Docstoc

Hofer et al v. Old Navy Inc. et al - 73

Document Sample
Hofer et al v. Old Navy Inc. et al - 73 Powered By Docstoc
					Hofer et al v. Old Navy Inc. et al                                                                                       Doc. 73
                        Case 4:05-cv-40170-FDS        Document 73         Filed 02/27/2007      Page 1 of 2



                                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                        FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
                                                              DOCKET NO: 05-40170 FDS

                   STEPHANIE HOFER and                    )
                   DOUGLAS HOFER,                         )
                        Plaintiffs,                       )
                                                          )
                   v.                                     )
                                                          )
                   GAP, INC., EXPEDIA, INC., and          )
                   TURTLE BEACH TOWERS,                   )
                         Defendants.                      )

                              PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO
                            FILE PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT, GAP, INC.’S,
                                      MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

                            Plaintiffs hereby move this Honorable Court for an extension of time to file

                   Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant, the Gap, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment. In

                   support hereof, Plaintiff states that both the Gap, Inc. and Expedia, Inc. have moved for

                   Summary Judgment, on March 15 and March 16, 2007, respectively and Plaintiffs require

                   additional time in order to prepare their Opposition. In addition, Plaintiffs’ counsel states

                   that she is a solo practitioner who has had a number of prior depositions and court

                   appearances scheduled for the time allocated to file a response.

                            Wherefore, Plaintiffs request that this Honorable Court grant Plaintiffs an

                   additional fourteen (14) days to file an Opposition to the Gap, Inc.’s Motion for Summary

                   Judgment.




                                                                                                               Dockets.Justia.com
  Case 4:05-cv-40170-FDS           Document 73        Filed 02/27/2007       Page 2 of 2



                                                      Plaintiffs,
                                                      By their attorney,


                                                      /s/ India L. Minchoff, Esq. .
                                                      India L. Minchoff, Esq. (652456)
                                                      Law Offices of Russo & Minchoff
                                                      123 Boston Street, 1st Floor
                                                      Boston, MA 02125
                                                      617/740-7340 telephone
                                                      617/740-7310 facsimile


                             CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

        I, India L. Minchoff, Esq., hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF
system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice
of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-
registered participants on August 11, 2006.

                                                      /s/ India L. Minchoff, Esq.

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Stats:
views:8
posted:4/9/2008
language:English
pages:2