIP of RCA, Significant proximal
                   RCA stenosis                                                RCA stenosis



                                            Chest Pain Evaluation: Complimentary Role of Cardiac CT and MR       137
creased risk for major coronary events. Additionally,
there are evidences of a significant coronary steno-
sis/occlusion of the mid LAD, of coronary stenoses
of the RCA and LCX, and of a resting perfusion de-
fect in the anterior apical and anterior septal region
(Figure 16).




                         REST                                                         STRESS




                     Figure 16 MRI of heart, Large area of ischemia at inferolateral, inferior wall




138       SECTION 3 Volumetric Cardiac Imaging
    References

a   Desai MY, Nasir K, Braunstein JB, Rumberger JA, Post               m Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Baumbach A, Georg C,
    WS, Budoff MJ, Blumenthal RS. Underlying risk factors                Kuzo R, Heuschmid M, Ohnesorge B, Karsch KR, Claussen
    incrementally add to the standard risk estimate in detecting         CD. Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolu-
    subclinical atherosclerosis in low- and intermediate-risk            tion multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in
    middle-aged asymptomatic individuals. Am Heart J. 2004               102 patients. Eur Heart J. 2002 Nov;23(21):1714-25.
    Nov;148(5):871-7.
                                                                       n   Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC, Ferencik M, Jang
b   Wong ND, Vo A, Abrahamson D, Tobis JM, Eisenberg                       IK, Diaz LJ, Abbara S, Brady TJ, Achenbach S. Predictive
    H, Detrano RC. Detection of coronary artery calcium by                 value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography
    ultrafast computed tomography and its relation to clinical             to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in
    evidence of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1994                patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient-
    Feb 1;73(4):223-7.                                                     versus segment-based analysis. Circulation. 2004 Oct
                                                                           26;110(17):2638-43. Epub 2004 Oct 18.
c   Stanford W, Thompson BH, Burns TL, Heery SD, Burr
    MC. Coronary artery calcium quantification at multi-detec-         o   Oshinski JN, Hofland L, Dixon WT, Pettigrew RI. Magnetic
    tor row helical CT versus electron-beam CT. Radiology.                 resonance coronary angiography using navigator echo
    2004 Feb;230(2):397-402.                                               gated real-time slice following. Int J Card Imaging. 1998
                                                                           Jun;14(3):191-9.
d   Georgiou D, Budoff MJ, Kaufer E, Kennedy JM, Lu B,
    Brundage BH. Screening patients with chest pain in the             p   Chia JM, Fisher SE, Wickline SA, Lorenz CH. Performance
    emergency department using electron beam tomography: a                 of QRS detection for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    follow-up study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Jul;38(1):105-10.             with a novel vectorcardiographic triggering method. JMRI
                                                                           2000:12(5) 678-688.
e   Fallavollita JA, Brody AS, Bunnell IL, Kumar K, Canty
    JM Jr. Fast computed tomography detection of coronary              q   Plein S, Jones TR, Ridgway JP, Sivananthan MU. Three-
    calcification in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.             dimensional coronary MR angiography performed with
    Comparison with angiography in patients < 50 years old.                subject-specific cardiac acquisition windows and mo-
    Circulation. 1994 Jan;89(1):285-90.                                    tion-adapted respiratory gating. Am J Roentgenol. 2003
                                                                           Feb;180(2):505-12.
f   Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Kopp AF, Heuschmidt M, Burg-
    stahler C, Herdeg C, Claussen CD. Noninvasive evaluation           r   Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, Flamm SD, Plein S, Nagel
    of the prevalence of noncalcified atherosclerotic plaques by           E, Langerak SE, Weber OM, Pedersen EM, Schmidt M,
    multi-slice detector computed tomography: results of a pilot           Botnar RM, Manning WJ. Coronary magnetic resonance
    study. Int J Cardiol. 2003 Dec;92(2-3):151-5.                          angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses.
                                                                           N Engl J Med. 2001 Dec 27;345(26):1863-9.
g   Fernandez GC. Bypass graft imaging and coronary anoma-
    lies in MDCT. Eur Radiol. 2005 Feb;15 Suppl 2:B59-61.              s   Bunce NH, Lorenz CH, Keegan J, Lesser J, Reyes EM,
                                                                           Firmin DN, Pennell DJ. Coronary artery anomalies: as-
h   Silber S, Finsterer S, Krischke I, Lochow P, Muhling                   sessment with free-breathing three-dimensional coronary
    H. Noninvasive angiography of coronary bypass grafts                   MR angiography. Radiology. 2003 Apr;227(1):201-8. Epub
    with cardio-CT in a cardiology practice. Herz. 2003                    2003 Feb 11.
    Mar;28(2):126-35.
                                                                       t   Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W, Klein C, Vogel U,
i   Schlosser T, Konorza T, Hunold P, Kuhl H, Schmermund A,                Frantz E, Ellmer A, Dreysse S, Fleck E. Noninvasive diag-
    Barkhausen J. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery             nosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with
    bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography.               the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Sep 15;44(6):1224-9.                           with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation. 1999
                                                                           Feb 16;99(6):763-70.
j   Chaitman BR, Lesperance J, Saltiel J, Bourassa MG. Clini-
    cal, angiographic, and hemodynamic findings in patients            u   Jerosch-Herold M, Wilke N, Stillman AE. Magnetic reso-
    with anomalous origin of the coronary arteries. Circulation.           nance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve
    1976 Jan;53(1):122-31.                                                 with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution.
                                                                           Med Phys. 1998 Jan;25(1):73-84.
k   Schmitt R, Froehner S, Brunn J, Wagner M, Brunner H,
    Cherevatyy O, Gietzen F, Christopoulos G, Kerber S, Fell-          v   Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, Wang Y, Huang Y, Christensen
    ner F. Congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries: imag-            BV, Stillman AE, Ugurbil K, McDonald K, Wilson RF.
    ing with contrast-enhanced, multidetector computed tomog-              Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisec-
    raphy. Eur Radiol. 2005 Jun;15(6):1110-21. Epub 2005 Mar               tion, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging.
    9.                                                                     Radiology. 1997 Aug;204(2):373-84.
l   Flohr TG, Schoepf UJ, Kuettner A, Halliburton S, Bruder            w Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: twenty-
    H, Suess C, Schmidt B, Hofmann L, Yucel EK, Schaller S,              first century solutions in cardiology. Clin Med. 2003 May-
    Ohnesorge BM. Advances in cardiac imaging with 16-sec-               Jun;3(3):273-8.
    tion CT systems. Acad Radiol. 2003 Apr;10(4):386-401.




