NM Slides

Document Sample
NM Slides
Role of Research



• Understand Public Opinion

• Correct Misperceptions

• Demonstrate Voter Support

• Reassure Nervous Pols

• Reveal Health Impact

• Counter Economic Anecdotes

• Generate Earned Media

A Strong Majority of New Yorkers Support

The State’s Smoke-Free Workplace Law

Recently, a law went into effect prohibiting smoking in all workplaces in New York state, including offices,

restaurants, and bars. Would you say that you support or oppose the law?









Total Support: 70%

80









60

24



40

Total Oppose: 28%



20

46 12



15

0



Support Oppose

Darker shading equals stronger intensity New York

Total numbers are rounded Statewide survey of registered voters - September 2003

Voters Believe In The Right to Breathe Clean Air

Inside Restaurants and Bars

Which one of the following do you think is more important?



The rights of customers and employees to breathe clean air inside

restaurants and bars



The rights of smokers to smoke inside restaurants and bars









Right to breathe 55% strong 76%

clean air





Right of smokers to 6%

strong 16%

smoke



0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Darker shading equals stronger intensity

New York

Total numbers are rounded

Statewide survey of registered voters - September 2003

Voters Think Restaurants and Bars are Healthier, More

Enjoyable, and Have No Inclination To Change The Law

% strongly/somewhat agree



Restaurants and bars are healthier for

customers and employees now that they 54% 31% 85

are smoke-free



It’s really nice to go out and enjoy New

York’s restaurants and bars without 82

57% 26%

smelling like smoke when you get home



There has been a lot of talk about changing

the new law, but we should give the law a 75

43% 31%

chance to work before trying to weaken it



People should not get too worked up about

this law. It is not too much to ask for

smokers to step outside a restaurant or bar 46% 31%

77

when they want a cigarette

The media is blowing this out of proportion.

There will always be a small group of 70

people who complain about the smoke-free 36% 34%

law, but overall the new law is working fine



0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

New York

Statewide survey of registered voters - September 2003

September 15, 2003 Contact: Josh Isay, 212-535-8384 or

For Immediate Release Micah Lasher, 646-602-6577





New Poll Shows 70% of New Yorkers Favor Statewide

Smoke-Free Workplace Law

Support Strong Across State and Party Lines

By a margin of 70% to 28%, New York voters support the State’s smoke-free workplace

law, according to a new poll released today by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.

The poll also found that 54% of those surveyed are more likely to support a candidate for

the State Legislature who voted for the law and 20% would be less likely to support such

a candidate (see attached fact sheet).



“This poll shows that across demographic and geographic boundaries, New Yorkers are

embracing the State smoke-free law as both good for their health and for their pleasure

when going out to restaurants and bars,” said Matthew L. Myers, President of the

Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. “Any lawmaker who tries to roll back this law is going

to have to face their constituents.”



The survey found that eight out of ten New Yorkers (83 percent) surveyed believe that

second-hand smoke is a health hazard and that three out of four voters (75 percent) felt

that we should give the law a chance to work before trying to weaken it..



The smoke-free workplace law was passed by the State Senate and Assembly and

signed into law by Governor Pataki in March. Supported by the American Heart

Association, the American Cancer Association, and the American Lung Association, the

law prohibits smoking in nearly all workplaces, bars and restaurants where employees

are exposed to the 69 carcinogens in secondhand smoke.



The survey of 600 registered voters throughout New York State was conducted between

Friday, September 12 and Sunday, September 14, 2003 by Global Strategy Group. The

poll has a margin of error of +/- 4%.

--30--

To: Members of the New York State Assembly

From: Penny Leask, NYS PTA President

Patricia Hysert, NYS PTA Health Chairman

#716-861-4776

Date: 10/8/03

Re: Voter Support for Clean Indoor Air Law

On behalf of the members of the New York State Congress of Parents

and Teachers, Inc. (PTA), we would like to thank you for supporting

enactment this Spring of the Clean Indoor Air Act. The Assembly’s

leadership on this issue is appreciated by the broad coalition of health and

community agencies that supported the legislation.



Attached is a new statewide poll which shows that there is

overwhelming bi-partisan support for the State’s smoke-free workplace law.

