Electronic Arts Inc. et al v. Giant Productions et al - 25 by justia

VIEWS: 10 PAGES: 3

									Electronic Arts Inc. et al v. Giant Productions et al                                                                  Doc. 25
                      Case 3:06-cv-03403-JSW              Document 25       Filed 12/08/2006   Page 1 of 3


                       KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP
                  1    R. JAMES SLAUGHTER - #192813
                  2    RYAN M. KENT - #220441
                       710 Sansome Street
                  3    San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
                       Telephone: (415) 391-5400
                  4    Facsimile: (415) 397-7188
                  5
                       Attorneys for Plaintiffs
                  6    ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. and ELECTRONIC ARTS MUSIC
                       PUBLISHING, INC.
                  7

                  8
                                                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                  9
                                                        NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
                 10

                 11                                         SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

                 12
                       ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., a Delaware                     Case No. C06-3403 JSW
                 13    Corporation, and ELECTRONIC ARTS
                       MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC., a Delaware
                 14    Corporation,                                         PROOF OF SERVICE
                 15
                                                             Plaintiffs,
                 16
                                v.
                 17
                       GIANT PRODUCTIONS, a French
                 18    Corporation, NAJIB MARC REGHAY, an
                       individual, and ALEXANDRA BERTHET, an
                 19    individual,
                 20                                        Defendants.
                 21

                 22

                 23

                 24

                 25

                 26

                 27

                 28


     374480.01                                                   PROOF OF SERVICE
                                                                 Case No. C06-3403 JSW
                                                                                                             Dockets.Justia.com
                 Case 3:06-cv-03403-JSW          Document 25         Filed 12/08/2006      Page 2 of 3



             1                                          PROOF OF SERVICE

             2    I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, State of California in the office of a
                  member of the bar of this court at whose direction the following service was made. I am over the
             3    age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My business address is Keker & Van
             4    Nest, LLP, 710 Sansome Street, San Francisco, California 94111.

             5    On December 8, 2006, I served the following document(s):

             6           [PROPOSED] DEFAULT JUDGMENT;

             7           APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT;

             8           DECLARATION OF RYAN M. KENT IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION
                         FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
             9

            10    by FEDERAL EXPRESS, by placing a true and correct copy in a sealed envelope addressed as
                  shown below. I am readily familiar with the practice of Keker & Van Nest, LLP for
            11    correspondence for delivery by FedEx Corporation. According to that practice, items are
                  retrieved daily by a FedEx Corporation employee for overnight delivery.
            12
                  Béatrice Dubreuil
            13    Association d’Avocats
            14    121, Champs Elysées
                  75008 PARIS – FRANCE
            15
                  Executed on December 8, 2006, at San Francisco, California.
            16
                  I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true
            17    and correct.
            18

            19                                                  /s/ Maria S. Canales
            20                                                  MARIA S. CANALES

            21

            22

            23

            24

            25

            26

            27

            28


374480.01                                                PROOF OF SERVICE
                                                         Case No. C06-3403 JSW
                 Case 3:06-cv-03403-JSW               Document 25             Filed 12/08/2006           Page 3 of 3



             1
                  Select   by regular UNITED STATES MAIL by placing a true and correct copy in a sealed envelope addressed as
             2             shown below. I am readily familiar with the practice of Keker & Van Nest, LLP for collection and
                           processing of correspondence for mailing. According to that practice, items are deposited with the United
             3             States Postal Service at San Francisco, California on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid. I
                           am aware that, on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or
                           the postage meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing stated in this affidavit.
             4
                  Select   by FEDERAL EXPRESS, by placing a true and correct copy in a sealed envelope addressed as shown
             5             below. I am readily familiar with the practice of Keker & Van Nest, LLP for correspondence for delivery
                           by FedEx Corporation. According to that practice, items are retrieved daily by a FedEx Corporation
             6             employee for overnight delivery.
             7    Select   by FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION (IKON), by placing a true and correct copy with IKON Office
                           Solutions, the firm’s in-house facsimile transmission center provider, for transmission on this date. The
             8             transmission was reported as complete and without error.

             9    Select   by FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION (PERSONAL), by transmitting via facsimile a true and correct copy
                           on this date. The transmission was reported as complete and without error.
            10
                  Select   by FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION (IKON) AND UNITED STATES MAIL, by placing a true and
            11             correct copy with IKON Office Solutions, the firm’s in-house facsimile transmission center provider, for
                           transmission on this date. The transmission was reported as complete and without error. Additionally, a
            12             true and correct copy was placed in a sealed envelope addressed as shown below. I am readily familiar
                           with the practice of Keker & Van Nest, LLP for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing.
            13             According to that practice, items are deposited with the United States Postal Service at San Francisco,
                           California on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am aware that, on motion of the party
            14             served, service is presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or the postage meter date is more than one
                           day after the date of deposit for mailing stated in this affidavit.
            15
                  Select   by FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION (PERSONAL) AND UNITED STATES MAIL, by transmitting via
            16             facsimile a true and correct copy on this date. The transmission was reported as complete and without
                           error. Additionally, a true and correct copy was placed in a sealed envelope addressed as shown below. I
            17             am readily familiar with the practice of Keker & Van Nest, LLP for collection and processing of
                           correspondence for mailing. According to that practice, items are deposited with the United States Postal
                           Service at San Francisco, California on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am aware that,
            18             on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or the postage
                           meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing stated in this affidavit.
            19
                  Select   by COURIER, by placing a true and correct copy in a sealed envelope addressed as shown below, and
            20             dispatching a messenger from [MESSENGER COMPANY], whose address is [MESSENGER COMPANY
                           ADDRESS], with instructions to hand-carry the above and make delivery to the following during normal
            21             business hours, by leaving the package with the person whose name is shown or the person authorized to
                           accept courier deliveries on behalf of the addressee.
            22
                  Select   by PERSONAL DELIVERY, by personally delivering a true and correct copy addressed as shown below.
            23

            24

            25

            26

            27

            28


374480.01                                                       PROOF OF SERVICE
                                                                Case No. C06-3403 JSW

								
To top