Acrobat PDF

Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo

You must be logged in to download this document
Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
44
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/9/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al Doc. 278 Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC Document 278 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DataTreasury Corporation Plaintiff v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al. Defendants § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 2:06-CV-72 DF MOTION BY DEFENDANTS CULLEN/FROST BANKERS, INC. AND THE FROST NATIONAL BANK TO SEVER AND STAY THE CLAIMS RELATING TO THE BALLARD PATENTS PENDING REEXAMINATION OF THE BALLARD PATENTS Defendants Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (collectively “Frost”) move for a severance and stay of the claims related to U.S. Patent Nos. 5,910,988 and 6,032,137 (collectively the “Ballard patents”) pending reexamination of those patents by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Because Frost is only accused of infringing the Ballard patents, this will effectively stay the entire proceeding as to Frost and eliminate the need for Frost to undertake potentially unnecessary discovery. Defendants Harris Bankcorp, Inc., Harris N.A., KeyBank National Association, KeyCorp, PNC Bank, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., SunTrust Bank, SunTrust Banks, Inc., and Electronic Data Systems Corp. filed a Motion to Sever and Stay the Claims Relating to the Ballard Patents Pending Reexamination of the Ballard Patents on September 19, 2006. (Docket Entry #260). Frost hereby adopts the arguments and authorities advanced by that Motion to Sever and Stay as if set forth fully herein. For the same reasons articulated in that Motion to Sever and Stay, and in particular to avoid the time and expense of litigating patent claims of uncertain continuing validity, Frost respectfully requests the Court sever and stay all Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC Document 278 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 2 of 3 claims of this lawsuit related to the Ballard patents, pending completion of the reexamination of those patents. Dated: October 5, 2006 Respectfully submitted, By: __/s/ Kurt M. Sauer_______ Kurt M. Sauer State Bar No. 17673700 DAFFER MCDANIEL, LLP 700 Lavaca Street, Suite 720 Austin, Texas 78701 Tel. (512) 476-1400 Fax (512) 703-1250 ksauer@dmtechlaw.com ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS CULLEN/FROST BANKERS, INC. AND THE FROST NATIONAL BANK 2 Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC Document 278 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I hereby certify that on October 4, 2006 I conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel, Karl Rupp, in a good faith attempt to resolve this matter without court intervention. Plaintiff’s counsel stated that Plaintiff opposes the motion. /s/ Kurt M. Sauer____________ Kurt M. Sauer CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5 (a)(3)(A) on October 5, 2006. /s/ Kurt M. Sauer____________ Kurt M. Sauer 3

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo
Views: 93  |  Downloads: 0