The poll conducted by Global Strategy Group found that 70% of voters

support the current law and 75% agree that the law should be given a

chance to work before trying to weaken it. Eighty-two percent of those

polled appreciate being able to patronize smoke free restaurants and bars.



Support for the new law cuts across geographic and partisan lines:



 Upstate voters favor the law 66-32%; suburban voters favor it 74-24%;

New York City voters favor it 71-25%;

 Republicans support the law 66-32%; Democrats support the law 71-

26%; Independents support the law 75-22%



This poll clearly demonstrates that a majority of the public believes that

the Legislature and the Governor did the right thing by enacting the Clean

Indoor Act. The law protects children and young people from diseases

caused by secondhand smoke. In addition, studies have indicated that

bans on smoking in public places will significantly lower the rates of

adolescent smoking. We thank you for your past support and urge you to

continue to advocate for the law.

Residents Across The State Support

Connecticut’s Smoke-Free Workplace Law

Recently, a law went into effect prohibiting smoking inside all workplaces in Connecticut, including offices,

restaurants, and bars. Would you say that you support or oppose the law?





100



85 88 86 85

79

80







60







40





19

20 14 14

11 13



0

All Hartford Fairfield New Haven Rest of State

Connecticut

Total numbers are rounded Support Oppose Statewide survey - August 2004

September 28, 2004



Residents back smoking ban, poll finds

By Tobin A. Coleman



HARTFORD -- Days before the one-year anniversary of Connecticut's

workplace smoking ban, a new poll shows residents are overwhelmingly

behind it.



In spite of the support, a group of bar and tavern owners is moving forward

today with a lawsuit to have the ban declared unconstitutional.



According to a survey released by Mobilize Against Tobacco for Children's

Health, or MATCH Coalition, yesterday at a Capitol news conference, 74

percent of state residents said they strongly support the ban and 10 percent said

they somewhat support it, for a rounded total of 85 percent in support.



There were 8 percent who strongly oppose the ban and 6 percent who oppose it

somewhat, for a total of 14 percent.



In Fairfield County, 86 percent support the ban.



The smoking ban went into effect last October in all indoor workplaces,

including offices and restaurants. Bars were added to the ban in April. Private

clubs are exempt.



When residents were asked what was more important -- the rights of customers

and employees to breathe clean air inside restaurants and bars, or the rights of

smokers to smoke there -- 79 percent said the right to breathe clean air was

much more important, compared to 2 percent who said smokers' rights much

more important.



"These numbers tell a very powerful story, not a surprising one, but a powerful

message," said state Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who worked for

several years to get the ban passed in the Legislature.

Delaware Voters Overwhelmingly Support The

State’s Smoke-Free Workplace Law

Last year, a law went into effect prohibiting smoking inside most workplaces in Delaware, including offices,

restaurants, bars and casinos. Would you say that you support or oppose the law?





100





Total Support: 77%

80



15

60









40



62 Total Oppose: 23%

20

9

14

0



Support Oppose

Darker shading equals stronger intensity Delaware

Total numbers are rounded Statewide survey of registered voters - October 2003

Voters Would Reject A Candidate Who Wants

To Change The Smoke-Free Law

Candidate X supports says Delaware’s smoke-free Candidate Y says Delaware’s smoke-free

workplace law is working and supports leaving the law workplace law went too far and wants to change

as it is the law to allow smoking in some workplaces





80

66% Margin of more

than 2-to-1

60 13





40

27%



53

20 12



15

0

Candidate who supports leaving the law as it is Candidate who wants to change the law



Darker shading equals stronger intensity Delaware

Total numbers are rounded Statewide survey of registered voters - October 2003

Voters View Gov. Minner More Favorably Because of Her

Support for the Smoke-Free Workplace Law



Governor Ruth Ann Minner has been a strong supporter of Delaware’s smoke-free workplace law. Does the Governor’s

support for the law make you view her more favorably or less favorably?









More favorably 34 24 58%









Less favorably 10 7 17% A majority of Democrats,

Republicans and independents

have a more favorable view of

the Governor



No difference 23 23%





0 20 40 60 80





Darker shading equals stronger intensity Delaware

Total numbers are rounded Statewide survey of registered voters - October 2003

Do you approve or disapprove of the way Michael

Bloomberg is handling . . .