                                                       Chest Pain Evaluation: Complimentary Role of Cardiac CT and MR                     139
          References continued

      x   Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, Grothues F, Firmin
          DN, Collins P, Pennell DJ. Abnormal subendocardial per-
          fusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular
          magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun
          20;346(25):1948-53.

      y   Shoemaker S, Costa M, Nguyen M, Batmunh O, Gilmore
          P, Talwar K, Zenni M, Guzman L, Patrick M, Dominick
          A, Bass T, Wilke NW. Quantitative Cardiac Magnetic
          Resonance Perfusion To Detect Physiologically Significant
          Coronary Disease: Comparison With Invasive Physiologic
          Assessments And Quantitative Coronary Angiography. Sub-
          mitted for consideration as presentation at American Heart
          Association 2005 Scientific Sessions.

      z   Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen EL, Parker MA, Simonetti
          O, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Judd RM. The use of contrast-
          enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify revers-
          ible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov
          16;343(20):1445-53.

      aa Shah PJ, Kim HW, Elliott M, Wu E, Shah BB, Thompson
         LEJ, KLem I, Parker MA, Bonow RO, Judd RM, Kim RJ.
         Contrast MRI predicts reverse remodeling and contractile
         improvement in Akinetic Thinned Myocardium. JCMR
         2004; 6;1; 66 (abstract).

      ab Wu KC, Kim RJ, Bluemke DA, Rochifte CE, Zerhouni EA,
         Becker LC, Lima JA: Quantification and time course of
         microvascular obstruction by contrast-enhanced echocardi-
         ography and magnetic resonance imaging following acute
         myocardial infarction and reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol.
         1998 Nov 15;32(6):1756-64.

      ac Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM, Momose M, Sammer A,
         Haas F, Schnackenburg B, Delius W, Mudra H, Wolfram
         D, Schwaiger M. Assessment of myocardial viability with
         contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: com-
         parison with positron emission tomography. Circulation.
         2002;105:162-7.




140          SECTION 3 Volumetric Cardiac Imaging

						
Related docs