Kanter v. California Administrative Office of the Courts - 17

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
36
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/9/2008
language:
pages:
0
Kanter v. California Administrative Office of the Courts Doc. 17 Case 3:07-cv-02423-MJJ Document 17 Filed 08/21/2007 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 v. LUCIA KANTER, Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C-07-2423 MJJ Clerk's Notice CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, Defendant, / (Plaintiff is required to serve, and file proof of service with the Court, any party involved not listed on the attached proof of service.) YOU ARE NOTIFIED THAT the Court has rescheduled the Case Management Conference hearing scheduled for Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. before the Honorable Martin J. Jenkins. The hearing has been reset for September 18, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. A joint statement from the parties is due seven days prior to the conference. Please report to Courtroom 11, on the 19th floor, U.S. Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. FOR THE COURT, Dated: 8/21/07 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By:_____________________ Edward Butler Courtroom Deputy Please refer to Judge Jenkins' Standing Order located at www.cand.uscourts.gov for additional 24 information. Pursuant to the Standing Order, the rescheduling of a hearing date for a motion does not change the date on which an opposition brief or reply brief is due; any opposition brief remains due 25 not less than 21 days prior to the date of the originally noticed hearing and any reply brief is due not less than 14 days prior to the originally noticed hearing date. 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs