Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 5

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
35
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/9/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. Doc. 5 Case 3:07-cv-02852-MJJ Document 5 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP Lee H. Rubin (SBN 141331) lrubin@mayerbrownrowe.com Shirish Gupta (SBN 205584) sgupta@mayerbrownrowe.com Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, California 94306-2112 Telephone: (650) 331-2000 Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 Attorneys for Defendant TD AMERITRADE, INC. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PADB01 44038047.1 20-Jun-07 11:31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION MATTHEW ELVEY, an individual, on his own behalf and on behalf of all similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. TD AMERITRADE, INC., a New York corporation Defendant. CASE NO. C 07 2852 BZ STIPULATION TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT Whereas, Plaintiff Matthew Elvey (“Plaintiff”) has filed a Complaint against Defendant TD AMERITRADE, Inc. (“TD AMERITRADE”) and served a Summons and Complaint on June 1, 2007; Whereas, Plaintiff has informed TD AMERITRADE that he plans to file an Amended Complaint; Whereas, TD AMERITRADE's deadline for responding to the Complaint is June 21, 2007; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, that pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), TD AMERITRADE need not respond to Plaintiff’s currently filed Complaint. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED, that Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint by June 28, 2007. Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:07-cv-02852-MJJ Document 5 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED, that TD AMERITRADE's deadline for filing a responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint shall be 20 days after the service of the Amended Complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). DATED: June 20, 2007 /s/ Lee H. Rubin Lee H. Rubin MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP Lee H. Rubin Shirish Gupta Attorneys for Defendant TD AMERITRADE, INC. DATED: June 20, 2007 /s/ Alan Himmelfarb Alan Himmelfarb LAW OFFICES OF ALAN HIMMELFARB Alan Himmelfarb Attorneys for Plaintiff MATTHEW ELVEY Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), Lee H. Rubin hereby attests that the Signatory’s concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. PADB01 44038047.1 20-Jun-07 11:31 1

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 6
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 0
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 27
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 0
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 19
Views: 29  |  Downloads: 0
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 23
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 0
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 22
Views: 15  |  Downloads: 0
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 2
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 7
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 25
Views: 20  |  Downloads: 0
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 21
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 14
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 15
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 20
Views: 20  |  Downloads: 0
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 39
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 0
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. - 11
Views: 67  |  Downloads: 1