Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al
Doc. 141
Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP
Document 141
Filed 03/01/2007
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP STEPHEN C. NEAL (No. 170085) (nealsc@cooley.com) RICARDO RODRIGUEZ (No. 173003) (rr@cooley.com) MICHELLE S. RHYU (No. 212922) (mrhyu@cooley.com) Five Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 Tel: (650) 843-5000 Fax: (650) 857-0663 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY and Counterclaim Defendants THOMAS MERIGAN and MARK HOLODNIY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, Plaintiff, v. ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, ET AL.,
Case No. C 05 04158 MHP
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO MARCH 19, 2007
18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO
ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, ET AL., Counterclaimants, v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY; THOMAS MERIGAN; AND MARK HOLODNIY, Counterclaim Defendants.
1029754 v1/SF
1.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. C 05 04158 MHP
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP
Document 141
Filed 03/01/2007
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO
The Court has considered the Unopposed Motion to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Plaintiff Stanford University, and finds that the Unopposed Motion shall be GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference is continued to March 19, 2007 at 3 PM.
Dated: ____________ HONORABLE MARILYN HALL PATEL United States District Judge
1029754 v1/SF
1.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. C 05 04158 MHP
justia 4/9/2008 |
43 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/9/2008 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/9/2008 |
86 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/9/2008 |
68 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/9/2008 |
72 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/9/2008 |
105 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/9/2008 |
49 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/9/2008 |
44 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/9/2008 |
36 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/9/2008 |
63 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/9/2008 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/9/2008 |
34 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/9/2008 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/9/2008 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/9/2008 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/16/2008 |
423 |
3 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/16/2008 |
324 |
3 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/16/2008 |
311 |
2 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/16/2008 |
494 |
2 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/16/2008 |
587 |
2 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/16/2008 |
288 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/16/2008 |
335 |
1 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/16/2008 |
288 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/16/2008 |
304 |
0 |
0 |
legal
justia 4/16/2008 |
380 |
0 |
0 |
legal