Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
594
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/9/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al Doc. 277 Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC Document 277 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DATATREASURY CORPORATION v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, ET AL § § § § § Cause No. 2:06cv72(DF) DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS’ JOINDER IN THE [260] MOTION OF DEFENDANTS EDS, HARRIS KEY, PNC, AND SUNTRUST TO SEVER AND STAY THE CLAIMS RELATING TO THE BALLARD PATENTS PENDING REEXAMINATION OF THE BALLARD PATENTS TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW Separate Defendant, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, and hereby joins in the [260] Motion of Defendants EDS, Harris Key, PNC, and Suntrust to Sever and Stay the Claims Relating to the Ballard Patents Pending Reexamination of the Ballard Patents filed on September 25, 2006. Respectfully submitted, YOUNG, PICKETT & LEE 4122 Texas Blvd.-P.O. Box 1897 Texarkana, TX-AR 75504-1897 Telephone: 903/794-1303 Facsimile: 903/794-5098 By: /s/ Lance Lee Lance Lee Texas Bar No. 24004762 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC Document 277 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). Therefore, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to FED .R.CIV .P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy via email transmission, facsimile and/or U.S. Mail this 5th day of September, 2006. /s/ Lance Lee Lance Lee

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo
Views: 95  |  Downloads: 0