Disapprove Approve



Crime -28% 61%









The ban on smoking in

-36% 59%

restaurants and bars





The Public Schools -49% 36%









The City Budget -51% 36%









Approve Disapprove

Taxes -61% 28%





Quinnipiac University

Survey of registered voters – October 2003 -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Maine Residents Support The

Smoke-Free Workplace Law

On January 1st of 2004, a law was enacted whereby all bars, taverns, lounges, and pool halls in Maine

became smoke-free. Do you support or oppose this law?





80 76

71





60









40

29

24

20









0

Support Oppose

Baseline (11-03) 9 month (9-04)

Total numbers are rounded

Over Time, Even Maine’s Smokers Support

The Smoke-Free Law

On January 1st of 2004, a law was enacted whereby all bars, taverns, lounges, and pool halls

in Maine became smoke-free. Do you support or oppose this law?



80







60 60

60



46

40

40









20









0

Smokers - Support Smokers - Oppose

Baseline (11-03) 9 month (9-04)

Total numbers are rounded

Tuesday, October 5, 2004



Survey shows majority of smokers support

smoking ban

By Tobin A. Coleman



Associated Press

AUGUSTA, Maine — A majority of smokers support Maine´s smoking ban in bars,

lounges and pool halls, according to a new survey.

A poll commissioned by the Maine Coalition on Smoking or Health shows that 54

percent of Maine residents who smoke support the ban, up from 40 percent who favored

it when the law went into effect Jan. 1. Among all respondents, 76 percent said they favor

the smoking ban, up from 71 percent last December.

Carol Kelly, director of the Augusta-based coalition, said she was particularly heartened

by the number of smokers who support the law.

"This is a common-sense law," she said. "It´s clear that people appreciate smoke-free

indoor space."

The Sept. 23 telephone survey of 600 Mainers was conducted by Critical Insights polling

firm in Portland and has a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points.

The coalition has more than 50 members, including the American Cancer Society, the

American Heart Association, the American Lung Association of Maine, Consumers for

Affordable Health Care, Maine Hospital Association and Medical Care Development.

Mary Ellen FitzGerald, president of Critical Insights, said the survey showed that

women, people over 45 and residents of northern Maine were more supportive of the

smoking ban.

Near Universal Approval of

California’s Smoke-free Workplace Law (2004)

100





80

Percent









60





40





20





0

Overall Smoker New Resident

Approval 89.6 74.9 93.3





Note: “New resident” defined as Californians who moved to the state after the 1995 law went into effect.

“Approval” includes “strong” approval and “somewhat” approval.

Source: The 2004 Survey of California Adults on Secondhand Smoke conducted by Field Research Corporation.

Prepared by: California Department of Health Services, Tobacco Control Section, January 2005.

75% of New Yorkers Support The City’s Smoke-Free Law

The Law is Even More Popular Than a Variety of New York Institutions



Voter Support for the

75%

Smoke-Free Workplace Law



Favorable Rating



New York Yankees 69%



New York Knicks 63%



David Letterman 62%



Coney Island Hot Dog 61%



A deli cornbeef sandwich 60%



Krispy Kreme donuts 49%



48%

Donald Trump



George Steinbrenner 39%



0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

New York City

Survey of registered voters - March 2004

March 28, 2004



Smoke ban a hit - even outpolls Yanks

Lisa L. Colangelo

New York Daily News



What do New Yorkers like more than the Yankees or a Coney Island hot dog?

The smoking ban.

Or at least that's the conclusion of a poll of 500 registered voters for the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.

According to the poll, 61% of people strongly support the ban on smoking in workplaces, including bars, restaurants and offices.

That's up from 55% in a similar poll conducted in August.

Another 14% said they "somewhat" support the ban.

"Those are amazing numbers," said Josh Isay, a spokesman for the campaign. "People should know that contrary to some press

reports, this law is very popular ... it's a vocal minority that opposes the law."

By comparison, 46% of respondents reported a "very favorable" view of the New York Yankees, and 39% were big fans of

Coney Island hot dogs.

And 70% of people said the rights of customers to be in a smoke-free restaurant or bar is more important than the right to smoke.

Bob Zuckerman of the New York Nightlife Association questioned the validity of the results.

