Renewable Energy Resources on Mining Lands Geothermal Mapping by
Document Sample


Renewable Energy Resources on
Mining Lands: Geothermal
Mapping by the Great Basin Center
for Geothermal Energy
Lisa Shevenell, Ben Delwiche, and
Scott Phillips
Mackay School of Mines
University of Nevada, Reno
Mining Energy Solutions Conference
August 27, 2003
Purpose
• To present a series of maps
showing geothermal anomalies
in Nevada and their locations
relative to active and inactive,
precious metal mines.
• To encourage local geothermal
assessment efforts at mines that
could either use the resource to
produce power or for direct use
applications either while in
operation or after closure.
Geothermal Resources of Nevada
Geothermal Resources of Nevada
From Shevenell &
From
2003, &
Garside,ShevenellNBMG
Garside, 2003, NBMG Map
Map 141
141
Chalcedony Geothermometer
Chalcedony Geothermometer and
Sample Locations
Na-K-Ca Geothermometer
Estimated Interseismic Strain Rate
Perpendicular to Quaternary Faults
(Blewitt, et al., 2002)
Calculated regional strain rate
field, including all strain matrix
components, from all available
GPS stations in the Great Basin
(and beyond).
Strain Rate
(from Geoff Blewitt, 2003)
The Density Function Model
(Coolbaugh)
• Regional favorability map for high-
temperature geothermal systems using
statistically-derived weights for the
following types of map information:
• Young volcanic rocks
• Depth to the water table
• Regional heat flux
• Presence of Paleozoic carbonate rocks
• Northeast-trending young faults
• Concentrations of boron in groundwaters
• Earthquake Richter magnitude sums
Density Function Model
(from Mark Coolbaugh, 2003)
Logistic Regression
Model Components
(Coolbaugh)
Evidence Layers Used to build
this model include:
• Young Volcanics
• Young Faults
• Strain Rate
• Gravity
• Earthquakes
Predicts favorability where hot
springs may not be present
Logistics Regression Model
Anomalies & Contoured
Geothermometer Temperatures (ºC)
Mine # anomalies Chalced Na-K-Ca
Florida Canyon Mine
(point) 2 205 229
Mule Canyon 4 108 128
Pyramid Mine 2 102 107
Hycroft Mine 1 101 89
Rosebud Mine 1 94 93
Denton-Rawhide Mine 3 91 93
Marigold 1 81 90
Lone Tree Mine 3 76 81
Battle Mountain Complex 4 75 121
McCoy/Cove Mine 4 73 76
Anomalies & Contoured
Geothermometer Temperatures
Mine # anomalies Chalced Na-K-Ca
Gold Eagle Mine 2 72 67
Cortez Gold Mine 2 70 33
Pinson Mine 1 68 85
MacArthur Mine 2 67 49
Sterling Mine 1 63 64
Yerington Mine 4 60 48
Coeur Rochester Mine 3 54 43
Willow Creek Mine 4 46 57
Lucerne Mine 2 39 31
Haywood Leach Facility 3 36 28
Conclusions
Mule Canyon has relatively high potential;
several others may also warrant closer
inspection
Only site that has data in the current models
is Florida Canyon, and maps show high
potential for that area, as they should
Carlin Trend mines appear to be in area of
lower geothermal potential, although T
up to 63ºC are known (Meikle). Some
data added from mines, but no significant
changes observed in T contours.
Additional data need to be incorporated into
models (e.g., Rawhide and Meikle have
elevated temperatures)
Related docs
Get documents about "