Lewis v. Milwaukee Brewers - 23

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
21
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/9/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
Lewis v. Milwaukee Brewers Doc. 23 Case 2:05-cv-01330-WEC Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 3 Document 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DUANE LEWIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Case No. 05-C-1330 MILWAUKEE BREWERS BASEBALL ) CLUB, L.P., ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES The Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, L.P., by and through its attorneys, Foley & Lardner LLP, hereby answers plaintiff’s complaint and asserts its affirmative defenses as follows: 1. Except to the extent dismissed pursuant to the Court’s August 9, 2006 Order, denies the allegations of Paragraph 1. 2. Except to the extent dismissed pursuant to the Court’s August 9, 2006 Order, denies the allegations of Paragraph 2. 3. Except to the extent dismissed pursuant to the Court’s August 9, 2006 Order, denies the allegations of Paragraph 3. 4. Except to the extent dismissed pursuant to the Court’s August 9, 2006 Order, denies the allegations of Paragraph 4. 5. Except to the extent dismissed pursuant to the Court’s August 9, 2006 Order, denies the allegations of Paragraph 5. MILW_2061881.1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:05-cv-01330-WEC Filed 08/09/2006 Page 2 of 3 Document 23 First Affirmative Defense Plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Second Affirmative Defense Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the statute of limitations to the extent they arise out of acts or omissions that occurred before June 26, 2004. Third Affirmative Defense Plaintiff’s claims must be dismissed because no similarly-situated person, outside of plaintiff’s protected class, received more favorable treatment, and therefore plaintiff cannot establish a prima facie case of discrimination. Fourth Affirmative Defense Plaintiff’s claims must be dismissed because plaintiff’s employment was terminated for a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason. Fifth Affirmative Defense Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by his failure to report promptly his claims and allegations under the Club’s published harassment policy. Sixth Affirmative Defense Upon information and belief, plaintiff failed to mitigate his alleged damages, if any. MILW_2061881.1 Case 2:05-cv-01330-WEC Filed 08/09/2006 Page 3 of 3 Document 23 WHEREFORE, the Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, L.P. seeks judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint on its merits and with prejudice, awarding such costs and fees as may be allowable by law, and granting such other relief as the Court may deem just and appropriate under the circumstances. Dated: August 9, 2006. Respectfully submitted, Andrew J. Wronski _______________________________________ Andrew J. Wronski WI Bar No. 1024029 Foley & Lardner LLP 777 East Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53202-5306 414.271.2400 414.297.4900 Attorneys for Defendant Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, L.P. MILW_2061881.1

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
Lewis v. Milwaukee Brewers - 26
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
Lewis v. Milwaukee Brewers - 25
Views: 15  |  Downloads: 0
Lewis v. Milwaukee Brewers - 5
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
Lewis v. Milwaukee Brewers - 24
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
Lewis v. Milwaukee Brewers - 16
Views: 20  |  Downloads: 0
Lewis v. Milwaukee Brewers - 7
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 0
Lewis v. Milwaukee Brewers - 11
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
Lewis v. Milwaukee Brewers - 32
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
Lewis v. Milwaukee Brewers - 28
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 0
Lewis v. Milwaukee Brewers - 21
Views: 20  |  Downloads: 0