NTP, Inc. v. AT

Document Sample
NTP, Inc. v. AT
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
48
posted:
4/9/2008
language:
pages:
2
NTP, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility, LLC Doc. 11

Case 3:07-cv-00550-JRS Document 11 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 1 of 2









IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION







NTP, INC.





v. CASE NO. 3:07CV550-JRS





AT&T MOBILITY, LLC







NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE





This case has been placed on Chief Judge Spencer's docket, and a pretrial conference will



be held on OCTOBER 31, 2007, at 9:35 A.M. The conference will last approximately five (5)



minutes and will take place in the Chambers of Chief Judge Spencer, Third Floor, United States



Courthouse, 1000 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia. Attendance by an attorney for each



party is required, and the pretrial conference cannot be conducted by conference call. The Court





will set a trial date within ninety (90) days of the date of the pretrial conference except in cases of



protracted litigation.





Counsel are advised that failure to file a report as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) will be



considered by the Court as the parties' decision to forego the provisions of the Rule.



Any objections to the initial disclosure filed with the Court as provided in Fed.R.Civ.P.



26 will be resolved by the United States Magistrate Judges following the pretrial conference.



Counsel attending the pretrial conference should be prepared to present the disputed issues to the



Court.









Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:07-cv-00550-JRS Document 11 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 2 of 2









It is possible that the Court may determine that this case is suitable for magistrate's



jurisdiction. The parties shall be deemed to have consented and agreed to such jurisdiction



unless a party informs the Court of its unwillingness to proceed before the Magistrate Judge in a



pleading filed with the Clerk no later than two (2) business days before the scheduled pretrial



conference. The Court will not consider any filing which fails to comply with this requirement.



Counsel attending the pretrial conference are to be sufficiently knowledgeable of the case



to respond to such queries as the Court may deem appropriate, be prepared to set a firm trial date,



and to discuss settlement prospects.









FERNANDO GALINDO, CLERK









Linda K. McDonald

Deputy Clerk









Date: October 5,2007









IF THIS CASE IS SETTLED PRIOR TO THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, PLEASE CALL

ME AT 804-916-2231. THANK YOU.


Share This Document


Related docs
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Knight v. LaVandeira - 5
Views: 25  |  Downloads: 0
Jensen v. Pfizer - 2
Views: 47  |  Downloads: 0
Best Deals on TV, Inc. et al v. Naveed et al - 8
Views: 166  |  Downloads: 1
Carmack v. The Chase Manhattan Bank - 5
Views: 71  |  Downloads: 0
Never-Misses-A-Shot v. Sherrod - 2
Views: 48  |  Downloads: 0
Riches v. Brand et al - 3
Views: 21  |  Downloads: 0
Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc - 32
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
by registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!