"When you group bars and restaurants together, you get a much different result than if you just ask about bars," he said. "We

continue to hear from members and even nonmembers that the smoking ban has hurt business and curtailed the bar business."

About 80% of the women surveyed support the ban while only 19% opposed it. Meanwhile, 70% of men supported the ban and

29% opposed it.



The poll had a margin of error of 4.5%.

Delaware Smoke-free Law Clears The Air

James Repace Delaware Study, 2003

Carcinogen (PPAH) Fine Particle Air

ng/m3 Levels Drop 95% Micrograms/m3 Pollution (RSP) Levels

140 250 Drop 90%





120



B 200

B

100

E E

F F

80

O 150

O 24-hour NAAQS for PM 2.5

R R

E E

60

100 A

A F

40 F T

T 50 E

20 E R

R

0 0



Indoor air quality test conduced Nov. 15, 2002 and Jan. 24, 2003 to assess levels of air pollution before and after DE Clean

Indoor Air Law went into effect. One casino, 5 restaurants with bars, one taproom and one pool hall were tested

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE Contact: Joel Spivak

9 AM, May 20, 2004 202-296-5469



Bars and Restaurants in Smoke-Free Cities Have

82% Less Air Pollution Than Cities That

Allow Smoking, Seven-City Study Finds

CDC Recently Advised Persons With Heart Disease to Avoid Smoky

Establishments



Washington, DC – Bars and restaurants in cities that protect workers and

patrons with smoke-free workplace laws have dramatically lower levels

of indoor air pollution than those without such protections, according to a

study released today.



The study, conducted by researchers at the Roswell Park Cancer Institute

in Buffalo, used state-of-the-art air pollution monitors to measure the

levels of fine particulate air pollution in the bars and restaurants of seven

major U.S. cities. Three of the cities – Buffalo, New York and Los

Angeles – have comprehensive smoke-free workplace laws covering

restaurants and bars, and four – Baltimore, Washington, DC,

Philadelphia, and Hoboken, NJ – do not have such laws.



The study found that air pollution levels were 82 percent lower on

average in venues required by law to be smoke-free compared to those

where smoking was permitted. In cities without smoke-free laws, full-

time bar and restaurant employees are exposed on the job to more than

four times the average annual limits of fine particulate air pollution

recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the

study found.



The study found that New York City’s restaurants and bars had the

lowest level of air pollution, followed in order by Buffalo, Los Angeles,

Hoboken, Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington, DC, which had the

highest levels of indoor air pollution.

Average Level of Indoor Air Pollution in Places in States that

Allow Smoking and States That Don't.

Average PM 2.5 level (μg/m 3 )









400



293

300





200





100 53



0

Smoke-free Venues Smoking Venues

Average PM 2.5 level (μg/m 3)

Lo

s









0

100

200

300

400

500

An

ge

le

s









94

Bu

f fa

lo







27

Ba

lti

m

or

W e

as

293









hi

ng

to

n ,D

C

392









Ph

ila

d el

ph

ia

254









H

ob

ok

en

N

231









ew

Yo

Average Level of Indoor Air Pollution in Each City Sampled









r k

C

ity

25

April 25, 2004

So a Guy Walks Into a Bar With an Air

Monitor...

Richard Perez-Pena



It takes a toll, being the scientist who has to measure the air quality

in bar after bar around the East and West Coasts, wearily checking

for smoke particles between beers.

"You go to a bar, have a beer, go to another bar," said Mark Travers,

a 28-year-old doctoral candidate at the University at Buffalo, part of

the State University of New York. He carried his sophisticated

monitoring equipment in a shoulder case.

"By the end of the night, you aren't so motivated to pick up and go on

to the next bar," he said. "Occupational hazard. I'm not really

complaining, 'Oh, I have to go bar-hopping again.' But I definitely

don't go in to work early like I used to."

Nonetheless, after months of arduous research, Mr. Travers and other

scientists at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo have reached a

significant conclusion about indoor air in Mayor Michael R.

Bloomberg's New York, a year after the city banned smoking in all

bars and restaurants: The atmosphere in them has, on average, less

than one-tenth as many fine particles and other harmful chemicals as

in cities where smoking is still allowed. When they looked only at

bars, and only late at night when the indoor haze was thickest, the

contrast to New York City was much sharper.

