Docstoc

Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Blockdot, Inc. et al - 38

Document Sample
Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Blockdot, Inc. et al - 38 Powered By Docstoc
					Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Blockdot, Inc. et al                                                               Doc. 38
                   Case 2:07-cv-00263-TJW-CE           Document 38        Filed 08/01/2007    Page 1 of 2



                                         IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                          FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                                  MARSHALL DIVISION

               BENEFICIAL INNOVATIONS, INC.,              §
                                                          §
                      Plaintiff,                          §
                                                          §
               v.                                         § CASE NO. 2:07-CV-263-TJW/CE
                                                          §
               BLACKDOT, INC., a Texas corporation;       §
               CAREERBUILDER, LLC., a Delaware            §
               corporation; CNET NETWORKS, INC., a        §
               Delaware corporation; DIGG, INC., a        §
               Delaware corporation; EBAUM’S WORLD,       §
               INC., a New York corporation; JABEZ        §
               NETWORKS, INC., a Tennessee corporation; §
               THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, a              §
               New York corporation; THE WASHINGTON §
               POST COMPANY, a Delaware corporation;      §
               THE WEATHER CHANNEL                        §
               INTERACTIVE, INC., a Georgia corporation., §
                                                          §
                      Defendant.                          §    Jury Trial Requested



                         THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
                        EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
                       PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT


                       Defendant The New York Times Company files this Unopposed Motion for Extension of

               Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s Original Complaint and would show the

               Court the following:

                       Defendant was served with a copy of Plaintiff’s Original Complaint.        The current

               deadline for Defendant to file its answer is August 1, 2007. Defendant respectfully requests the

               Court to extend the date on or before they must file an answer or other responsive pleading to

               September 12, 2007. Counsel for Defendant has conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, and

               counsel has indicated the Plaintiff does not oppose this Motion.




                                                                                                         Dockets.Justia.com
   Case 2:07-cv-00263-TJW-CE         Document 38       Filed 08/01/2007       Page 2 of 2



       WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant respectfully requests that this

Court grant Defendant’s motion.



Dated: August 1, 2007                     Respectfully submitted,

                                          McKOOL SMITH, P.C.

                                          /s/ Sam Baxter____________
                                          Sam Baxter
                                          State Bar No. 01938000
                                          sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
                                          505 East Travis Street, Suite 105
                                          P.O. Box O

                                          Marshall, Texas 75670
                                          Telephone: 903-927-2111
                                          Facsimile: 903-927-2622

                                          ATTORNEYS FOR
                                          THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY




                              CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

        The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in
compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel of record
on this the 1st day of August, 2007.



                                                 /s/ Sam Baxter________
                                                 Sam Baxter

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Stats:
views:15
posted:4/10/2008
language:English
pages:2