While the results he gathered may not be terribly surprising, the

study, financed in part by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, an

antismoking group, put a numerical stamp on the still-new

New York City

• ―Since the law went into effect,

business receipts for restaurants and

bars have increased, employment

has risen, virtually all

establishments are complying with

the law, and the number of new

liquor licenses issued has

increased—all signs that New York

City bars and restaurants are

prospering.‖







“The State of Smoke-Free New York City: A One-Year Review”, March 2004.

Clearing the Air in New York City



As Air Clears, Even Smokers Are Converted

James McBratney, president of February 6, 2005

the Staten Island Restaurant By JIM RUTENBERG and LILY KOPPEL





and Tavern Association. Back in 2002, when the City Council was weighing

"The crystal ball that Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's proposal to eliminate

smoking from all indoor public places, few opponents

people are looking at were more fiercely outspoken than James McBratney,

president of the Staten Island Restaurant and Tavern

to project economic Association.

stability is not good He frequently ripped Mr. Bloomberg as a billionaire

dictator with a prohibitionist streak that would undo

enough for me." small businesses like his bar and his restaurant. Visions

October 11, 2002 of customers streaming to the legally smoke-filled pubs

New York Daily News

of New Jersey kept him awake at night.

Asked last week what he thought of the now

two-year-old ban, Mr. McBratney sounded

changed. ''I have to admit,'' he said

sheepishly, ''I've seen no falloff in business in

either establishment.'' He went on to describe

what he once considered unimaginable:

Customers actually seem to like it, and so does

he.

NIGHT LIFE RISES FROM ASHES OF SMOKING BAN

By KENNETH LOVETT and PERRY CHIARAMONTE



The Big Apple's night life is still thriving, despite predictions it would go up in smoke because of the ban on butts, a new state study shows.

The first-time study by the state Department of Taxation and Finance - a copy of which was obtained by The Post - shows that while tavern business in the city dipped

the first six months after the smoking ban went into effect in March 2003, it has been rebounding steadily since.

The study, which for the first time separated out the sales at bars from restaurants, also showed the smoking ban had even less of an initial impact on restaurants,

where business has grown at a faster rate than at watering holes.

"Certainly there was a short-term impact in the middle of 2003, but clearly since then business hasn't suffered," said state Tax and Finance spokesman Thomas Bergin.

"As a matter of fact, business has improved."

Many bar workers and patrons are not surprised.

"We have smokers who come here that are still upset that they have to go outside, but people find a way to deal with it," said Lucie, a bartender at Milady's on Prince

Street.

Samir Hadjarab, manager of Red Bench Bar on Sullivan Street, added, "It was quiet for a while, but now a majority of my customers are nonsmokers."

According to the state study, sales-tax revenue collected from bars dropped 5.9 percent and 7.8 percent during the first two quarters following the implementation of

the city ban - the largest declines experienced since business dropped 17 percent right after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in 2001.

But since September 2003, bar business has begun climbing again, whereas statewide, it has dropped or remained relatively flat since the state smoking ban went into

effect July 2003.

For the quarter beginning last June and ending in August, city bars and taverns reported $73.2 million in sales taxes, a healthy 3.8 percent increase over the same

period in 2003.

Business even increased slightly during the winter months of late 2003 and early 2004, when smokers had to get used to going outside and lighting up, despite the cold

and snow.

State tax officials contend that the numbers are evidence that, despite dire predictions by bar owners and pro-smoking forces, the ban has not decimated the city's

bustling night-life industry.

But Scott Wexler, executive director of the Empire State Restaurant and Tavern Association, said the increase in state sales taxes that were collected from bars can

likely be pinned to a quarter-percent increase in the sales tax enacted by the state, as well as to establishments being forced to increase drink prices to make up for lost

business.

Still, many customers told The Post they are happy with the smoke-free environment.

"It's more enjoyable," said Howard Glassman, 34, a nonsmoking patron at the Bleecker Street Bar. "People are pretty adaptive, and over time, they have gotten over

it."

Yvonne, a bartender at Tom and Jerry's on Elizabeth Street, said: "I still see a lot of smokers coming out. They go outside, and it's become a very social thing."


Share This Document


Related docs
Other docs by Piece Piece
by registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!